Procurement selection criteria for projects in the public sector: evidence from Nigeria
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
صندلی اداریAbstract
The selection of suitable procurement practice for construction projects is a very complex and demanding tasks for stakeholders in the construction industry. In spite of the overabundance of techniques and tools accessible to the stakeholders in selecting an appropriate procurement method, clients are faced with the decision as to which of the selection criteria can be adopted for a given construction project to achieve project goals and objectives. This paper focused on evaluating the existing procurement methods being practised in the Nigerian construction industry with a view to identifying and establishing the parameters for selection that will improve contract delivery systems. In this research, quantitative approach was used to collect data from 420 contractors, consultants and clients based in the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja where large numbers of building projects are being procured. The findings revealed six most commonly considered criteria and deduced that, the quality, cost and duration of the project determines the type of procurement method to adopt. It is therefore stated that in selecting any particular procurement method for building construction projects, the complexity of such project should be clearly defined and the other performance indicators be given adequate consideration for a successful project delivery that will enhance the achievement of the client’s goal.
Downloads
Article Details
1. Proposal of Policy for Free Access Periodics
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in an institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
Proposal of Policy for Periodic that offer Postponed Free Access
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 [SPECIFY TIME HERE] after the publication, allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
d. They allow some kind of open dissemination. Authors can disseminate their articles in open access, but with specific conditions imposed by the editor that are related to:
Version of the article that can be deposited in the repository:
Pre-print: before being reviewed by pairs.
Post-print: once reviewed by pairs, which can be:
The version of the author that has been accepted for publication.
The editor's version, that is, the article published in the magazine.
At which point the article can be made accessible in an open manner: before it is published in the magazine, immediately afterwards or if a period of seizure is required, which can range from six months to several years.
Where to leave open: on the author's personal web page, only departmental websites, the repository of the institution, the file of the research funding agency, among others.
References
ADESANYA, O. M. (1992) Management Contracting Concepts and Nigeria’s Construction Industry. A Paper Presented At the Joint Seminar on Management Contract of Quantity Surveyors Registration Board of Nigeria and Nigerian Institute of Quantity (18th September 1992, Lagos)
BABATUNDE, S. O.; OPAWOLE, A.; UJADDUGHE, I. C. (2010) An Appraisal of Procurement Methods in the Nigerian Construction Industry. Civil Engineering Dimension, v.12, p. 56-58.
BOWEN, P. A.; PEARL, R. G.; EDWARDS, P. J. (1999) Client briefing processes and procurement method selection: a South African study. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, v. 6, n. 2, p. 91–104.
BROWN, J. T. (2010) Procurement issues with construction build-up in Nigeria. Retrieved from; http://www.bloggeddown-inprocuremnt.blogspot.com (Accessed on the 21st of December 2012)
CHEONG, Y. Y. (2011) Accelerating Change in the Malaysian Construction Industry through Procurement method. Retrieved from; www.academia.edu/233011/accelration.html/ (Accessed On the 11th December 2012)
COHEN, L.; MANION, L.; MORRISON, K. (2000) Research Methods in Education. New York: Routledge Falmer.
ENEKWECHI, C. O. (1993) Construction Management as a Contract Procurement System’, Builders Magazine, v. vii, n. 6, p. 17-18
GEORGE, D.; MALLERY, P. (2003) SPSS for window Step by Step. Fourth edition. Retrieved from; iase-web.org/../SERJ2 (2)_Mills.pdf (Accessed on the 26th October, 2012).
GORDON, C. M. (1994) Choosing appropriate construction contracting method. Journal of Construction, Engineering and Management, v. 120, n. 1, p. 196-210.
JAAFAR, M.; NURUDDIN, A. R. (2012) The development of Public and Private Construction procurement system in the Malaysian construction industry. Journal of Design and Built environment, v. 11, p. 1-11.
LOVE, P. E. D.; SKITMORE, R. M.; EARL, G. (1998) Selecting an appropriate procurement method for a building project. Construction Management and Economics, v. 16, p. 221-223.
LUU, D. T.; NG, S. T.; CHEN, S. E. (2005) Formulating procurement selection criteria through case based reasoning approach. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, v. 19, n. 3, 269-276.
MAIZON, H.; MELISSA, C. Y.; NG, C. Y.; NG, S. H.; SHIM, M. H.; TAY, L. Y. (2006) Factors Influencing the Selection of Procurement Systems by Clients. Proceeding of International Conference on Construction Industry 2006, Padang, Indonesia, 21st June – 25th June 1-10.
MASTERMAN, J. W. E.; GAMESON, R. N. (1994) Client characteristics and needs in relation to their selection of building procurement systems. Proceedings of CIB W-92 International Procurement Symposium, 'East Meets West', Department of Surveying, University of Hong Kong, 4-7 December 1994.
MATHONSI, M. O.; THWALA, W. D. (2012) Factors influencing the selection of procurement systems in the South African construction industry. African Journal of Business Management, v. 6, n. 3, p. 583-594.
MORTLEDGE, R.; SMITH, A.; KASHIWAGI, D. T. (2006) Building Procurement. Oxford: Blackwell.
National Economic Development Office (NEDO) (1985) Think About Building. London: NEDC
NG, T. S.; LUU, D. C.; CHEN, S. E. (2002) Decision criteria and their subjectivity in construction Procurement selection. The Australian Journal of Construction Economics and Building, v. 2, n. 1, p. 70-80.
NOAUM, S. G. (1994) Critical analysis of time and cost of management and traditional contracts. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, v. 120, n. 4, p. 687-705.
OGUNSEMI, D. R.; AJE I. O. (2006) A Model for Contractor Selection in Nigeria. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, v. 11, n. 1, p. 33-43.
MAIZON, H. (1997) Clients’ Criteria on the Choice of Procurement Systems - A Malaysian Experience. Proceedings of CIB W92: Procurement – A Key to Innovation. Montreal. p. 273-284.
OJO, A. E.; GBADEBO M. A. (2012) Critical Selection Criteria for Appropriate Procurement Strategy for Project Delivery in Nigeria. Journal of Emerging Trends in Economics and Management Sciences (JETEMS), v. 3, n. 5, p. 422-428.
ROWLINSON, S. (1999) Selection criteria. In. S. Rowlinson, and P. McDermott, Procurement Systems: A Guide to Best Practice in Construction. London: E & F Spon
SKITMORE, R. M.; MARSDEN, D. E. (1988) Which procurement system? Towards a universal procurement selection technique. Construction Management and Economics, v. 6, p. 71-89.
TURNER, A. (1990) Building Procurement. London: Macmillan Surveying Series