Toyota production system - one example to shipbuilding industry
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The shipbuilding system can use the techniques used in the Toyota Production System as an example for its production process. Production should be lean, minimize defects, stop production and reduce or eliminate inventories. Lean production is regarded by many as simply an enhancement of mass production methods, whereas agility implies breaking out of the mass production mould and producing much more highly customized products - where the customer wants them in any quantity. In a product line context, it amounts to striving for economies of scope, rather than economies of scale ideally serving ever smaller niche markets, even quantities of one, without the high cost traditionally associated with customization. A lean company may be thought of as a very productive and cost efficient producer of goods or services.
Downloads
Article Details
1. Proposal of Policy for Free Access Periodics
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in an institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
Proposal of Policy for Periodic that offer Postponed Free Access
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 [SPECIFY TIME HERE] after the publication, allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
d. They allow some kind of open dissemination. Authors can disseminate their articles in open access, but with specific conditions imposed by the editor that are related to:
Version of the article that can be deposited in the repository:
Pre-print: before being reviewed by pairs.
Post-print: once reviewed by pairs, which can be:
The version of the author that has been accepted for publication.
The editor's version, that is, the article published in the magazine.
At which point the article can be made accessible in an open manner: before it is published in the magazine, immediately afterwards or if a period of seizure is required, which can range from six months to several years.
Where to leave open: on the author's personal web page, only departmental websites, the repository of the institution, the file of the research funding agency, among others.
References
ALI, R.; DEIF, A. (2016) Assessing leanness level with demand dynamics in a multi-stage production system. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, v. 27, n. 5, p. 614-639.
BALL, P. (2015) Low energy production impact on lean flow. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, v. 26, n. 3, p. 412-428.
BENNET, D.; KLUG, F. (2012) Logistics supplier integration in the automotive industry. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 32, n. 11, p. 1281-1305.
BIRKIE, S. E. (2016) Operational resilience and lean: in search of synergies and trade-offs. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, v. 27, n. 2, p. 185-207.
BONNEY, M.; JABER, M. (2013) Developing an input–output activity matrix (IOAM) for environmental and economic analysis of manufacturing systems and logistics chains. International Journal of Production Economics, n. 143, p. 589-597.
BROWN, K. A.; SCHMITT, T. G.; SCHONBERGER, R. J. (2015) ASP, the Art and science of practice: three challenges for a lean enterprise in turbulent times. Interfaces, v. 45, n. 3, May-June, p. 260-270.
BR KUMAR, R.; SHARMA, M. K.; AGARWAL, A. (2015) An experimental investigation of lean management in aviation Avoiding unforced errors for better supply chain. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, v. 26, n. 2, p. 231-260.
BRUNCH, J.; BELLGRAN, M. (2014) Integrated portfolio planning of products and production systems. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, v. 25, n. 2, p. 155-174.
CHAVEZ, R.; GIMENEZ, C.; FYNES, B.; WIENGARTEN, F.; YU, W. (2013) Internal lean practices and operational performance. The contingency perspective of industry clockspeed. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 33, n. 5, p. 562-588.
CHAY, T.; XU, Y.; TIWARI, A.; CHAY, F. (2015) Towards lean transformation: the analysis of lean implementation frameworks. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, v. 26, n. 7, p. 1031-1052.
CHEN, Y-S.; SU, H-CH.; RO, Y. K. (2017) The co-evolution of supplier relationship quality and product quality in the U.S. auto industry: A cultural perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, n. 184, p. 245-255.
DEKKERS, R.; KÜHNLE, H. (2012) Appraising interdisciplinary contributions to theory for collaborative (manufacturing) networks. Still a long way to go? Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, v. 23, n. 8, p. 1090-1128
DIBIA, I. K.; DHAKAL, H. N.; ONUH, S. (2014) Lean “Leadership People Process Outcome” (LPPO) implementation model. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, v. 25, n. 5, p. 694-711.
DRAKE, P. R.; LEE, D. M.; HUSSAIN, M. (2013) The lean and agile purchasing portfolio model. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, v. 18, n. 1, p. 3-20.
EL-KHALIL, R. (2015) Simulation analysis for managing and improving productivity - A case study of an automotive company. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, v. 26, n. 1, p. 36-56.
FENG, C.; XIAO, Y.; WILLETTE, A.; MCBEE, W.; KAMAT, V. R. (2015) Vision guided autonomous robotic assembly and as-built scanning on unstructured construction sites. Automation in Construction, n. 59, p. 128-138.
FOX, G. L. (2013) Weaving webs of innovation. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 33, n. 1, p. 5-24.
GANGULY, A.; NILCHIANI, R.; FARR, V. J. (2009) Evaluating agility in corporate enterprises. International Journal of Production Economics, n. 188, p. 410-423.
HASLE, P.; BOJESEN, A.; JENSEN, P. L.; BRAMMING, P. (2012) Lean and the working environment: a review of the literature. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 32, n. 7, p. 829-849.
HENDRY, L.; HUANG, Y.; STEVENSON, M. (2013) Workload control Successful implementation taking a contingency-based view of production planning and control. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 33 n. 1, p. 69-103.
HU, Q.; MASON, R.; WILLIANS, S. J.; FOUND, P. (2015) Lean implementation within SMEs: a literature review. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, v. 26, n. 7, p. 980-1012.
KAFETZOPOULOS, D.; PSOMAS, E. (2015) The impact of innovation capability on the performance of manufacturing companies - The Greek case. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, v. 26, n. 1, p. 104-130.
KAMALAHMADI, M.; PARAST, M. M. (2017) An assessment of supply chain disruption mitigation strategies. International Journal of Production Economics, n. 184, p. 210-230.
KOTHARI, C. R. (2004) Research Methodology Methods and Techniques. New Age International Publishers, New Delhi.
KUMAR, R. (2011) Research Methodology a step-by-step guide for beginners. SAGE Publications Ltd, London.
KUULA, M.; PUTKIRANTA, A.; TOIVANEN, J. (2012) Coping with the change: a longitudinal study into the changing manufacturing practices. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 32, n. 2, p. 106-120.
LEITE, M.; BRAZ, V. (2016) Agile manufacturing practices for new product development: industrial case studies. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, v. 27, n. 4, p. 560-576.
MARODIN, G. A.; SAURIN, T. A. (2015) Classification and relationships between risks that affect lean production implementation - A study in southern Brazil. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, v. 26, n. 1, p. 57-79.
MOHAMMADDUST, F.; REZAPOUR, S.; FARAHANI, R. Z.; MOFIDFAR, M.; HILL, A. (2017) Developing lean and responsive supply chains: A robust model for alternative risk mitigation strategies in supply chain designs. International Journal of Production Economics, n. 183, p. 632-653.
MUND, K.; PIETERSE, K.; CAMERON, S. (2015) Lean product engineering in the South African automotive industry. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, v. 26, n. 5, p. 703-724.
NARAYANAMURTHY, G.; GURUMURTHY, A. (2016) Systemic leanness an index for facilitating continuous improvement of lean implementation. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, v. 27, n. 8, p. 1014-1053.
OKE, A. (2013) Linking manufacturing flexibility to innovation performance in manufacturing plants. International Journal of Production Economics, n. 143, p. 242-247.
OTA, M.; HAZAMA, Y.; SAMSON, D. (2013) Japanese innovation processes. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 33, n. 3, p. 275-295.
PAKDIL, F.; LEONARD, K. M. (2015) The effect of organizational culture on implementing and sustaining lean processes. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, v. 26, n. 5, p. 725-743.
PANDEY, P.; PANDEY, M. M. (2015) Research Methodology: Tools and Techniques. Bridge Center, 2015
PANWAR, A.; JAIN, R.; RATHORE, A. P. S. (2015) Lean implementation in Indian process industries – some empirical evidence. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, v. 26, n. 1, p. 131-160.
PÉRY, C. D.; AGERON, B.; NEUBERT, G. (2013) A service science framework to enhance value creation in service innovation projects. An rfid case study. International Journal of Production Economics, n. 141, p. 440-451.
SÄFSTEN, K.; JOHANSSON, G.; LAKEMOND, N.; MAGNUSSON, T. (2014) Interface challenges and managerial issues in the industrial innovation process. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, v. 25, n. 2, p. 218-239.
SILVEIRA, G. J. C.; SNIDER, B.; BALAKRISHNAN, J. (2013) Compensation-based incentives, ERP and delivery performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 33, n. 4, p. 415-441.
THANKI, S. J.; THAKKAR, J. (2014) Status of lean manufacturing practices in Indian industries and government initiatives - A pilot study. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, v. 25, n. 5, p. 655-675.
THEYEL, G.; HOFMANN, K. H. (2015) Environmental practices and innovation performance of US small and medium-sized manufacturers. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, v. 26, n. 3, p. 333-348.
VENTO, M. O.; ALCARAZ, J. L. G.; MACÍAS, A. A. M.; LOYA, V. M. (2016) The impact of managerial commitment and Kaizen benefits on companies. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, v. 27, n. 5, p. 692-712.
VRIES, J. (2013) The influence of power and interest on designing inventory management systems. International Journal of Production Economics, n. 143, p. 233-241.
WALLIN, J.; PARIDA, V.; ISAKSSON, O. (2015) Understanding product-service system innovation capabilities development for manufacturing companies. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, v. 26, n. 5, p. 763-787.
WICKRAMASINGHE, V.; WICKRAMASINGHE, G. L. D. (2016) Variable pay and job performance of shop-floor workers in lean production. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, v. 27, n. 2, p. 287-311.
YANG, M. G. M.; HONG, P.; MODI, S. B. (2011) Impact of lean manufacturing and environmental management on business performance: An empirical study of manufacturing firms. International Journal of Production Economics, n. 129, p. 251-261.
YANG, C. L.; LIN, S. P.; CHAN, Y. H.; SHEU, C. (2010) Mediated effect of environmental management on manufacturing competitiveness: an empirical study. International Journal of Production Economics, n. 123, p. 210-220.
ZU, X.; KAYNAK, H. (2012) An agency theory perspective on supply chain quality management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 32, n. 4, p. 423-446.