English language assessment in business context: a case study
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Although English language is considered an essential requirement to find a position in the Brazilian work market, little do we know about what proficiency level is expected from workers by companies and how language assessment occurs at work. This investigation was developed in an automation company located in São Paulo metropolitan area. It is a case study which aimed to better understand the language use expectations and analyze the assessment process to identify: the assessment tools used in the company, its language view and if the assessment process meets the company’s language use expectations. This study uses questionnaires, interviews and documents analysis for data collection and triangulation of sources. The company is a place where English is used in daily tasks due to international partnerships and taught in an in-company course. The results show a mismatch between the proficiency and achievement tests applied in the company and its language view. In addition English language is a gatekeeper in recruitment process only for some positions. The language use expectations for workers vary according to their position and department but are not assessed likewise.
Downloads
Article Details
1. Proposal of Policy for Free Access Periodics
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in an institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
Proposal of Policy for Periodic that offer Postponed Free Access
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 [SPECIFY TIME HERE] after the publication, allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
d. They allow some kind of open dissemination. Authors can disseminate their articles in open access, but with specific conditions imposed by the editor that are related to:
Version of the article that can be deposited in the repository:
Pre-print: before being reviewed by pairs.
Post-print: once reviewed by pairs, which can be:
The version of the author that has been accepted for publication.
The editor's version, that is, the article published in the magazine.
At which point the article can be made accessible in an open manner: before it is published in the magazine, immediately afterwards or if a period of seizure is required, which can range from six months to several years.
Where to leave open: on the author's personal web page, only departmental websites, the repository of the institution, the file of the research funding agency, among others.
References
ADELMAN, C.; JENKINS, D.; KEMMIS, S. (1976) Rethinking case study: notes from the second Cambridge conference. Cambridge Journal of Education, v. 6, n. 3, p. 139-150.
ANASTASI, A. (1976) Psychological testing. New York: Macmillan.
BRYMAN, A. (1988) Quantity and Quality in Social Research. London: Unwin Hyman Publications.
COLE, G.; NEUFELD, D. (1991) Les tests d’evaluation de langue second de la function publique du Canada. Actes du Colloque Bulletin: Association quebequoise des enseignants du francais langue seconde. Ottawa: University of Ottawa.
DENZIN, N. K. (1978) Sociological methods. Nova York: McGraw-Hill.
DOUGLAS, D. (2000) Assessing Language for Specific Purpose. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
DOWSETT, G. (1986) Interaction in semi-structured interview. In: M. Emery: Qualitative Research. Canberra: Australian Association of Adult Education.
GRADDOL, D. (2000) The future of English? The British Council.
HUGHES, A. (1988) Achievement and Proficiency: The Missing Link? In Hughes, A. (ed) Testing English for University Study. ELT Documents: 127. Modern English
HUGHES, A. (1989) Testing for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
LINCOLN, Y. S.; GUBA, E. G. (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage.
MADAUS, G. (1988) The influence of testing on the curriculum. In: TANNER, L. N. (ed). Critical issues in curriculum. Chicago: Chicago University Press, p. 83-11.
MCNAMARA, T. (1990) Item Response Theory and the validation of an ESP test for health professionals. Language Testing, v. 7, p. 52-77.
MCNAMARA, T. (2000) Language Testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
MCNAMARA, T. (1999) Performance Testing. Encyclopedia of Language and Education, v. 7, p. 132-137.
NUNAN, D. (1992) Research Methods in Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
PICKET, D. (1986) Business English: falling between two styles. Comlon, n. 26.
SAJAAVARA, K. Designing tests to match the needs of the workplace. In: SEIDMAN, I. E. (1991). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York, NY, US: Teachers College Press.
VALETTE, R. M. (1977) Modern Language Testing. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
WIDDOWSON, H. G.(1978) Teaching Language as Communication. London: Oxford University Press.
YIN, R. K. (1984) Case study research: design and methods. California: Sage publications.