Analytical hierarchy process - bocr applied for the best lean project selection for production lines

Main Article Content

José Antonio de Miranda Lammoglia
Nilson Brandalise
Cecilia Toledo Hernandez
صندلی اداری

Abstract

The scenario of global competitiveness demands more and more of the organizations the search for continuous improvement. For survival, in the face of adverse market conditions, modern production management strategies are essential to make production processes increasingly efficient, lean and sustainable, minimizing losses in their production systems. In this sense, when thinking about changes in production lines, in search of improvements in their process, criteria that provide Benefits, Opportunities, Costs and Risks (BOCR) should be considered. In this way, managers and executives should rely on tools and methods that allow them to guide their decisions in a clear way. The objective of this work is to apply a method of Decision Making with Multiple Criteria to the alternatives of investment projects in production lines in Lean Manufacturing concept. As a general result, it was possible to observe the applicability of the AHP BOCR method for the decision-making case involving several criteria and subcriteria for choosing the Lean investment project in the steel environment, the preferred alternative being the discontinuity of the production line 1 and the absorption of their respective production volume by production lines 2 and 3 through investments in them.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

CAMILO, H. F. et al. (2017) Assessment of photovoltaic distributed generation – Issues of grid connected systems through the consumer side applied to a case study of Brazil. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, v. 71, n. December 2016, p. 712–719.

GHOBADIAN, A. et al. (2018) Examining legitimatisation of additive manufacturing in the interplay between innovation, lean manufacturing and sustainability. International Journal of Production Economics, n. July 2017, p. 1–12.

GNANAVELBABU, A.; ARUNAGIRI, P. (2018) Ranking of MUDA using AHP and Fuzzy AHP algorithm. Materials Today: Proceedings, v. 5, n. 5, p. 13406–13412.

KHAN, M. I. (2018) Evaluating the strategies of compressed natural gas industry using an integrated SWOT and MCDM approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 172, p. 1035–1052.

MEDEIROS, H. DA S.; SANTANA, A. F. B.; GUIMARÃES, L. DA S. (2017) O uso dos métodos de custeio nas indústrias de manufatura enxuta: uma análise da literatura. Gestão & Produção, v. 24, n. 2, p. 395–406.

MOSTAFA, S.; DUMRAK, J.; SOLTAN, H. (2015) Lean Maintenance Roadmap. Procedia Manufacturing, v. 2, n. February, p. 434–444.

MUFAZZAL, S.; MUZAKKIR, S. M. (2018) A new multi-criterion decision making (MCDM) method based on proximity indexed value for minimizing rank reversals. Computers and Industrial Engineering, v. 119, n. November 2017, p. 427–438.

PEREIRA, A. S. A.; BRANDALISE, N.; MELLO, L. C. B. DE B. (2017) Aplicação do método AHP na seleção de terrenos para edificações comerciais na cidade do Rio de Janeiro. Sistemas & Gestão, v. 11, n. 4, p. 410.

SHAHSAVARI, M. H.; KHAMEHCHI, E. (2018) Optimum selection of sand control method using a combination of MCDM and DOE techniques. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, v. 171, n. January, p. 229–241.

SILVA, A. C. S.; NASCIMENTO, L. P. A. DA S.; BELDERRAIN, M. C. N. (2010) Aplicação do método analytic network process (ANP) com abordagem BOCR no contexto militar. Simpósio De Pesquisa Operacional E Logística Da Marinha, p. 11.

SUÁREZ-BARRAZA, M. F. et al. (2016) In search of “Muda” through the TKJ diagram. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, v. 8, n. 3, p. 377–394.

WIJNMALEN, D. J. D. (2007) Analysis of benefits, opportunities, costs, and risks (BOCR) with the AHP-ANP: A critical validation. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, v. 46, n. 7–8, p. 892–905.

YADAV, G.; SETH, D.; DESAI, T. N. Prioritising solutions for Lean Six Sigma adoption barriers through fuzzy AHP-modified TOPSIS framework. [s.l: s.n.]. v. 9

Most read articles by the same author(s)

فروشگاه اینترنتی