The Impact of Product Quality, Service Quality, and Customer Loyalty Program perception on Retail Customer Attitude
Main Article Content
Abstract
This journal examines the relationship between perception of product quality, perception of service quality, perception of Customer Loyalty Program on retail customer behavior, and sales volumes of cement products. This study examines three different cement brands, namely cement XYZ with the largest market share, cement PQR which is the main competitor, as well as cement ABC, a newcomer cement brand which is strong enough to enter the Indonesian cement market. The research is focused on the building material retailers with 100 respondents. The data collection will be done by survey through direct interview by using questionnaires. The analysis of this research uses descriptive analysis, analysis by ANOVA and also inferential analysis by using Structural Equation Model (SEM). The results of this study indicate that from the factors that influence the attitudes of retail customers of the three variables tested, only one dominant factor which influences the attitude of retail customers, which is the perception of the product quality. The results of this research also show that the perception of product quality also affects sale volume significantly, the greater the perception of the quality of cement products, the greater the volume of sales generated by the retail customer.
Downloads
Article Details
1. Proposal of Policy for Free Access Periodics
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in an institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
Proposal of Policy for Periodic that offer Postponed Free Access
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 [SPECIFY TIME HERE] after the publication, allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
d. They allow some kind of open dissemination. Authors can disseminate their articles in open access, but with specific conditions imposed by the editor that are related to:
Version of the article that can be deposited in the repository:
Pre-print: before being reviewed by pairs.
Post-print: once reviewed by pairs, which can be:
The version of the author that has been accepted for publication.
The editor's version, that is, the article published in the magazine.
At which point the article can be made accessible in an open manner: before it is published in the magazine, immediately afterwards or if a period of seizure is required, which can range from six months to several years.
Where to leave open: on the author's personal web page, only departmental websites, the repository of the institution, the file of the research funding agency, among others.
References
AL-NASER M.; YUSOFF R. Z.; ISLAM R. (2016) Mediating effect of e-service quality perception on attitude and trust toward online shoping. International business management, v. 10, n. 3, p. 228-240.
ANDREANI F. (2007) Customer Loyalty Program dan aplikasinya dalam industri manufaktur dan jasa. Journal manajemen pemasaran, v. 2, n. 2, p. 59-65.
ARBORE, A.; ESTES, Z. (2013) Loyalty program structure and consumers' feeling special in grocery store. Jurnal of retailing and consumer services, v. 20, p. 439-444.
ASSHIDIN, H. N.; ABIDIN, N.; BORHAN, H. B. (2016) Consumer Attitude and Uniqueness towards International Products. Procedia economics and finance, v. 35, p. 632-638.
AYNADIS, Z. (2014) Factors Affecting Customers’ Attitude among Foreign and Domestic Footwear Products. International journal of academic scientific research, v. 2, n. 3, p. 13-20.
BERRY, R. (1995) Define quality service so you can deliver it. Best's review, v. 95, n. 11, p. 68.
BOECK. H.; ROY, J.; DURIF, F.; GREGOIRE, M. (2011) The effect of perceived intrusion on cosumers' attitude towards using an RFID-based marketing program. Procedia Computer Science, v. 5, p. 841-848.
BOISVERT, J. A.; NICK, J. (2011) How brand innovativeness and quality impact attitude toward new service line extension the moderating role of consumer involvement. Journal of Service Marketing, v. 25, n. 7, p. 517-527.
BRIDSON, K.; EVANS, J.; HICKMAN, M. (2008) Assessing the relationship between loyalty program attributes, store satisfaction and store loyalty. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, v. 15, n. 5, p. 364-374.
CHAUDHURI, A. (1996) The relationship of attitudes, habit and loyalty to market share in relation to a staple good in a local grocery store: An exploratory study. Journal of Bussiness and Psychology, v. 11, n. 2, p. 2265-274.
CHEN, H.; CHENG, H. (2011) E-service quality and risk perception on Customer satisfaction and e-brand identity by gender difference. International Journal on Gstf Business Review, v. 1, n. 2, p. 234-238.
CHRISTIANSEN, A. A. (2010) The influence of product publicity on attitude fromation for fashion products. [Master theses]. Aarhus school of business. Aarhus university.
DAVID, A. G. (1998) art 4 Competing on the Eight Dimensions of Quality. Managing quality, New York : free press.
DUNKOVIC, D.; PETKOVIC, G. (2015) Loyalty programs in grocery retailing: do Customer provoke a tiered rewarding system?. Poslovna izvrsnost zagreb.
DURIANTO, S.; SITINJAK, T. (2001) Strategi Menaklukkan Pasar Melalui. Riset Ekuitas dan Perilaku Merek, PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
EDY, Y.; ASTUTI, S.; ENDANG, I.; UTAMI, N. H. (2014) The effect of online service quality toward perceived risk, Customer attitudes. Relationship quality, onlice purchase intention, e-loyalty, and purchasing behaviour. Eropean Journal of Business and Management, v. 6, n. 22, p. 89-97.
GONZALES, C. (2008) Antecedents and consequences of attitude toward sales. Recherce et application en marketing, v. 23, n. 4.
HA, S. (2007) How Customer Loyalty Programs can influence relational marketing outcomes using Customer ritel identification to build relationship. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Colombus : The Ohio State University.
HORVAT, S.; DOSEN, D. O. (2013) Perceived risk influence on the consumer attitude to private labels in the product's life cycle growth stage. Economic and Business Review, v. 15, n. 4, p. 267-91.
HUANG, J.; LEE, B. C. Y.; HO, S. H. (2004) Consumer attitude toward gray market goods. International Marketing Review, v. 21, n. 6, p. 598-614.
JAAFAR, S. N.; LALP, P. E.; NABA, M. M. (2013) Consumers’ Perceptions, Attitudes and Purchase Intention towards Private Label Food Products in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Business and Management Sciences, v. 2, n. 8, p. 73-90.
KESHVARI, R. S. (2012) The Impact of E-CLP on Customers Attitude and Its Association with Generating Competitive Advantages in Iranian financial B2B Context. International Bussiness Research, v. 5, n. 4, p. 34-55.
KHAN, S. (2012) Factor responsible for making consumer attitude towards islamic banking. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, v. 2, n. 1, p. 136-148.
KHARE, A. (2011) Customers’ perception and attitude towards service quality in multinational banks in India. International Journal Service and Operation Management, v. 10, n. 2, p. 199-216.
KHURANA, A.; CHAUDHARY, V. (2010) Customers’ Attitude Towards Mobile Messaging Technology in Promoting CLP: A Study. The Iup Journal of Management Research, v. 9, n. 6, p. 20-28.
KUMAR, R. A. (2011) Customer Loyalty Program: concepts and cases. New delhi: Prentice hall of india private limited.
KUMARI, A. (2013) Customer perception and attitude towards matrimonial sites in chennai, tamilnadu. International journal of applied service marketing perspectives, v. 2, n. 2, p. 330-343.
MAGATEF, S. G.; TOMALIEH, E. F. (2015) The impact of Customer Loyalty Programs on Customer retention. International Journal of Business and Social Science, v. 6, n. 8, p. 78-93.
MCCALL, M.; VOORHEES, C. (2010) The drivers of loyalty program success : an organizing framework and research agenda. Cornell Hospitality Quaterly, v. 51, n. 1, p. 35-52.
MENNECKE, B.; TOWNSEND, A.; HAYES, D. J.; LONERGAN, S. (2006) A Study of the Factors that Influence Consumer Attitudes Toward Beef Products Using the Conjoint Market Analysis Tool. CARD Working paper 06-WP 425, Centre for agricultural and rural development. Iowa : Iowa state university.
MICHAEL, A.; FRANK, H. 2004. Corporate Claims as Innovator or Market Leader: Impact on Overall attitude and quality perceptions and transfer to company brands. Corporate Reputation Review, v. 7, n. 2, p. 147-160.
MPINGAJINRA, M. (2015) An Investigation Of Perceived Service Quality In Online Shopping: A Hierarchical Approach. The Journal of Applied Business Research, v. 31, n. 1, p. 115-132.
MUKERJEE, K. (2013) Strategizing CLP to leverage its benefits. Business Strategy Series, v. 14, n. 4, p. 118-122.
OLIVER, R. (1999) Whence consumer loyalty. Journal of Marketing, v. 63, p. 33-44.
PARASURAMAN, A.; VALARIE, A.; ZEITHAML, L.; BERRY, L. (1985) A Conceptual model of service quality and its implication for future research. Jurnal of Marketing, v. 49, p. 41-50.
PUJIONO, R.; SUMARWAN, U.; HARTOYO. (2016) The analysis of retail store's attitude towards product attributes of XYZ brand of paint and its competitors. Journal of marketing and consumer research, v. 19, p. 31-44.
RADOMIR, L. (2012) A Review of the Service Quality Concept-Past, Present and Perspectives. International conference marketing-from information to decision.
RAI, A. K. (2013) Customer Loyalty Program: Concepts and Cases (2nd Edition). New Delhi : PHI Learning Private Limited.
RAMDHANI, A.; ALAMANDA, D. T.; SUDRAJAT, H. (2012) Analysis of consumer attitude using fishbein multi-attributes approach. International Journal of Basic and Applied Science, v. 1, n. 1.
RINK, L. (1998) The attitude-behaviour relationship and usage effect in the white wine market. International Journal of Wine Marketing, v. 10, n. 2, p. 34-60.
SANGLE, P. S.; AWASTHI, P. (2011) Consumer’s expectations from mobile CLP services:a banking context. Business Process Management Journal, v. 17, n. 6, p. 898-918.
SANTOSO, J. F.; KUNTO, Y. S. (2014) Pengaruh perceived quality terhadap attitude toward brand pada pengguna smartphone samsung di surabaya. Jurnal Manajemen Pemasaran Petra, v. 2, n. 1, p. 1-7.
SARMANIOTIS, C.; ASSIMAKOPOULOS, P. E. (2013) successful implementation of CLP in luxury hotels: determinants and measurements. Euromed Journal of Business, v. 8, n. 2, p. 134-153.
SEKARAN, U. (2003) Research methods for business. United states of America: southern illnois university at Carbondale.
SHETH, J. N.; ATUL, P.; SHAINESH, G. (2008) Customer Loyalty Program: emerging concepts, tools and applications. New delhi: Tata Mcgraw-hill publishing company.
SILCOFF, S.; MCNISH, J.; LADURANTAYE, S. (2013) Inside the fall of blackberry how the smartphone inventor failed to adapt. Http://www.theglobeandmail.comreport-on-businessthe-inside-story-of-why-blackberry-is-failingarticle14563602page=all. Diakses pada 7 februari 2016.
BILSON, S. (2003) Memenangkan pasar dengan pemasaran efektif dan profitabel. Jakarta : PT. Gramedia pustaka utama.
SINGH, T. (2014) A quasi-experimental study to assess the impact of cause-related marketing on brand attitude and purchase intention. International Journal of Retailing and Rural Business Perspctives, v. 3, n. 3, p. 116-1124.
SIRFAZ, M.; SABIR, H. M.; NAZ, H. N. (2014) How attitude influences the Customers’ buying. International Journal of Management & Organizational Studies, v. 3, n. 2, p. 11-17.
THAKUR, R. (2005) Customer Satisfaction, Behavior Intention, Attitude, And Knowledge: Focus On The Antecedents Of Relationship Share In The Context Of Customer Loyalty Program. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Illinois : Southern Illinois university carbondale.
VINAYAGAMOORTHY, A.; MAGDALINE, M. S. (2015) A Study on Customers‟ Attitude towards Service Quality of Private Sector Banks in Krishnagiri District. International Journal of Emerging Research in Management &Technology, v. 4, n. 10.
WIJAYA, D.; SAN, C. T. (2015) Indonesia Industry Focus-Indonesia Property Sector. DBS Group Research. Jakarta: DBS Vickers Securities.
WU, S.; LO L. C. (2008) The influence of core-brand attitude and consumer perception on purchase intention towards extended product. Asia pacific journal of marketing and logistic, v. 21, n. 1, p. 174-194.