Interpretive structural modeling of knowledge network in car industry’ R&D centers
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
صندلی اداریAbstract
The current research has been done with the aim of knowledge network interpretive structural modeling in car industry’s R&D centers. The key factors for implementing a knowledge network in car industry’s R&D centers have been determined and then the final graphical model has been drawn by Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) approach.
The method of the current applied research includes a survey of experts and then the variables extracted through investigating research background, after that the MATLAB R2013 software is used for making compatible matrix as well as drawing graphical relations of the model by Interpretive Structural Modeling approach.
After studying related works & interviewing with under-studied firms’ managers, interpretive structural modeling (ISM) & MICMAC analysis was used to generate a model for knowledge network.
Previous studies had not investigated the knowledge network in car industry’s R&D centers; however, the present study implemented the knowledge network model in R&D Centers.Downloads
Article Details
1. Proposal of Policy for Free Access Periodics
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in an institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
Proposal of Policy for Periodic that offer Postponed Free Access
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 [SPECIFY TIME HERE] after the publication, allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
d. They allow some kind of open dissemination. Authors can disseminate their articles in open access, but with specific conditions imposed by the editor that are related to:
Version of the article that can be deposited in the repository:
Pre-print: before being reviewed by pairs.
Post-print: once reviewed by pairs, which can be:
The version of the author that has been accepted for publication.
The editor's version, that is, the article published in the magazine.
At which point the article can be made accessible in an open manner: before it is published in the magazine, immediately afterwards or if a period of seizure is required, which can range from six months to several years.
Where to leave open: on the author's personal web page, only departmental websites, the repository of the institution, the file of the research funding agency, among others.
References
ALIPOUR, Z. (2014) Presenting the model of effective factors on knowledge sharing in Islamic Azad University ̓ Educational groups (A survey about Tehran-North & science & research branch). Information Technology Management, v. 10, n. 4, p. 91-116.
ALVANI, S.; ZAREEMATIN, H.; PASHAZADEH, Y. (2009) Identifying & designing knowledge sharing & generating at the university. Journal of management in Islamic University, v. 13, n. 4.
ANDREA, B.; VON KROGH, G.; SEUFERT, A. (2005) Putting Knowledge Networks into Action, Methodology, Development, Maintenance. Berlin: Springer.
ASKARANY, D.; SMITH, M.; YAZDIFAR, H. (2007) Attributes of innovation and the implementation of managerial tools: an activity-based management technique. Int. J. Business and Systems Research, v. 1, n. 1, p. 98-114.
CHINSOMBOON, M. O. (2000) Incubators in the new economy. Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
EARL, M. (2001) Knowledge Management Strategies: Toward a taxonomy. Journal of Management information Systems, n. 18, p. 215-233.
EASTON, G. (1992) Industrial networks: A review. In: AXELSSON, B.; EASTON, G. Industrial Networks - A New View of Reality. London: Routledge.
FARSHAD, G.; KHODADADHOSEINI, S. (2006) Designing the strategic pattern for entrance to global market: Iran Car Industry. Journal of Modares Olom Ensani, v. 10, n. 1.
FAZOLLAHI, S.; NOUROZI, A. (2011) Infrastructures of knowledge management in Azad Islamic University & Qom State University from the faculty viewpoint. Journal of Educational Sciences, v. 15, n. 4, p. 129-149.
FIGALLO, C.; RHINE, N. (2002) Building the Knowledge Management Network: Best Practices, Tools, and Techniques for Putting Conversation to Work. United States: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
FREEMAN, (1991) A complexity approach to innovation networks-the case of the aircraft industry (1909-1997). Research Policy, n. 29, p. 257-272.
GHANI, S. R. (2009) Knowledge Management: Tools and Techniques. Journal of Library & Information Technology, v. 29, n. 6, p. 33-38.
HARGADON, A. B. (1998) Firms as knowledge brokers: lessons in pursuing continuous innovation. California management review, v. 40, n. 3.
HASAANZADEH, M.; TEYMORITABEE, M. (2015) Knowledge flow & presenting a conceptual model in knowledge-based firms of Tehran University Science & technology Park. Science Ontology Studies, v. 1, n. 1, p. 23-39.
JAYRAMA, A.; AYVARI, A. (2005) Can the knowledge – creation process be managed? a case study of an artist training project. International Journal of Arts Management, v. 72, n. 2, p. 4-14.
JOHNSON, D. J. (2009) Managing Knowledge Networks. London: Cambridge University Press.
KAZEMI, M.; VAHIDIMOTLAGH, T.; VAHIDIMOTLAGH, S. (2015) STUDY OF FACTORS ON KNOWLEDGE SHARING IN Iranian Virtual Societies. Management Research, n. 23, p. 107-128.
KLIMASAUSKIENE, R. (2003) Enhancing science-based innovations through knowledge mobility between higher education and educational practice. European Conference on Educational Research. Hamburg: University of Hamburg.
LIN, W. (2008) The exploration factors of affecting knowledge sharing - The case of Taiwan's high-tech industry. Expert Systems with Applications, v. 35, n. 3, p. 661-676.
MALHOTRA, Y. (2003) Measuring knowledge assets of a nation: knowledge systems for development. United Nations.
MIRKAMALI, S.; HOSEINGHOLINEJAD, R. (2010) Effective main factors on knowledge sharing, case study in psychological & educational Sciences of Ferdosi University. Journal of Iran higher educational association, v. 3, n. 1.
MONGE, P.; FULK, J.; KALMAN, M. E.; FLANAGIN, A. J.; PRNASSA, C. (1998) Production of Collective Action in Alliance-Based. Inter organizational Communication and Information Systems, Organization Science, v. 9, n. 3, p. 411-433.
MOZAFARI, A.; SAADAT, F. (2009) Usage of new communicative tools in the field of tourism advertisements (case study; Kish free-Zone since 2003 to 2008). Quarterly journal of communicative researches, v. 59, n. 3, p. 141-170.
NOOTEBOOM, B. (1999) Innovation and inter-firm linkages: new implications for policy. Research Policy, n. 28, p. 793–805.
PAHLEVANI, M.; PIRAYESH, R.; ALIPOUR, V.; BASHKOH, M. (2010) Investigating & prioritizing effective cultural factors in knowledge sharing in Petrochemical R&D centers. Information Technology Management, v. 5, n. 2, p. 9-36.
PALMIÉ, M. F. (2012) Organizational Architecture and the Realization of Competitive Advantages from Multinationality. Gallen, Germany: D I S S E R T A T I O N of the University of St. Gallen.
PEREZ, J. R.; PABLOS, P. O. (2003) Knowledge management and organizational competitiveness: a framework for human capital analysis. Journal of Knowledge Management, v. 7, n. 3, p. 82-91.
POURSERAJEAN, D.; OLIA, M.; SOLTANI, M. (2013) Determining & prioritizing knowledge sharing obstacles at the universities & higher educational institutions; case study: Imam Jawad (AS) higher educational institution. Quarterly journal of parks and incubator, v. 9, n. 34.
RAVI, V.; SHANKAR, R.; TAIWARI, M. (2005) Productivity improvement of a computer hardware supply chain. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, v. 54, n. 4, p. 239-255.
REZAEEAN, A.; DANAEEFARD, F.; ZANKOEENEJAD, A. (2011) Designing the conceptual pattern for knowledge property- intellectual capital measurement in national level. Perspective of public management, n. 6, p. 25-41.
RUIZ-BENITEZ, R.; CAMBRA-FIERRO, J. (2011) Reverse logistics practices in the Spanish SMEs context. Journal of Operations and Supply Chain Management, p. 37-52.
SEUFERT, A.; KROGH, G.; BACH, A. (1999) Towards knowledge networking. Journal of Knowledge Management, v. 3, n. 3, p. 180-190.
SHAHBANDZADEH, H.; HASSANNIAZI, F. (2014) Presenting a model for identifying the most important effective factors on knowledge sharing in the organizations. New Management Sciences. Tehran.
TAGHIZADEH, H.; ZEAEE, M. (2013) Presenting the model of relationship between knowledge sharing components in educational institutions by interpretive structural Modeling. Bulletin of Administrative Management, v. 10, n. 5.
TAVALLAEE, R.; BAMDAD SOOFI, J.; SADAGHIYAN, J. S.; SALEHIFAR, M. (2012) Developing a Model of Knowledge Networks in Organizations－Case Study: Petroleum Industry of I.R.Iran. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, v. 2, n. 5.
THAKKAR, J.; DESHMUKH, S. G.; GUPTA, A. D.; SHANKAR, R. (2007) Development of a balanced scorecard An integrated approach of Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) and Analytic Network Process. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, v. 56, n. 1, p. 25-59.
WANG, S.; NOE, R. A. (2010) Knowledge sharing: a reviewand direction for future research. Human Resource Manaement Review, v. 20, n. 2, p. 115-131.
YORTCHI, S. (2010) Presenting applied pattern for measuring the value of knowledge sharing capability. Journal of Information science & technology, n. 63, p. 5-28.
ZAHRA, S.; NEUBAUM, D.; LARRAÑETA, B. (2007) Knowledge sharing and technological capabilities: The moderating role of family involvement. Journal of Business Research, v. 60, n. 10, p. 1070-1079.
ZHOU, K. Z.; BROWN, J. R.; DEV, C. S. (2009) Market orientation, competitive advantage, and performance: A demand-based perspective. Journal of Business Research, v. 62, n. 11, p. 1063-1070.