Identification of external critical success factors in biotechnology firms
Main Article Content
Abstract
Downloads
Article Details
1. Proposal of Policy for Free Access Periodics
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in an institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
Proposal of Policy for Periodic that offer Postponed Free Access
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 [SPECIFY TIME HERE] after the publication, allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
d. They allow some kind of open dissemination. Authors can disseminate their articles in open access, but with specific conditions imposed by the editor that are related to:
Version of the article that can be deposited in the repository:
Pre-print: before being reviewed by pairs.
Post-print: once reviewed by pairs, which can be:
The version of the author that has been accepted for publication.
The editor's version, that is, the article published in the magazine.
At which point the article can be made accessible in an open manner: before it is published in the magazine, immediately afterwards or if a period of seizure is required, which can range from six months to several years.
Where to leave open: on the author's personal web page, only departmental websites, the repository of the institution, the file of the research funding agency, among others.
References
AUDRETSCH, D. B.; STEPHAN, P. E. (1996). Company-scientist locational links: The case of biotechnology. The American Economic Review, v. 86, n. 3, p. 641-652.
BECK, S. J.; LAUDICINA, R. J. (2001). Passing the torch: Mentoring the next generation of laboratory professionals. Clinical Laboratory Science, v. 14, n. 1, p. 33-37.
CARTER, C. R.; KALE, R.; GRIMM, C. M. (2000). Environmental purchasing and firm performance: an empirical investigation. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, v. 36, n. 3, p. 219-228.
CVILIKAS, A.; KARPAVIČIUS, T.; GATAUTIS, R. (2007). Application of systemic management conception to organization’s management decisions structuring. Engineering Economics, v. 4, n. 54, p. 44.
DARKE, P.; SHANKS, G.; BROADBENT, M. (1998). Successfully completing case study research: combining rigor, relevance and pragmatism. Information Systems Journal, n. 8, p. 273-289.
EISENHARDT, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of management review, v. 14, n. 4, p. 532-550.
FÁRI M. G.; KRALOVÁNSZKY U. P. (2006). The founding father of biotechnology: Károly (Karl) Ereky. International Journal of Horticultural Science, v. 12, n. 1, p. 9-12.
FARSI, J. Y.; MODARRESI, M.; MOTEVASSELI, M.; SALAMZADEH, A. (2013). Institutional Factors Affecting Academic Entrepreneurship: The Case of University of Tehran. Economic Analysis, v. 46, n. 3/4, Forthcoming.
GEORGE, G.; ZAHRA, S. A.; WOOD, D. R. (2002). The effects of business–university alliances on innovative output and financial performance: a study of publicly traded biotechnology companies. Journal of Business Venturing, v. 17, n. 6, p. 577-609.
GREIF, K. F.; MERZ, J. F. (2007). Current Controversies in the Biological Sciences: Case Studies of Policy Challenges from New Technologies. MIT Press.
KAMERY, R. H. (2004). Employee Motivation as it Relates to Effectiveness, Efficiency, Productivity, and Performance. Academy of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, p. 139.
KOLLMER, H.; DOWLING, M. (2004). Licensing as a commercialisation strategy for new technology-based firms. Research Policy, v. 33, n. 8, p. 1141-1151.
LECHLER, T. (2001). Social interaction: A determinant of entrepreneurial team venture success. Small Business Economics, v. 16, n. 4, p. 263-278.
LEVITAS, E.; MCFADYEN, M. (2009). Managing liquidity in research‐intensive firms: signaling and cash flow effects of patents and alliance activities. Strategic Management Journal, v. 30, n. 6, p. 659-678.
MAHBOUDI, F.; HAMEDIFAR, H.; AGHAJANI, H. (2012). Medical Biotechnology Trends and Achievements in Iran. Avicenna Journal of Medical Biotechnology, v. 4, n. 4, p. 200-205.
MALO, S.; NORUS, J. (2009). Growth dynamics of dedicated biotechnology firms in transition economies. Evidence from the Baltic countries and Poland. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, v. 21, n. 5/6, p. 481-502.
MANGEMATIN, V.; LEMARIÉ, S.; BOISSIN, J. P.; CATHERINE, D.; COROLLEUR, F.; CORONINI, R.; TROMMETTER, M. (2003). Development of SMEs and heterogeneity of trajectories: the case of biotechnology in France. Research Policy, v. 32, n. 4, p. 621-638.
Martin, J. (1992). Cultures in organizations: Three perspectives. Oxford University Press, USA.
MROCZKOWSKI, T. (2010). Key Success Factors in Polish Biotech Ventures. Studia Ekonomiczne, n. 1, p. 57-80.
MROCZKOWSKI, T.; ELMS, H. (2009). Tracking progress: Two approaches to biotechnology development–Cases from Central Europe. Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, v. 15, n. 3, p. 227-235.
NIOSI, J.; BAS, T. G. (2001). The competencies of regions–Canada's clusters in biotechnology. Small Business Economics, v. 17, n. 1, p. 31-42.
PERSAUD, A. (2001). The knowledge gap. Foreign Affairs, p. 107-117.
POWELL, W. W. (1996). Inter-organizational collaboration in the biotechnology industry. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE)/Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft, p. 197-215.
REYMOND, M. A.; STEINERT, R.; ESCOURROU, J.; FOURTANIER, G. (2002). Ethical, legal and economic issues raised by the use of human tissue in postgenomic research. Digestive Diseases, v. 20, n. 3/4, p. 257-265.
ROCKHART, J. F. (1979). Critical Success Factors. Harvard Business Review, March-April, p. 81-91.
SALAMZADEH, A.; SALAMZADEH, Y.; DARAEI, M. (2011). Toward a systematic framework for an Entrepreneurial University: A study in Iranian context with IPOO Model. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal, v. 3, n. 1, p. 31-37.
SHANKS, G.; PARR, A.; H. U. B.; CORBITT, B.; THANASANKIT, T.; SEDDON, P. (2000, July). Differences in critical success factors in ERP systems implementation in Australia and China: a cultural analysis. In Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Information Systems (v. 2000, p. 537-544). Cairo University.
SOOREH, L. K.; SALAMZADEH, A.; SAFARZADEH, H.; SALAMZADEH, Y. (2011). Defining and Measuring Entrepreneurial Universities: A Study in Iranian context using Importance-Performance Analysis and TOPSIS Technique. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal, v. 3, n. 2, p. 182-200.
STEVENS, R. E.; LOUDON, D. L.; WILLIAMSON, S. (1998). Getting it done: achieving law firm objectives through the development of effective marketing strategies. Journal of Professional Services Marketing, v. 17, n. 1, p. 105-118.
SVENSSON, T. G. (1986). Ethnopolitics among the Sámi in Scandinavia: A Basic Strategy toward Local Autonomy. Arctic, p. 208-215.
TANHA, D.; SALAMZADEH, A.; ALLAHIAN, Z.; SALAMZADEH, Y. (2011). Commercialization of University Research and Innovations in Iran: Obstacles and Solutions. Journal of Knowledge Management, Economics, and Information Technology, v. 1, n. 7, p. 126-146.
VANDERBYL, S.; KOBELAK, S. (2007). Critical success factors for biotechnology industry in Canada. Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, v. 13, n. 2, p. 68-77.
YIN, R. (1989). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. San Francisco, CA: Sage.
YOUNG, F. E. (1986). Biotechnology: the view from the FDA. Health Matrix, v. 4, n. 3, p. 10-15.