Competitive pressure systems mapping in the brazilian truck market

Main Article Content

Ricardo Costa da Cruz
Francisco C. T. Starke-Rodrigues
صندلی اداری

Abstract

The automotive business in Brazil achieved 10% of the industry revenue and 6% of the formal employment by 2008. The commercial vehicle segment concentrated so far eight truck makers that experienced their best market figures in 2008, the economy crisis in 2009, and an extraordinary recovery in 2010. Government tax reduction programs as well as special financing incentives were undoubtedly decisive to re-stimulate the business during the crisis. Positive Brazilian perspectives with the boom in the agricultural, oil and gas, mining and infrastructure activities plus the coming sports events call the attention of new players that are quickly implementing different business strategies to become part of the game. New emission regulations starting from 2012 also bring uncertainties, challenges and opportunities. With the growing globalization and market concentration it's critical for any industry understand and minimize the forces of competitive pressures. The main goal of this paper, therefore, is to contribute to the academy with an alternative approach of strategic and behavioral analysis of rivalry and competition different than the five forces model of Porter. Ford, Iveco, MAN, Mercedes-Benz, Scania and Volvo were assessed from 2008 to 2010 within three main performance indicators – unit sales, gross revenues and operating profits – supporting the elaboration of the competitive pressure systems mapping model of D'aveni, including a hypothetical future scenario with a new entrant and the potential impacts in the system. Main findings and results portray the asymmetrical strategic behavior of competitors and the temporary dynamic stability in the Brazilian truck industry.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

ABDI, Agência Brasileira de Desenvolvimento Industrial. (2008) Determinantes da Acumulação de Conhecimento para Inovação Tecnológica nos Setores Industriais no Brasil – Setor Automotivo. Retrieved from: http://www.abdi.com.br/Estudo/Relatório%20Automotivo.pdf.

ANFAVEA, Associação Nacional dos Fabricantes de Veículos Automotores. (2011) Carta da Anfavea. Available from: http://www.anfavea.com.br/carta.html.

HUNOFF, R.; ROMERO, V. (2011) Cabe mais um? Agência de Notícias Autodata. Retrieved from: http://www.autodata.com.br/modules/revista.php?m=reportagens&recid=6716.

BESANKO, D.; DRANOVE, D.; SCHAEFER, S.; SHANLEY, M. (2006) Economia da Estratégia. 3ª ed. Bookman, São Paulo.

BINGHAM, C. B.; EISENHARDT, K. M.; FURR, N. R. (2011). Which Strategy When? MIT Sloan Management Review, v. 53, n. 1, p. 71-77. Retrieved from: http://search.proquest.com/docview/896571132.

D’AVENI, R. A. (2002). Competitive Pressure Systems: Mapping and Managing Multimarket Contact. MIT Sloan Management Review, v. 44, n. 1, p. 39-49. Retrieved from: http://search.proquest.com/docview/224960273.

FENABRAVE, Federação Nacional da Distribuição de Veículos Automotores. Informativo Fenabrave – Emplacamentos. Retrieved from: http://www.fenabrave.com.br.

KARAKAYA, F.; YANNOPOULOS, P. (2010). Defensive strategy framework in global markets: A mental models approach. European Journal of Marketing, v. 44, n. 7/8, p. 1077-1100. doi: 10.1108/03090561011047535.

KEEGAN, W. J. (2005) Marketing Global. 7. Ed. São Paulo: Editora Prentice Hall.

KIM W. C.; MAUBORGNE, R. (2005) A estratégia do oceano azul: como criar novos mercados e tornar a concorrência irrelevante. 16. Ed. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Elsevier.

HSU, M. Y.; CHEN, M. J. (2006) Competitor Analysis and Inter-Firm Rivalry: by integrating market commonality and resource similarity. Darden Graduate School of Business, University of Virginia.

O CARRETEIRO, G. G. Editora de Publicações Técnicas Ltda. (2011). Tabelas – Novos e Usados. Available from: http://www.revistaocarreteiro.com.br.

PEREIRA, P. L. S.; CARVALHO, M. M.; LAURINDO, F. J. B. (2004) Competitive Mapping In a Brazilian Food Industry. EUROMA2004 - European Operations Management Association, Fontainebleau. Proceedings, v. 2, p. 247-256.

PORTER, M. E. (2004) Estratégia competitiva: técnicas para a análise de indústrias e da concorrência. 2. Ed. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Elsevier.

SCARANELLO, B. M.; CARVALHO, M. M. (2005). Análise das pressões competitivas em um segmento do setor de bebidas alcoólicas. SIMPEP – Simpósio de Engenharia de Produção, Anais XII (2005). Available from: http://www.simpep.feb.unesp.br/anais.php.

SEGISMUNDO, A.; LAURINDO, F. J. B. (2006). Aplicação de mapeamento das pressões competitivas: um estudo do segmento de caminhões semipesados no mercado brasileiro. SIMPEP – Simpósio de Engenharia de Produção, Anais XIII (2006). Available from: http://www.simpep.feb.unesp.br/anais.php.

STAMBAUGH, J.; YU, A.; DUBINSKY, A. (2011). Before the Attack: A Typology of Strategies for Competitive Aggressiveness. Journal of Management Policy and Practice, v. 12, n. 1, p. 49-63. Retrieved from: http://search.proquest.com/docview/876865222.

STOREY, J. (2010) The World’s Truck Manufacturers 13th Edition – an operating and financial review. Automotive World Ltd.

WIKINVEST, Investing Website. Key Metrics for Ford Motor Company. Retrieved from: http://www.wikinvest.com/stock/Ford_Motor_Company_(F)/Data/Key_Metrics.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

فروشگاه اینترنتی