Key factors for a continuous improvement process

Authors

  • Hector Ricardo Formento National University of General Sarmiento
  • Franco Javier Chiodi National University of General Sarmiento
  • Fernando Juan Cusolito National University of General Sarmiento
  • Lucas Ariel Altube National University of General Sarmiento
  • Sebastian Pablo Gatti National University of General Sarmiento

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v4i2.76

Keywords:

Management, Continuous Improvement, Key Factors, Teamwork

Abstract

The goal of this work was to examine the content of continuous improvement strategies, taking into account the important role they play in building competitiveness. This paper argues that several specific issues must be taken into account in order to reach successful outcomes.

This work starts with a literature review on the matter. On this basis, we designed a survey administered to a group of 30 large companies, each of which is renowned leader in Argentina. Finally, we compared the development of continuous improvement process in companies with very effective results and with scarce results. Differences that emerged from this comparison enabled us to identify critical factors for achieving a successful improvement process.

As there are no recent researches on continuous improvement programs in Argentina, this paper contributes to recognizing and systematizing what has been done, comparing it with theoretical framework and uncovering research gaps for future studies. However, further research must confirm these findings and move forward on the analysis of intangible factors, like: internal communications, climate, culture, self reflexion, consensus, etc.

Author Biographies

Hector Ricardo Formento, National University of General Sarmiento

Mechanical Engineer graduated from the National Technological University, with a postgraduate degree in University Teaching.

Researcher – Senior Lecturer at the Institute of Industry, National University of General Sarmiento. During the past 11 years has led a research team that studies the processes of continuous improvement.

Over the past 25 years he has participated in many congresses and conducted seminars and conferences on continuous improvement in Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, Ecuador and Venezuela. He is currently vice president of SAMECO (Argentine Society pro Continuous Improvement), nonprofit organization that disseminates experiences and knowledge on continuous improvement.

 

Franco Javier Chiodi, National University of General Sarmiento

Chemical engineer, graduated from Faculty of Engineering National University of the Center of Buenos Aires Province. Master in Economics and Industrial Development. PhD student.

Researcher – Associate Professor at the Institute of Industry, National University of General Sarmiento. Member of the research team led by Hector Formento

Fernando Juan Cusolito, National University of General Sarmiento

Mechanical Engineer graduated from the National Technological University Researcher – Associate Professor at the Institute of Industry, National University of General Sarmiento. Member of the research team led by Hector Formento

Lucas Ariel Altube, National University of General Sarmiento

Degree in Economics from the National University of Córdoba. Master in Economics and Industrial Development.

Researcher – Assistant Professor at the Institute of Industry, National University of General Sarmiento. Member of the research team led by Hector Formento

 

Sebastian Pablo Gatti, National University of General Sarmiento

Industrial Engineer graduated from the Faculty of Engineering of the National University of Lomas de Zamora. Master in Industrial Quality.

Researcher – Assistant Professor at the Institute of Industry, National University of General Sarmiento. Member of the research team led by Hector Formento

References

ALBORS GARRIGOS, J.; HERVAS OLIVER J. L.; SEGARRA OÑA, M. (2009) Análisis de las prácticas de mejora continua en España. Economía Industrial, n. 373, p. 185-195.

ANAND, G.; WARD, P.; TATIKONDA, M.; SHILLING, D. (2009) Dynamic capabilities through continuous improvement infrastructure. Journal of Operations Management, v. 27, n. 6, p. 444–461.

ATTARAN, M. (2003) Information technology and business-process redesign. Business Process Management Journal, v. 9, n. 4, p. 440–459.

BACDAYAN, P. (2001) Quality improvement teams that stall due to poor project selection: an exploration of contributing factors. Total Quality Management, v. 12, n. 5, p. 589–598.

BATEMAN, N. (2005) Sustainability: the elusive element of process improvement. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 25, n. 3, p. 261–276.

BATEMAN, N.; RICH N. (2003) Companies’ perceptions of inhibitors and enablers for process improvement activities. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 23, n. 2, p. 185–199.

BASHEIN, B.; MARKUS, L.; RILEY, P. (1994) Preconditions for BPR success and how to prevent failures. Information System Management, v. 11, n. 2, p. 7–13.

BESSANT, J.; CAFFYN, S.; GALLAGHER, M. (2001) An evolutionary model of continuous improvement behaviour. Technovation, v. 21, n. 2, p. 67–77.

BESSANT, J.; FRANCIS, D. (1999) Developing strategic continuous improvement capability. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 19, n. 11, p. 1106–1119.

BHUIYAN, N.; BAGHEL, A. (2005) An overview of continuous improvement: from the past to the Present. Management Decision, v. 43, n. 5, p. 761–771.

BUCH, K.; SPANGLER, R. (1990) The effects of quality circles on performance and promotions. Human Relations, v. 43, n. 6, p. 573–582.

BUCKLER, B. (1996) A learning process model to achieve continuous improvement and innovation. The Learning Organization. v. 3, n. 3, p. 31-39.

CHOI, T. (1995) Conceptualizing continuous improvement: Implications for organizational change. Omega, v. 23, n. 6, p. 607-624.

CHOO, A.; LINDERMAN, K.; SCHROEDER, R. (2007) Method and context perspectives on learning and knowledge creation in quality management. Journal of Operations Management, v. 25, n. 4, p. 918–931.

DAS, A.; HANDFIELD, R.; CALANTONE, R.; GHOSH, S. (2000) A contingent view of quality management—the impact of international competition on quality. Decision Sciences, v. 31, n. 3, p. 649–690.

DAVISON, S.; GORDON, J. L.; ROBINSON, J. A. (2005) Studying continuous improvement from a knowledge perspective. Knowledge-Based Systems, v. 18, n. 4-5, p. 197-206.

DEMING, W. E. (1993) The new economics. Cambridge: MIT Center for advanced engineering study.

DENNIS, A.; CARTE, T.; KELLY, C. (2003) Breaking the rules: Success and failure in group-ware-supported BRP. Decision Support Systems, v. 36, n. 1, p. 31–48.

EVANS, J. R.; LINDSAY, W. R. (2008) Managing for quality and performance excellence. SW: Thomson.

FAIRBANK, J.; WILLIAMS, S. (2001) Motivating creativity and enhancing innovation through employee suggestion system technology. Creativity & Innovation Management, v. 10, n. 2, p. 68.

Formento, H. (2008). Tendencias en el uso de herramientas para mejora e innovación. Inaugural conference 13th congress of SAMECO-Argentine Society for Continuous Improvement. Buenos Aires: Oct., 2008. Available: http://mejoracontinuatotal.blogspot.com/2012/03/estadisticas-sobre-el-uso-de.html

FORMENTO, H.; ALTUBE, L.; BRAIDOT, N.; NICOLINI, J. (2006) Estudio sobre los resultados y la correlación de variables de un modelo diagnóstico específico para PyMEs aplicado a distintas áreas de actividad industrial. LITTEC IFI 2-Research´s laboratory on technology, work, enterprise and competitiveness (Research paper 2). Available: http://www.littec.ungs.edu.ar/pdfespa%F1ol/IFI%2002-2006%20Formento-Braidot-Nicollini-Altube.pdf

FORMENTO, H.; BRAIDOT, N.; PITTALUGA, J. (2007) El proceso de mejora continua en PyMEs Argentinas: Investigaciones y modelos posibles. Buenos Aires: UNGS.

FORMENTO, H.; BRAIDOT, N.; FARDELLI, C.; CUSOLITO, F. (2007) Equipos de mejora contínua: Reglas para trabajo en equipo y resolución de problemas. Buenos Aires: UNGS.

FORRESTER, R. (2000) Capturing learning and applying knowledge: an investigation of the use of innovation teams in Japanese and American automotive firms. Journal of Business Research, v. 47, n. 1, p. 35–45.

FOSTER, S. T. (2004) Managing Quality: An Integrative Approach. NY: Prentice Hall.

GARCÍA-SABATER, J.; MARIN-GARCIA, J. (2009) Facilitadores y barreras para la sostenibilidad de la mejora continua: Un estudio cualitativo en proveedores del automóvil de la Comunidad Valenciana. Intangible Capital, v. 5, n. 2, 183–209.

GARVIN, D. A. (1993) Building a learning organization. Harvard Business Review, v. 71, n. 4, p. 78–91.

GRUTTER, A.; FIELD, J.; FAULL, N. (2002) Work team performance over time: three case studies of South African manufacturers. Journal of Operations Management, v. 20, n. 5, p. 641–657.

HAMMER, M.; STANTON, S. (1999) How process enterprise really work. Harvard Business Review, v. 77, n. 6, p. 108–119.

HANDEL, M.; GITTLEMAN, M. (2004) Is there a wage payoff to innovative work practices?. Industrial Relations, v. 43, n. 1, p. 67–97.

IMAI, M. (1986) Kaizen: the key to Japan’s competitive success. NY: Random House.

ISHIKAWA, K. (1986) ¿Qué es el control total de calidad?: la modalidad Japonesa. Bogota: Norma.

JABROUNI, H.; KAMSU-FOGUEM, B.; GENESTE, L.; VAYSSE, C. (2011) Continuous improvement through knowledge-guided analysis in experience feedback. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, v. 24, n. 8, p. 1419-1431.

JORGENSEN, F.; BOER, H.; GERTSEN, F. (2003) Jump-starting continuous improvement through self-assessment. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 23, n. 10, p. 1260–1278.

JUNG, J. Y.; WANG, Y. J. (2006) Relationship between total quality management (TQM) and continuous improvement of international project management (CIIPM). Technovation, v. 26, n. 5-6, p.716-722.

KERRIN, M.; OLIVER, N. (2002) Collective and individual improvement activities: the role of reward systems. Personnel review, v. 31, n. 3, p. 320–337.

LAWLER III, E. E. (1991) High involvement management. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

MARIN GARCIA, J. A.; PARDO DEL VAL, M. BONAVIA MARTIN, T. (2008) La mejora continua como innovación incremental. El caso de una empresa industrial española. Economía Industrial, n. 368, p. 155-167.

MEEGAN, S. T.; TAYLOR, W. A. (1997) Factors influencing a successful transition from ISO 9000 to TQM: the influence of understanding and motivation. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, v. 14, n. 2, p. 100-117.

MESQUITA, M.; ALLIPRANDINI, D. H. (2003) Competências essenciais para melhoria contínua da produção: estudo de caso em empresas da indústria de autopeças. Gestão & Produção, v. 10, n. 1, p. 17-33.

MURRAY, P.; CHAPMAN, R. (2003) From continuous improvement to organizational learning. The Learning Organization, v. 10, n. 5, p. 272-282.

PIL, F.; MACDUFFIE, J. (1996) The adoption of high-involvement work practices. Industrial Relations, V. 35, N. 3, P. 423–455.

RAPP, C.; EKLUND, J. (2002) Sustainable development of improvement activities: the long-term operation of a suggestion scheme in a Swedish company. Total Quality Management, v. 13, n. 7, p. 945–969.

SAVOLAINEN, T.; HAIKONEN, A. (2007) Dynamics of organizational learning and continuous improvement in six sigma implementation. The TQM Magazine, v. 19, n. 1, p. 6–17.

SCHURING, R.; LUIJTEN, H. (2001) Reinventing suggestion systems for continuous improvement. International Journal of Technology Management, v. 22, n. 4, p. 359–372.

SCOTT, S. C.; WILCOCK, E. A.; KANETKAR, V. (2009) A survey of structured continuous improvement programs in the Canadian food sector. Food Control, v. 20, n. 3, p. 209-217.

SHIBA, S.; GRAHAM, A.; WALDEN, D. (1995) TQM desarrollos avanzados. Madrid: Productivity Press.

SILLINCE, J.; SYKES, G.; SINGH, D. (1996) Implementation, problems, success and longevity of quality circle programs: a study of 95 UK organizations. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, v. 16, n. 4, p. 88–111.

SPEAR, S.; BOWEN, H. K. (1999) Decoding the DNA of the Toyota Production System. Harvard Business Review, V. 77, N. 5, P. 96-106.

SPEAR, S. J. (2004) Learning to lead at Toyota. Harvard Business Review, v. 82, n. 5, p. 78-91.

SUAREZ-BARRAZA, F. M.; MIGUEL-DAVILA, J. A. (2008) Encontrando al "Kaizen": un análisis teórico de la "mejora continua". Pecunia, n. 7, p. 285-311.

TERZIOVSKI, M.; FITZPATRICK, P.; O’NEILL, P. (2003) Successful predictors of business process reengineering (BPR) in financial services. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 84, n. 1, p. 35–51.

TERZIOVSKI, M.; SOHAL, A. S. (2000) The adoption of continuous improvement and innovation strategies in Australian manufacturing firms. Technovation, v. 20, n. 10, p. 539–550.

WOOD, A. (2003) Managing employees’ ideas: from where do ideas come?. Journal for Quality & Participation, v. 26, n. 2, p. 22.

WRUCK, K.; JENSEN, M. (1998) The two key principles behind effective TQM program. European Financial Management, v. 4, n. 3, p. 401–423.

WU, C.; CHEN, C. (2006) An integrated structural model toward successful continuous improvement activity. Technovation, v. 26, n. 5-6, p. 697–707.

Published

2013-09-01