The effect of women director on banks performance: Evidence from Pakistan
Main Article Content
Abstract
Downloads
Article Details
1. Proposal of Policy for Free Access Periodics
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in an institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
Proposal of Policy for Periodic that offer Postponed Free Access
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 [SPECIFY TIME HERE] after the publication, allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
d. They allow some kind of open dissemination. Authors can disseminate their articles in open access, but with specific conditions imposed by the editor that are related to:
Version of the article that can be deposited in the repository:
Pre-print: before being reviewed by pairs.
Post-print: once reviewed by pairs, which can be:
The version of the author that has been accepted for publication.
The editor's version, that is, the article published in the magazine.
At which point the article can be made accessible in an open manner: before it is published in the magazine, immediately afterwards or if a period of seizure is required, which can range from six months to several years.
Where to leave open: on the author's personal web page, only departmental websites, the repository of the institution, the file of the research funding agency, among others.
References
ADAMS, R. B.; FUNK, P. (2012) Beyond the glass ceiling: Does gender matter? Manag. Sci., v. 58, p. 219–235.
ADAMS, R. B.; HAAN, J.; TERJESEN, S.; EES, H. (2015) Board diversity: Moving the field forward. Corp. Gov. Int. Rev., v. 23, p. 77–82.
BANTEL, K. A.; JACKSON, S. E. (1989) Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strateg. Manag. J., v. 10, p. 107–124.
BRAMMER, S.; MILLINGTON, A.; PAVELIN, S. (2007) Gender and ethnic diversity among UK corporate boards. Corp. Gov. Int. Rev., v. 15, p. 393–403.
BURGESS, Z.; THARENOU, P. (2002) Women board directors: Characteristics of the few. J. Bus. Ethics., v. 37, p. 39–49.
CARTER, D. A.; SIMKINS, B. J.; SIMPSON, W. G. (2003) Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financ. Rev., v. 38, p. 33–53.
CLAESSENS, S.; YURTOGLU, B. B. (2013) Corporate governance in emerging markets: A survey. Emerg. Mark. Rev., v. 15, p. 1–33.
DAILY, C. M.; CERTO, S. T.; DALTON, D. R. (1999) A decade of corporate women: Some progress in the boardroom, none in the executive suite. Strateg. Manag. J., p. 93–99.
DALTON, D. R.; DAILY, C. M.; ELLSTRAND, A. E.; JOHNSON, J. L. (1998) Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strateg. Manag. J., v. 19, p. 269–290.
DARMIDI, S. (2010) Do women in top management affect firm performance.
DOLDOR, E.; VINNICOMBE, S.; GAUGHAN, M.; SEALY, R. (2012) Gender diversity on boards: The appointment process and the role of executive search firms. Equal. Hum. Rights Comm. Res. Rep., v. 85.
EAGLY, A. (1987) Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation, Lawrance Erlbaum Associates. Hillsdale NJ.
EAGLY, A. H.; JOHNSON, B. T. (1990) Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. CHIP Documents. Paper 11.
EAGLY, A. H.; KARAU, S. J.; MAKHIJANI, M. G. (1995) Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: a meta-analysis. American Psychological Association.
ERHARDT, N. L.; WERBEL, J. D.; SHRADER, C. B. (2003) Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corp. Gov. Int. Rev., v. 11, p. 102–111.
FONDAS, N.; SASSALOS, S. (2000) A different voice in the boardroom: How the presence of women directors affects board influence over management. Glob. Focus, v. 12, p. 13–22.
FRANCOEUR, C.; LABELLE, R.; SINCLAIR-DESGAGNÉ, B. (2008) Gender diversity in corporate governance and top management. J. Bus. Ethics., v. 81, p. 83–95.
GALLEGO-ÁLVAREZ, I.; GARCÍA-SÁNCHEZ, I. M.; RODRÍGUEZ-DOMINGUEZ, L. (2010) The influence of gender diversity on corporate performance. Rev. Contab., v. 13, p. 53–88.
GMI (GOVERNANCE METRICS INTERNATIONAL) (2013) GMI ratings’ 2013 women on boards survey, available at: http://www.communitybusiness.org/library/other_publication/gmiratings_wob_03(2012)pd f (accessed 15 August 2014). - Google Scholar [WWW Document], n.d. URL
GOLDIN, C.; KATZ, L. F. (2008) Transitions: Career and family life cycles of the educational elite. Am. Econ. Rev., v. 98, p. 363–369.
HERMALIN, B. E.; WEISBACH, M. S. (2001) Boards of directors as an endogenously determined institution: A survey of the economic literature. National Bureau of Economic Research.
HILLMAN, A. J.; CANNELLA JR., A. A.; HARRIS, I. C. (2002) Women and racial minorities in the boardroom: How do directors differ? J. Manag., v. 28, p. 747–763.
IBARRA, H. (1993) Personal networks of women and minorities in management: A conceptual framework. Acad. Manage. Rev., v. 18, p. 56–87.
JACKSON, S. E. (1992) Consequences of group composition for the interpersonal dynamics of strategic issue processing. Adv. Strateg. Manag., v. 8, p. 345–382.
JENSEN, M. C.; MECKLING, W. H. (1976) Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J. Financ. Econ., v. 3, p. 305–360.
LEE, J. S.; LAN, L. L.; ROWLEY, C. (2014) Why might females say no to corporate board positions? The Asia Pacific in comparison. Asia Pac. Bus. Rev., v. 20, p. 513–522.
LIAO, L.; LUO, L.; TANG, Q. (2015) Gender diversity, board independence, environmental committee and greenhouse gas disclosure. Br. Account. Rev., v. 47, p. 409–424.
MOHAMED, Z.; CLAYTON, G. J.; ISA, M. Y. M. (2015) Embedding Economic Excellence: A Transformational Definition of “Corporate Governance” for Malaysia. J. Mod. Account. Audit., v. 11, p. 124–129.
NAHAR ABDULLAH, S. (2004) Board composition, CEO duality and performance among Malaysian listed companies. Corp. Gov. Int. J. Bus. Soc., v. 4, p. 47–61.
NIELSEN, S.; HUSE, M. (2010) The contribution of women on boards of directors: Going beyond the surface. Corp. Gov. Int. Rev., v. 18, p. 136–148.
REGUERA-ALVARADO, N.; DE FUENTES, P.; LAFFARGA, J. (2017ª) Does board gender diversity influence financial performance? Evidence from Spain. J. Bus. Ethics, v. 141, p. 337.
REGUERA-ALVARADO, N.; DE FUENTES, P.; LAFFARGA, J. (2017b) Does board gender diversity influence financial performance? Evidence from Spain. J. Bus. Ethics, v. 141, p. 337–350.
ROSE, C. (2007) Does female board representation influence firm performance? The Danish evidence. Corp. Gov. Int. Rev., v. 15, p. 404–413.
SHAFIQUE, Y.; IDRESS, S.; YOUSAF, H. (2014) Impact of boards gender diversity on firms profitability: Evidence from banking sector of Pakistan.
SHRADER, C. B.; BLACKBURN, V. B.; ILES, P. (1997) Women in management and firm financial performance: An exploratory study. J. Manag., p. 355–372.
SMITH, N.; SMITH, V.; VERNER, M. (2006) Do women in top management affect firm performance? A panel study of 2,500 Danish firms. Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag., v. 55, p. 569–593.
SRINIDHI, B.; GUL, F. A.; TSUI, J. (2011) Female directors and earnings quality. Contemp. Account. Res., v. 28, p. 1610–1644.
TERJESEN, S.; COUTO, E. B.; FRANCISCO, P. M. (2016) Does the presence of independent and female directors impact firm performance? A multi-country study of board diversity. J. Manag. Gov., v. 20, p. 447–483.
TERJESEN, S.; SEALY, R.; SINGH, V. (2009ª) Women directors on corporate boards: A review and research agenda. Corp. Gov. Int. Rev., v. 17, p. 320–337.
UJUNWA, A.; OKOYEUZU, C.; NWAKOBY, I. (2012) Corporate board diversity and firm performance: Evidence from Nigeria. Rev. Manag. Comp. Int., v. 13, p. 605.
VIRTANEN, A. (2012) Women on the boards of listed companies: Evidence from Finland. J. Manag. Gov., v. 16, p. 571–593.
VISHWAKARMA, R. (2017) Women on Board and its Impact on Performance: Evidence from Microfinance Sector. Indian J. Corp. Gov., 0974686217701465.
VON BERGEN, C. W.; SOPER, B.; PARNELL, J. A. (2005) Workforce diversity and organisational performance. Equal Oppor. Int., v. 24, p. 1–16.
WESTPHAL, J. D.; MILTON, L. P. (2000) How experience and network ties affect the influence of demographic minorities on corporate boards. Adm. Sci. Q., v. 45, p. 366–398.
YASSER, Q. R. (2012) Affects of female directors on firms performance in Pakistan. Brows. Download This Pap.
YERMACK, D. (1996) Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. J. Financ. Econ., v. 40, p. 185–211.
ZAHRA, S. A.; STANTON, W. W. (1988). The implications of board of directors composition for corporate strategy and performance. Int. J. Manag., v. 5, p. 229–236.