Segmentary analysis of the efficiency of state enterprises

Main Article Content

Iryna Parasii-Verhunenko
Nataliia Hryshchenko
Tetiana Kostiuk
Lydiia Fedoryshyna
Oleksandr Hridin

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to substantiate the main stages and directions of analysis of the activities of state-owned enterprises by operational and geographical segments, taking into account the goals and objectives of strategic management. The information base of the empirical study was the data of the official website of JSC “Ukrzaliznytsia” for 2020. The methodological and methodological basis of the study is the National Accounting Regulation (Standard) 29 “Financial reporting by segments” and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) 8 “Operating segments”. The following methodical methods were used in the course of the research, namely: methods as comparison, modelling, time series, structural and dynamic, graphic and coefficient analysis. Based on the proposed methodology, the efficiency of JSC “Ukrzaliznytsia” is analysed and the problematic operating segments of its activities are identified, which reduce the overall financial results of the company. The results of the study are the improvement and systematization of analytical indicators in terms of individual stages and areas of strategic analysis of the effectiveness of state enterprises through the differentiation of performance evaluation of their operating business segments. For this purpose the main stages and directions of the analysis on the following analytical blocks are offered: the analysis of external environment of functioning of a business segment; analytical assessment of the competitiveness and competitive position of the business segment; analysis of resource potential and efficiency of production capacity of the business segment; assessment of innovation and investment activity of the business segment; analysis of the efficiency of the business segment; analysis of the state of execution of budgets of revenues, expenditures, profits; analysis of management efficiency and quality.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Integration System of Education, Science and Production
Author Biographies

Iryna Parasii-Verhunenko, Kyiv National Economic University by V.Hetman

Doctor of Science (Economics), professor of accounting Department of credit and budgetary institutions and economic analysis The State higher economic establishment «Vadym Hetman Kyiv National Economic University»,

She teaches disciplines: Strategic Analysis, Economic Analysis, Corporate Analysis and Business Diagnostics.

Scientific interests: The economic analysis in the management of the enterprise,  Strategic Analysis, Corporate Analysis, and Business Diagnostics, Financial Analysis, International Accounting, control, and analysis practices.

Author of more than 196 scientific works. 

Nataliia Hryshchenko, Kyiv National University named after Vadym Hetman

Ph.D. in Economics, Assistant professor at the International Management Department. She teaches disciplines: Global Economy, International Consulting. Scientific interests: International consulting and accounting, International management, Global corporations development trends, strategic management. Author of more than 30 scientific works.

Tetiana Kostiuk, National University of Bioresources and Nature Management of Ukraine

Ph.D. in Economics, Associate Professor of the Economics Department. She teaches the following subjects: Labor economics and social and labor relations. Scientific interests: Food security, Economic security of Agriculture of Ukraine, Labor Economics.

Lydiia Fedoryshyna , Vinnytsia National Agrarian University

Ph. D. in Historical Studies, Associate Professor, Departments Аnalysis and Аudit. Candidate of Historical Sciences. Her continuous experience exceeds thirty years. Since 1992 he has been working at Vinnytsia National Agrarian University. In addition to research work, she teaches Statistics, Economic Analysis, Strategic and Macroeconomic Analysis, etc. Research interests: Analysis, Statistics, Taxation. 

Oleksandr Hridin, State Biotechnological University

Ph.D. (2019), Associate Professor (2020), Director of the Educational and Scientific Institute of Business and Management, the associate professor in the Department of Organization of Production, Business and Management. He teaches disciplines taught: HR management; innovation management; operations management; strategic management; organization of production. Scientific interests: Development of personnel management systems of agricultural enterprises: theory, methodology, practice. Author of more than 100 scientific works. Researcher ID: G-1849-2017. Scopus Author ID: 57216225277

References

Aleksjejeva, A., & Ighnatenko, T. (2010). Etapy stanovlennja i rozvytku seghmentarnogho obliku ta zvitnosti v Ukrajini [Stages of formation and development of segmental accounting and reporting in Ukraine]. Visnyk Kyjivsjkogho nacionaljnogho torghoveljno-ekonomichnogho universytetu, 5, 40-45.

Barnetoa, P., & Ouvrardb, S. (2015). Is the firm's business model related to segment reporting? Research in International Business and Finance. 35, 122-137

Birt, J., & Shailer ,G. (2011). Forecasting confidence under segment reporting. Accounting Research Journal, 24(3), 245-267.

Birt, J., Joshi, M., & Kend, M. (2017). Segment reporting in a developing economy: the Indian banking sector. Asian Review of Accounting, 25(1), 127-147.

Ghembl, P. R., Marsella, E., & Tapp, A. (2007). Marketynghovaja revoljucyja [Marketing Revolution] M. Balans Byznes Buks, 428 s.

Heo, К.(2018). Segment Reporting Level And Analyst Forecast Accuracy. The Journal of Applied Business Research. Vol. 34, Nо 3, 471 – 485.

Herrmann, D., & Thomas, W. (1996). Segment reporting in the European Union: Analyzing the effects of country, size, industry, and exchange listing. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation. 5(1), 1-20.

Kobbi-Fakhfakh, S., Shabou, R. M., & Pigé, B. (2018). Determinants of segment reporting quality: evidence from EU. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting. 16(1), 84-107

Kotler, P. (2008). Osnovy marketyngha [Basics of Marketing]. M. Vyljjams, 647.

Lamben, Zh., Chumpytas, R., & Shulingh, I.(2010). Menedzhment, oryentyrovannij na rynok [Market-oriented management]. SPb Pyter. 710.

Leghenchuk, S. F.(2016) Finansova zvitnistj za seghmentamy: istorychni aspekty, aktualjni problemy ta perspektyvy rozvytku [Financial statements by segment: historical aspects, actual problems and prospects of development]. Problemy teoriji ta metodologhiji bukhghaltersjkogho obliku, kontrolju i analizu, 2-3(35), 228-239[in Ukrainian]

Mizhnarodnyi standart finansovoi zvitnosti 8 « Operacijni seghmenty» [International Financial Reporting Standard 8 «Operating Segments»] Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/ laws/show/995_k53# Text

Natsionalne polozhennia (standart) bukhhalterskoho obliku 29 «Finansova zvitnistj za seghmentamy» [National Accounting Standart of Ukraine 29 Financial statements by segment "]: nakaz Ministerstva finansiv Ukrainy vid 19.05.2005 r. № 412. Retrivied from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/ z0621-05#Text

Nita, В. (2013). Segmental reporting in responsibility accounting under international financial reporting standards. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu. No. 290, 60-71.

Oficijnyj sajt Akcionernogho tovarystva «Ukrajinsjka zaliznycja» [Official website of the "Ukrainian Zaliznytsia" Company] Retrivied from: https://www.uz.gov.ua/

Ozeran, A.V., & Vovk, M. O. (2014). Audyt zvitnosti za seghmentamy [Audit of reporting by segment] Nezalezhnyj auditor, 7(1), 47–54. [in Ukrainian]

Paul, J. W., & Largay, J. A. (2005). Does the “management approach” contribute to segment reporting transparency? Business Horizons. 48(4), 303-310

Saidi, F. (2017). Corporate governance and segmental disclosure: evidence from Canada. International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting (IJMFA), 9(2). Retrivied from: https://www.inderscience.com/offer.php?id =84778

Talha, М., Abdullah, S., & Madani, H. (2009). Segmental reporting and competitive disadvantage: a study of Malaysian companies. International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting, 1(3), 305-319

Most read articles by the same author(s)

فروشگاه اینترنتی