Development of evaluation the market value of the enterprise in the system of accounting and analytical support
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article explores the process of development the evaluation of market value of the enterprise in the system of accounting and analytical support. The purpose of our research is to determine the methodology for evaluation the enterprise value that provides a reliable and reasonable calculation of indicators enterprise value based on the data of the accounting system. A hypothesis was formulated, which later on received a confirmation. A comparative analysis of the characteristic features the application of different evaluation approaches of the enterprise (income, cost, market) was carried out. The authors determined that the formation of the market value of the enterprise should be carried out in the system of accounting and analytical support of the enterprise and determined by the indicator of net assets, which should be adjusted to the predicted level of profitability taking into account alternative risk-free investments and the risks level of the enterprise. The proposed concept for determining the market value of the enterprise provides a reliable and reasoned calculation of value indicators based on the data of the accounting system for both profitable and unprofitable enterprises.
Downloads
Article Details
1. Proposal of Policy for Free Access Periodics
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in an institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
Proposal of Policy for Periodic that offer Postponed Free Access
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 [SPECIFY TIME HERE] after the publication, allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
d. They allow some kind of open dissemination. Authors can disseminate their articles in open access, but with specific conditions imposed by the editor that are related to:
Version of the article that can be deposited in the repository:
Pre-print: before being reviewed by pairs.
Post-print: once reviewed by pairs, which can be:
The version of the author that has been accepted for publication.
The editor's version, that is, the article published in the magazine.
At which point the article can be made accessible in an open manner: before it is published in the magazine, immediately afterwards or if a period of seizure is required, which can range from six months to several years.
Where to leave open: on the author's personal web page, only departmental websites, the repository of the institution, the file of the research funding agency, among others.
References
BESYADA, S. (2010) Methods of valuation as the basis for shaping the values of tourism enterprises. Scientific Notebook of the Greater Poland School of Tourism and Management, v. 4, p. 241-256.
CHEBOTAREV, N. F. (2009) Estimation of enterprise (business) value. Moscow: Dashkov and K.
COPELAND, T.; COLLER, T.; MURIN, J. (2005) Cost of Companies: Evaluation and Management. Moscow: Olimp-business.
DAMODARAN, A. (1999) Value Creation and Enhancement: Back to the Future. Los Angeles: Stern School of Business.
EDWARDS, E. O. (1961) The Theory and Measurement of Business Income. University of California Press.
EFIMOVA, M. R.; PETROVA, E. V.; RUMYANTSEV, V. N. (1998) General Theory of Statistics. Moscow: INFRA-M.
EVANS, F. C. H.; BISHOP, D. M. (2009) Evaluation of companies in mergers and acquisitions. Creating value in private companies. Moscow: Alpina.
FEHRENBACHER, D.; SCHULZ, A.; ROTARU, K. R. (2018) The moderating role of decision mode in subjective performance evaluation. Management Accounting Research, v. 41, p. 1-10.
GU, F.; LEV, B. (2002) Intangible Assets. Measurement, Drivers, Usefulness. Boston-New York.
GEORGESCU, I.; PĂVĂLOAIA, L.; ROBU, I. (2014) Fair Value Accounting and Market Reaction: Evidence from Romanian Listed Companies. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, v. 143, p. 827-831.
HOPPER, T.; LASSOU, P.; SOOBAROYEN, T. (2017) Globalisation, accounting and developing countries. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, v. 43, p. 125-148.
HUANG, H. (2018) Accounting and finance theory and practice: Future development. Asia Pacific Management Review, v. 23, p. 71-75.
KOZODAEV, M.; PYLOV, M. (2003) Assessment and business. Moscow: Olma-press Invest: Institute of Economic Strategies.
LEIFER, L. A.; VOZHYK, S. V. (2004) Company valuation. Analysis of various methods using the income hike. Volga Center for Financial Consulting and Assessment. Access: http://www.treko.ru/show_ article_265.
MAJEWSKI, M. (2010) Wycena firm. Academy of the Ministry of Treasury, p. 52-54.
MICHULA, I. (2012) Methods of business valuation as measures of effective activity. In: CONFERENCE “EFFICIENCY AS THE SOURCE OF THE WEALTH OF NATIONS", Piechowice, Proceedings… Piechowice: Manish, 2012.
MYKOLAYEK-GOTSEYN, M. (2010) Market measures of creating goodwill and shareholder value. E-Finances, v. 6, p. 46-63.
NOGALSKY, B.; ZALEWSKI, H. (1998) Capitals and value in the business management process. Gdynia.
PALAMARCHUK, V. P. (2004) Business Assessment: A Tutorial. Moscow: Academy of National Economy under the Government of the Russian Federation.
PALLISSERRY, P. (2012) True and fair financial reporting: a tool for better corporate governance. Journal of Financial Crime, v. 19, n. 4, p. 332-342.
ROSH, J. (2008) Company Value: from desired to real. Minsk: Grevtsov Publisher.
SHCHERBAKOV, V. A.; SHCHERBAKOVA, N. A. (2006) Estimation of the value of an enterprise (business). Moscow: Omega-L.