Computer Games and Their Impact on Creativity of Primary Level Students in Tehran
Main Article Content
Abstract
Creativity is about being sensitive to dilemmas, losses, problems, and existing errors, making propositions about and examining such issues, which finally leads to innovative findings. On the other hand, it seems that games are important in this process; since they can improve creativity of the individuals. Thus, this research pays attention to the question that whether computer games affect creativity of students at primary level in schools or not? Moreover, in this study, students of 3 main districts of Tehran municipality were studied. Based on the available data of the ministry, there were 51740 students studying in these three districts. Thus, 381 students were randomly selected as the research sample. Findings revealed that all computer games, i.e. puzzle, intellectual, and enigma, affect creativity of students at primary level in schools to different extents.
Downloads
Article Details
1. Proposal of Policy for Free Access Periodics
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in an institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
Proposal of Policy for Periodic that offer Postponed Free Access
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 [SPECIFY TIME HERE] after the publication, allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
d. They allow some kind of open dissemination. Authors can disseminate their articles in open access, but with specific conditions imposed by the editor that are related to:
Version of the article that can be deposited in the repository:
Pre-print: before being reviewed by pairs.
Post-print: once reviewed by pairs, which can be:
The version of the author that has been accepted for publication.
The editor's version, that is, the article published in the magazine.
At which point the article can be made accessible in an open manner: before it is published in the magazine, immediately afterwards or if a period of seizure is required, which can range from six months to several years.
Where to leave open: on the author's personal web page, only departmental websites, the repository of the institution, the file of the research funding agency, among others.
References
ALLISON, D. (2004) Creativity, students’ academic writing, and EAP: exploring comments on writing in an English language degree programme. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, v. 3, n. 3, p. 191-209.
AMORY, A.; NAICKER, K.; VINCENT, J.; ADAMS, C. (1999) The use of computer games as an educational tool: identification of appropriate game types and game elements. British Journal of Educational Technology, v. 30, n. 4, p. 311-321.
ANDERSEN, P. H.; KRAGH, H. (2015) Exploring boundary-spanning practices among creativity managers. Management Decision, v. 53, n. 4, p. 786-808.
BEGHETTO, R. A. (2007) Ideational code‐switching: Walking the talk about supporting student creativity in the classroom. Roeper Review, v. 29, n. 4, p. 265-270.
BETZ, J. A. (1995) Computer games: Increase learning in an interactive multidisciplinary environment. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, v. 24, n. 2, p. 195-205.
CLEMENTE, F. M.; COUCEIRO, M. S.; MARTINS, F. M. L.; MENDES, R. S. (2015) Using network metrics in soccer: A macro-analysis. Journal of human kinetics, v. 45, n. 1, p. 123-134.
CLEMENTE, K. (1990) Playing with performance: the element of the game in experimental dance and theater. The Journal of Popular Culture, v. 24, n. 3, p. 1-10.
CORBIN, E. I. (1974) The autonomous ego functions in creativity. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association.
CROPLEY, D. H. (2016) Creativity in engineering, p. 155-173. Springer Singapore.
CSIKSZENTMIHALYI, M. (1999) 16 Implications of a Systems Perspective for the Study of Creativity. In Handbook of creativity, p. 313-335. Cambridge University Press.
DACEY, J. S. (1989) Peak periods of creative growth across the lifespan. The Journal of Creative Behavior, v. 23, n. 4, p. 224-247.
GUNAWARDHANA, L. P. D.; PALANIAPPAN, S. (2015) Psychology of Digital Games and Its Effects to Its Users. Creative Education, v. 6, n. 16, p. 17-26.
HAMLEN, K. R. (2009) Relationships between computer and video game play and creativity among upper elementary school students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, v. 40, n. 1, p. 1-21.
HOLT, K. (1988) Product innovation management: a workbook for management in industry. Butterworths.
JANG, S. J. (2009) Exploration of secondary students’ creativity by integrating web-based technology into an innovative science curriculum. Computers & Education, v. 52, n. 1, p. 247-255.
JONES, W. H.; CHERNOVETZ, M. E.; HANSSON, R. O. (1978) The enigma of androgyny: Differential implications for males and females?. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, v. 46, n. 2, p. 298.
KAFAI, Y. B.; BURKE, Q. (2015) Constructionist gaming: Understanding the benefits of making games for learning. Educational Psychologist, v. 50, n. 4, p. 313-334.
KAUFMANN, G. (2003) What to measure? A new look at the concept of creativity. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, v. 47, n. 3, p. 235-251.
LEE, J.; LUCHINI, K.; MICHAEL, B.; NORRIS, C.; SOLOWAY, E. (2004) More than just fun and games: Assessing the value of educational video games in the classroom. In CHI'04 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, p. 1375-1378. ACM.
MEDNICK, S. (1962) The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological review, v. 69, n. 3, p. 220.
NYSTRÖM, H. (1993). Creativity and entrepreneurship. Creativity and Innovation Management, v. 2, n. 4, p. 237-242.
OTT, M.; POZZI, F. (2012) Digital games as creativity enablers for children. Behaviour & Information Technology, v. 31, n. 10, p. 1011-1019.
PARNES, S. J.; HARDING, H. F. (Eds.) (1962) A source book for creative thinking. Scribner.
PROCTOR, R. M.; BURNETT, P. C. (2004) Measuring cognitive and dispositional characteristics of creativity in elementary students. Creativity Research Journal, v. 16, n. 4, p. 421-429.
MARKOVIC, R. M., & SALAMZADEH, A. (2012) The Nature of Entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurs and Entrepreneurial Activities. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing: Germany.
ROBBINS, S. P. (1977) Reconciling management theory with management practice. Business Horizons, v. 20, n. 1, p. 38-47.
ROSATO, J. L. (1995) All I ever needed to know about teaching law school I learned teaching kindergarten: Introducing gaming techniques into the law school classroom. Journal of Legal Education, v. 45, n. 4, p. 568-581.
SANNINO, A.; ELLIS, V. (2015) Learning and Collective Creativity. Routledge.
TAN, A. G. (2015) Connecting Theory, Research, and Practice in the Psychology of Creativity: An Introduction to a Special Issue. The Journal of Creative Behavior.
TEKIN, M.; YILDIZ, M.; YILDIRIM, Y.; MUTLU, O.; SAHAN, H. (2012) Examination of the effect of educational game activities on the levels of creativity of the students attending to elementary schools in Turkey.Energy Education Science And Technology Part B-Social And Educational Studies, v. 4, n. 3, p. 1337-1344.
TORRANCE, E. P.; GOFF, K. (1990) Fostering academic creativity in gifted students (ERIC EC Digest No. E484). Arlington, VA: ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED321489). Retrieved March, 1, 2016.
TREFFINGER, D. J.; YOUNG, G. C.; SELBY, E. C.; SHEPARDSON, C. (2002) Assessing Creativity: A Guide for Educators. National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
TÜZÜN, H.; YILMAZ-SOYLU, M.; KARAKUŞ, T.; İNAL, Y.; KIZILKAYA, G. (2009) The effects of computer games on primary school students’ achievement and motivation in geography learning. Computers & Education, v. 52, n. 1, p. 68-77.
ULRICH, F. (2015) A Group Creativity Support System for Dynamic Idea Evaluation. In Nordic Contributions in IS Research, p. 137-151. Springer International Publishing.
VANDENBERG, B. (1980) Play, problem‐solving, and creativity. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, y. 1980, n. 9, p. 49-68.
YANG, Y. T. C. (2012) Building virtual cities, inspiring intelligent citizens: Digital games for developing students’ problem solving and learning motivation. Computers & Education, v. 59, n. 2, p. 365-377.
YOUNG, M. F.; SLOTA, S.; CUTTER, A. B.; JALETTE, G.; MULLIN, G.; LAI, B.; YUKHYMENKO, M. (2012) Our princess is in another castle a review of trends in serious gaming for education. Review of educational research, v. 82, n. 1, p. 61-89.