Comparative analysis on the adoption of innovation in furniture companies

Main Article Content

Rodolfo Reinaldo Hermes Petter
Luis Maurício Resende
Pedro Paulo de Andrade Júnior

Abstract

This study aimed to identify factors categorical adoption of innovation in three main groups: in products, processes and administrative procedures in a group of micro and small enterprises in the furniture sector, located in the middle western state of Santa Catarina. In particular, the study sought to compare the data of a survey conducted by SEBRAE (2009) observed the same factors present innovation in micro and small businesses scattered throughout the Brazilian territory, in order to compare the national stage for the adoption of innovation in relation the scenario presented by the companies studied in this research. Data collection took place by means of a questionnaire consisting of multiple choice closed questions related to the three aforementioned groups of innovation, which was answered by managers of the constituent companies of the group studied. As a result of this research, it was found that the adoption of innovation in product development is the most important aspect in the surveyed companies. It was also found that they seek to adopt the innovation with the objective of entering new markets. However, the main difficulty in adopting innovation were identified lack of skilled labor, shortage and / or lack of access to technology and financial difficulties. Compared to general adoption of innovation by micro and small enterprises studied by SEBRAE (2009), the studied firms have a tendency to develop in the same direction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

AMOESC – Associação dos Moveleiros do Oeste de Santa Catarina. (2010) Planejamento Estratégico e Financeiro, 2009. Chapecó.

ANDREASSI, T. (2007) Gestão da Inovação tecnológica. São Paulo: Thomson Learning.

FERREIRA, M. J. B.; et al. (2008) Relatório de acompanhamento setorial, indústria moveleira. Campinas: Unicamp, ABDI, v. 1.

FLOYSAND, A.; JAKOBSEN, S. E. (2010) The complexity of innovation: A relational turn. Progress in Human Geography. v. 35, n. 3, p. 328-344.

GOEDHUYS, M.; VEUGELERS, R. (2011) Innovation strategies, process and product innovations and growth: Firm-level evidence from Brazil. Structural Changeand Economic Dynamics. DOI:10.1016/j.strueco.2011.01.004.

HITT, M. A.; IRELAND, R. D.; HOSKISSON, R. E. (2008) Administração Estratégica. 7. ed. São Paulo – SP: Thomson Learning, p. 415.

IEMI – Instituto de Estudos e Marketing Industrial. (2009) Brasil Móveis: Relatório setorial de indústria de móveis no Brasil. São Paulo – SP.

MARION FILHO, P. J.; SONAGLIO, S. M. (2010) Inovações tecnológicas na indústria de móveis: Uma avaliação a partir da concentração produtiva de Bento Gonçalves (RS). Revista Brasileira de Inovação. v. 9, n. 1, p. 93-118.

PEGORARO, P. R.; SILVÉRIO, A. C. (2010) A Inovação nas Empresas, como um dos Fatores de Crescimento. Revista CAP. v. 4, n. 4.

PEREIRA; et al. (2009) Fatores de inovação para a sobrevivência das micro e pequenas empresas no Brasil. Revista de Administração e Inovação – RAI. São Paulo, v. 6, n. 1, p. 50-65.

PORTER, M. E. (2005) Estratégia Competitiva: Técnicas para Análise de Indústrias e da Concorrência. 4ª ed. 409 p. Elsevier, São Paulo.

RESE, A.; BAIER, D. (2011) Success factors for innovation management in networks of small and medium enterprises. R&D Management, v. 41, n. 2.

ROCHA, L. M. P.; DUFLOTH, S. C. (2009) Análise comparativa regional de indicadores de inovação tecnológica empresarial: contribuição a partir dos dados da pesquisa industrial de inovação tecnológica. Revista Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação. v. 14, n 1.

SEBRAE – Serviço Brasileiro de Apoio às Micro e Pequenas Empresas. (2009) Inovação e Competitividade nas MPEs Brasileiras – set. São Paulo: Sebrae.

TRIPPL, M. (2010) Developing Cross-Border Regional Innovation Systems: Key Factors and Challenges. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie. v. 101, n. 2, p. 150-160.