Efficiency in equipment import processes: UNIVASF's case
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to describe and analyze the administrative flow of equipment import process at UNIVASF considering the principle of administrative efficiency. A qualitative single case study research was carried out, with a survey and analysis of actions, administrative acts developed into equipment import processes, from 2004 to 2014, to foster, and support scientific, technological and innovation research at UNIVASF. The results show that the principle of efficiency, a promise of the new managerialism, does not resonate with the evidences pointed out in this research, due to the higher time spent to perform the phases, especially the fiscal one, due to obstacles in the administrative and legal systems.
Downloads
Article Details
1. Proposal of Policy for Free Access Periodics
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in an institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
Proposal of Policy for Periodic that offer Postponed Free Access
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 [SPECIFY TIME HERE] after the publication, allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
d. They allow some kind of open dissemination. Authors can disseminate their articles in open access, but with specific conditions imposed by the editor that are related to:
Version of the article that can be deposited in the repository:
Pre-print: before being reviewed by pairs.
Post-print: once reviewed by pairs, which can be:
The version of the author that has been accepted for publication.
The editor's version, that is, the article published in the magazine.
At which point the article can be made accessible in an open manner: before it is published in the magazine, immediately afterwards or if a period of seizure is required, which can range from six months to several years.
Where to leave open: on the author's personal web page, only departmental websites, the repository of the institution, the file of the research funding agency, among others.
References
ALMEIDA, C. P. M. et al. (2013) Experience of importing research equipment at ELSA-Brazil. Rev. Public Health, São Paulo, v. 47, suppl. 2, jun. Available at: https://repositorio.ufba.br/ri/handle/ri/14257. Accessed on: 05/04/2015
BATISTA JÚNIOR. (2012) The Constitutional principle of administrative efficiency. Belo Horizonte: Forum.
BRAZIL. Constitution (1988) Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil. Brasília, DF: Senate, 1988. Official Gazette [of] the Federative Republic of Brazil, Brasília, DF, 05 Oct. 1988. Available at: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/Constituicao/Constituicao.html. Accessed on: 01/02/2019. Accessed on: 01/02/2019.
BRAZIL. Law nº 8.666, of June 21, (1993) Regulates art. 37, item XXI, of the Federal Constitution, establishes rules for bids and contracts in the Public Administration and other measures. Official Gazette [of] Federative Republic of Brazil, Brasilia, DF, June 22, 1993, rectified July 6, 1994. Available at: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/L8666cons. htm. Accessed on: 01/02/2019
BRAZIL. Resolution nº 466 of December 12, (2012) Guidelines and regulatory standards for research involving human beings. Official Gazette [of] Federative Republic of Brazil, Brasilia, DF, 13 June. 2013, Section 1, p. 59. Available at: http://conselho.saude.gov.br/resolucoes/2012/Reso466.pdf. Accessed on: 09/08/2018.
OAK, W. W. (2013) Changes to continuing administrative contracts: a discussion of the determination of the initial value of the contract. 2013. 85 f. Dissertation (Professional Master in Public Administration) - Graduate Program of the Professional Master in Public Administration, Federal University of Lavras. Available at: http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/1013. Accessed on: 02/01/2017.
DI PIETRO, M. S. Z. (2014) Administrative Law. São Paulo: Atlas.
FURTADO, L. R. (2013) Course of administrative law. 4. ed., Rev. current. Belo Horizonte: Forum.
JUSTEN FILHO, M. (2009) Comments on the bidding law and administrative contracts. 13. ed. São Paulo: Dialectic.
LIMA, M. L. (2014) Exploratory study of the difficulties of developing scientific research funded with non-reimbursable funds under the FINEP agreement. 133 f. Dissertation (Master) - School of Public and Business Administration, Center for Academic Training and Research, Fundação Getúlio Vargas. Available at: http://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/dspace/handle/10438/11821. Access on: 03/01/2017.
LUKE, B.; KEARINS, K.; VERREYNNE, M. L. (2011) The risks and returns of new public management: political business. International Journal of Public Sector Management, v. 24, n. 4, p. 325-355. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513551111133489. Access on: 02/01/2017.
MELLO, C. B. (2006) Course of administrative law. São Paulo: Malheiros, 2006.
MENDES, V. L. (2000) Managerial innovation in public administration: a study in the municipal sphere in Brazil. 2000. 325 f. Thesis (Doctorate in Business Administration) - Graduate School of Business Administration, School of Business, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador.
MONOBAYEVA, A.; HOWARD, C. (2015) Are Post-Soviet Republics Ready for the New Public Management? The Case of Educational Modernization in Kazakhstan. International Journal of Public Sector Management, v. 28, n. 2. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-08- 2014-0102. Accessed on: 02/01/2016.
REZENDE, A. A.; CORRÊA, C. R.; DANIEL, L. P. (2013) The impacts of technological innovation policy on federal universities: an analysis of mining institutions. Journal of Economics and Administration, São Paulo, v. 12, n. 1, p.100-131.
VERMA, D.; SINHA, K. K. (2002) Toward a theory of project interdependencies in high tech R&D environments. Journal of Operations Management, v. 20, n. 5, p. 451-468. Available at: http:// www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S0272696302000244. Accessed on: 25/10/2017.
YIN, R. K. (2010) Case study: planning and methods. Porto Alegre: Bookman.