Clustering the technical capability in the brazilian aeronautical maintenance industry

Main Article Content

Marcio Cardoso Machado
Ligia Maria Soto Urbina
Rodrigo Scarpel
صندلی اداری

Abstract

In the sectors where equipment requiring services of maintenance are technologically complex and advanced, such as in the air transportation, knowing and managing the technical capability of the enterprises of the sector can be a good way maximizing the efforts of training. This paper attempts to present a process of technical capability clustering for the aeronautical maintenance industry, in order to provide a usable overview of the sector competences. The findings present a unique insight into the understanding of competences clustering that may be used across different industries.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Marcio Cardoso Machado, INSTITUTO TECNOLÓGICO DE AERONÁUTICA

Professor of Production Department at Mechanical Engineering Division, Aeronautical Institute of Technology, São José dos Campos, São Paulo, Brazil

Ligia Maria Soto Urbina, INSTITUTO TECNOLÓGICO DE AERONÁUTICA

Professor of Production Department at Mechanical Engineering Division, Aeronautical Institute of Technology, São José dos Campos, São Paulo, Brazil

Rodrigo Scarpel, INSTITUTO TECNOLÓGICO DE AERONÁUTICA

Professor of Production Department, Mechanical Engineering Division, Aeronautical Institute of Technology, São José dos Campos, São Paulo, Brazil

References

ANAC (2010). Empresa de Manutenção. Relação de Empresas de Manutenção Aeronáutica Certificadas. Available: <http://www.anac.gov.br>. Access: 19 may, 2010.

BRAZIL (2003a) Comando da Aeronáutica. RBHA 121: requisitos operacionais: operações domésticas, de bandeira e suplementares. Brasília-DF, 2003.

BRAZIL (2003b) Comando da Aeronáutica. RBHA 121: requisitos operacionais: operações complementares e por demanda. Brasília-DF, 2003.

BRAZIL (2005) Comando da Aeronáutica. RBHA 145: empresas de manutenção de aeronaves. Brasília-DF, 2005.

CHANG, Y. H.; WANG, Y. C. (2010). Significant human risk factors in aircraft maintenance technicians. Safety Science, v. 48, n. 1, p. 54-62.

DE BRUECKER, P.; VAN DEN BERGH, J.; BELIEN, J.; DEMEULEMEESTER, E. (2012). A model enhancement heuristic for building robust aircraft maintenance personnel rosters under stochastic constraints. status: published. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Aircraft Operations Management (AOM) v. 1 p. 60-63.

DURAND, J. M. (2008) Aircraft Maintenance Organizational Structure Changes: An Antecedent Model. Dissertation (Master in Engineering). Ohio: AFIT.

EURESPACE. (2003) The human factors in aeronautical maintenance study. Ref.: NT/1354A/03/021 Rev.B 07 outubro.

FÁVARO, L. P. et al. (2009) Análise de dados: modelagem multivariada para tomada de decisões. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier.

JACOB, C.; DUBOIS, D.; CARDOSO, J.; CEBERIO, M.; KREINOVICH, V. (2011). Estimating probability of failure of a complex system based on partial information about subsystems and components, with potential applications to aircraft maintenance. Departmental Technical Reports (CS). Paper 615. http://digitalcommons.utep.edu/cs_techrep/615.

KNOTTS, R. M. H. (1999) Civil aircraft maintenance and support: fault diagnosis from a business perspective. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, v. 5, n. 4, p. 335-347.

MACHADO, M. C.; URBINA, L. M.; ANDRADE, D.; LUCHT, R. R. (2009) Avaliação de empresas de manutenção aeronáutica Anais do 2009 SBEAE. Brazilian Symposium on Aerospace Enginneering & Applications, São José dos Campos.

MINGOTI, S. A.; LIMA, J. O. (2006) Comparing SOM neural network with Fuzzy c-means, K-means and traditional hierarchical clustering algorithms. European Journal of Operational Research, v. 174, n. 3, p. 1742-1759.

MISHRA, R. P.; ANAND, G.; KODALI, R. (2006) Development of a framework for world-class maintenance systems. Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems, v. 5, n. 2, p. 141–165.

MOAYED, F. A.; SHELL, R. L. (2009) Comparison and evaluation of maintenance operations in lean versus non-lean production systems. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, v. 15, n. 3, p. 285-296.

MUCHIRI, P.; PINTELON, L.; GELDERS, L.; MARTIN, H. (2011). Development of maintenance function performance measurement framework and indicators. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 131, n. 1, p. 295-302.

NIU, G.; YANG, B. S.; PECHT, M. (2010). Development of an optimized condition-based maintenance system by data fusion and reliability-centered maintenance. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, v. 95, n. 7, p. 786-796.

PAPAKOSTAS, N.; PAPACHATZAKIS, P.; XANTHAKIS, V.; MOURTZIS, D.; CHRYSSOLOURIS, G. (2010) An approach to operational aircraft maintenance planning. Decision Support Systems, v. 48, n. 4, p. 604-612.

PHILLIPS, P.; DISTON, D.; STARR, A.; PAYNE, J.; PANDYA, S. (2010). A review on the optimisation of aircraft maintenance with application to landing gears. In Engineering Asset Lifecycle Management (p. 68-76). Springer London.

RODRIGUES, L. R.; GOMES, J. P. P.; DE OLIVEIRA BIZARRIA, C.; GALVAO, R.; YONEYAMA, T.(2010), Using prognostic system and decision analysis techniques in aircraft maintenance cost-benefit models. In: AEROSPACE CONFERENCE, 2010 IEEE , v. 1, n. 7, p. 6-13.

SAMARANAYAKE, P. (2006) Current practices and problem areas in aircraft maintenance planning and scheduling: interfaced/integrated system perspective. In: INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, Proceedings of the 7th asia-pacific conference in bangkok, UWS, Sidney, p. 2245-2256. Thailand: 2006.

SAMARANAYAKE, P.; et al. (2007), Reliability improvements in aircraft maintenance planning and scheduling under uncertainty, In: QUALITY AND RELIABILITY Proceedings of the V International Conference in Chiang Mai, UWS, Sidney, p. 49-55. Thailand: 2007.

SHERWIN, D. (2000), A review of overall models for maintenance management. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, v. 6, n. 3, p. 138-164.

SORO, I. W.; NOURELFATH, M.; Aït-KADI, D. (2010). Performance evaluation of multi-state degraded systems with minimal repairs and imperfect preventive maintenance. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, v. 95, n. 2, p. 65-69.

VILELA, J. A. B. M., et al., (2010) Manutenção em aeronaves: fator contribuinte para a Segurança de Aviação, Revista Conexão SIPAER, v. 1, n. 2, p. 85-99.

VOSS, C.; TSIKRIKTSIS, N.; FROHLICH, M. (2002) Case Research in Operations Management, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, v. 22, n. 2, p. 195-219.

WARD, M.; McDONALD, N.; MORRISON, R.; GAYNOR, D.; NUGENT, T. (2010). A performance improvement case study in aircraft maintenance and its implications for hazard identification. Ergonomics, v. 53, n. 2, p. 247-267.

WEBB, A. (2002) Statistical pattern recognition. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

WEDEL, M. and KAMAKURA, W. A. (2000) Market segmentation: Conceptual and methodological foundations. Massachusetts: Hingham Kluwer Academic.

فروشگاه اینترنتی