Responsiveness and value chain in sugar-ethanol production
Main Article Content
Abstract
Brazil is the world’s major sugarcane producer. In 2018/19, the country will have produced about 47.34 million tons of sugar and 58.8 billion liters of ethanol. Sugar and ethanol are produced in the same production process and the definition of both quantities is pre-established to sugarcane agro-industry. The purpose of this paper is to identify how managers define the production mix of sugar-ethanol in an agro-industry and how this decision adds value to its operations. The results showed that the searched mill adds value to its production through responsiveness and flexibility while orienting the production to sugar and/or ethanol according to the most profitable market during the moment of the decision making.
Downloads
Article Details
1. Proposal of Policy for Free Access Periodics
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in an institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
Proposal of Policy for Periodic that offer Postponed Free Access
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 [SPECIFY TIME HERE] after the publication, allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
d. They allow some kind of open dissemination. Authors can disseminate their articles in open access, but with specific conditions imposed by the editor that are related to:
Version of the article that can be deposited in the repository:
Pre-print: before being reviewed by pairs.
Post-print: once reviewed by pairs, which can be:
The version of the author that has been accepted for publication.
The editor's version, that is, the article published in the magazine.
At which point the article can be made accessible in an open manner: before it is published in the magazine, immediately afterwards or if a period of seizure is required, which can range from six months to several years.
Where to leave open: on the author's personal web page, only departmental websites, the repository of the institution, the file of the research funding agency, among others.
References
AMARA, N.; HALILEM, N.; TRAORÉ, N. (2016) Adding value to companies’ value chain: Role of business schools scholars. Journal of Business Research, v. 69, n. 5, p. 661–1668.
ASSOCIATION OF BIOENERGY PRODUCERS OF MATO GROSSO DO SUL (2014) Available: http://www.biosulms.com.br/resultados. Access: 30th September, 2016.
BEZUIDENHOUT, C. N.; BAIER, T. J. A. (2009) A Global review and synthesis of literature pertaining to integrated sugarcane production systems. Proceedings of the South African Sugar Technologists’ Association, n. 82, p. 93–101.
BEZUIDENHOUT, C. N. (2010) A Global review and synthesis of literature pertaining to integrated sugarcane production systems. Proceedings of the South African Sugar Technologists’ Association, n. 83, p. 63–66.
BRAZILIAN SUGARCANE INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION (2015) Sugarcane industry in Brazil. São Paulo: Brazilian Sugarcane Industry Association.
CENTER OF ADVANCE OF STUDIES IN APPLIED ECONOMICS (2015a). Available: http://cepea.esalq.usp.br/acucar/?page=429. Access: 30th September, 2016.
CENTER OF ADVANCE OF STUDIES IN APPLIED ECONOMICS (2015b) Available: http://cepea.esalq.usp.br/english/ethanol/?id_page=243. Access: September 30, 2016.
CERVO, A. L.; BERVIAN, P. A.; SILVA, R. (2006) Metodologia científica. São Paulo: Pearson Prentice Hall.
CHRISTOPHER, M.(2000) The agile supply chain: Competing in volatile markets. Industrial Marketing Management, v. 29, n. 1, p. 37–44.
COMPANHIA NACIONAL DE ABASTECIMENTO (2013) Perspectivas para a agropecuária. v. 1, Safra: 2013/2014. Brasilia: Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento.
CZINAR, M. M. (2013) Setor sucroalcooleiro. Sinais distorcidos. Agroanalysis, v. 33, n. 10, p. 26.
FEDERATION OF INDUSTRIES OF THE STATE OF SÃO PAULO (2015) Outlook Fiesp 2023: projeções para o agronegócio brasileiro. Available: http://apps2.fiesp.com.br/outlookDeagro/pt-BR. Access: 12th February, 2017.
GILLHAM, B. (2000) Case study research methods. London: British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data.
GODOI, C. K.; MELO, R. B.; SILVA, A. B. (2010) Pesquisa qualitativa em estudos organizacionais: Paradigmas, estratégias e métodos. São Paulo: Saraiva.
GOLDEMBERG, J.; COELHO, S. T.; GUARDABASSI, P. (2008) The sustainability of ethanol production from sugarcane. Energy Policy, v. 36, n. 6, p. 2086–2097.
HALEY, S. (2015) Projecting World Raw Sugar Prices. Washington D.C.: EMS/USDA.
HIGGINS, A.; THORBURN, P.; ARCHER, A.; JAKKU, E. (2007) Opportunities for value chain research in sugar industries. Agricultural Systems, v. 94, n. 3, p. 611–621.
HOLWEG. M. (2005) The three dimensions of responsiveness. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 25, n. 7, p. 603–622.
JIMENEZ, C. H. O.; MACHUCA, J. A. D.; GARRIDO-VEGA, P.; FILIPPINI, R. (2015) The pursuit of responsiveness in production environments: From flexibility to reconfigurability. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 163, p. 157–172.
KAPLINSKY, R.; MORRIS, M. (2001) A handbook for value chain research. Available: http://www.srp-guinee.org/download/valuechain-handbook.pdf. Access 12th February, 2017.
KRISTIANTO, Y.; GUNASEKARAN, A., HELO, P. (2017). Building the “Triple R” in global manufacturing. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 183, Part C, p. 607-619.
MARCONI, M. A.; LAKATOS, E. M. (2010) Fundamentos de metodologia científica. São Paulo: Atlas.
MILANEZ, A. Y.; NYKO, D.; GARCIA, J. L. F.; REIS, B. L. S. F. S. (2012) O déficit de produção de etanol no Brasil entre 2012 e 2015: Determinantes, consequências e sugestões de política. BNDES Setorial, n. 35, p. 277–302.
MILANEZ, A. Y.; NYKO, D.; VALENTE, M. S.; XAVIER, C. E. O.; DONKE, C. G.; GOUVÊIA, V. L. R. (2014) A produção de etanol pela integração do milho-safrinha às usinas de cana-de-açúcar: Avaliação ambiental, econômica e sugestões de política. BNDES Setorial, n. 41, p. 147–208.
MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, LIVESTOCK AND SUPPLY (2015) Relação de instituições no departamento de cana-de-açúcar e agroenergia. Brasilia: Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Supply.
MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, LIVESTOCK AND SUPPLY (2016) Cana-de-açúcar. Available: http://www.agricultura.gov.br/vegetal/culturas/cana-de-acucar. Access: 21th November, 2016.
MOTA, J. C. V.; MACHADO, A. G. C.; MORAES, W. F. A. (2014) Condicionantes para exportação no setor sucroenergético brasileiro. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural, v. 52, n. 4, p. 705–724.
NEALE, P.; THAPA, S.; BOYCE, C. (2006) Preparing a case study: A guide for designing and conducting a case study for evaluation input. Watertown, MA: Pathfinder International Tool Series.
NOLLET, J.; PONCE, S.; CAMPBELL, M. (2005) About “strategy” and “strategies” in supply management. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, v. 11, n. 2–3, p. 129–140.
NOGUEIRA, A. H. L.; CAPAZ, R. S. (2013) Biofuels in Brazil: Evolution, achievements and perspectives on food security. Global Food Security, v. 2, n. 2, p. 117–125.
NYKO, D.; FARIA, J. L. G.; MILANEZ, A. Y.; CASTRO, N. J.; BRANDÃO, R.; DANTAS, G. A. (2011) Determinantes do baixo aproveitamento do potencial elétrico do setor sucroenergético: Uma pesquisa de campo. BNDES Setorial, n. 33, p. 421–476.
PEHRSSON, A. (2011) Firms’ customer responsiveness: relationships with competition, market growth, and performance. Journal of Strategy and Management, v. 4, n. 4, p. 347–364.
PORTER, M. E. (1998) Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance: with a new introduction. New York: Free Press.
PRATT, M. G. (2009) From the editors: For the lack of a boilerplate: Tips on writing up (and reviewing) qualitative research. Academy of Management Journal, v. 52, n. 5, p. 856–862.
REIS, J. G. M.; COSTA NETO, P. L. O.; NAAS, I. A.; FORMIGONI, A.; RODRIGUES, E. F. (2011) Responsive Supply Chain: the productive sugar-alcohol network and its responsive configuration in the production of sugar and ethanol. In: ADVANCES IN PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, Stavanger. Proceedings… Stavanger: IFIP, 2011.
REIS, J. G. M.; TSUJI, E. R.; MACHADO, S. T.; SANTOS, R. C.; DELIBERADOR, L. R.; OLIVEIRA, R. V.; URIO, L. C. S.; COSTA NETO, P. L. O. (2013) The impact of storage strategy in the competitiveness of the Brazilian soybean-complex. In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 22, 2013, Foz do Iguaçu. Proceedings… Foz do Iguaçu: IFIP, 2013.
ROH, J.; HONG, P.; MIN, H. (2014) Implementation of a responsive supply chain strategy in global complexity: The case of manufacturing firms. International Journal of Production Economics, n. 147, Part B, p. 198–210.
SAHA, A. (2011) Mapping of Porter’s value chain activities into business functional units. Available in: http://www.managementexchange.com/hack/mapping-porter’s-value-chain-activities-business-functional-units. Access: 12th February, 2017.
SHIKIDA, P. F. A.; AZEVEDO, P. F.; VIAN, C. E. F. (2011) Desafios da agroindústria canavieira no Brasil pós-desregulamentação: Uma análise das capacidades tecnológicas. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural, v. 49, n. 3, p. 599–628.
SIGGELKOW, N. (2007) Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management Journal, v. 50, n. 1, p. 20–24.
SOUSA, E. L. L.; MACEDO, I. C. (2010) Etanol e bioeletricidade: A cana-de-açúcar no futuro da matriz energética. São Paulo: Luc Projetos de Comunicação.
TONIN, J. R.; GODOY, A. A. J. (2013) Price Asymmetry and Basis Risk of the BM&F Bovespa Hydrous Ethanol Future Contract: Dynamics of Biofuels Markets in Brazilian South-Center. Proceedings of the Conference on Transnational Corporations and Development in Brazil, v. 1, n. 1, p. 190–204.
UNION OF BIOENERGY PRODUCERS (2015) Available: http://www.udop.com.br/index.php. Access: 15th December, 2016.
VALENTE, M. S.; NYKO, D.; REIS, B. L. S. F. S.; MILANEZ, A. Y. (2012) Bens de capital para o setor sucroenergético: A indústria está preparada para atender adequadamente o novo ciclo de investimentos em usinas de cana-de-açúcar. BNDES Setorial, n. 36, p. 119–178.
XAVIER, C. V.; PITTA, F.; MENDONÇA, M. L. (2011) A monopoly in Ethanol Production in Brazil: The Cosan-Shell merger. Amsterdam: Milieudefensie.
YIN, R. K. (2010) Estudo de caso: Planejamento e métodos. Porto Alegre: Bookman.
YU, K.; CADEAUX, J.; LUO, B. N. (2015) Operational flexibility: Review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, n. 169, p. 190–202.