Analysis of performance evaluation model through the balanced scorecard in a footwear industry
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
In recent decades, significant changes have been noted in the business world, due to the increasing demand of customers, political and economic moments that create a dynamic nonmarket increasingly unstable, contributing to increasing challenges in understanding the demands. The objective was to evaluate the model operations management method BSC, in order to reduce costs and increase productivity and competitiveness. A study was conducted through a semi-open process, with 180 employees at a midsize company in the footwear industry Jaú, collecting information and data from the managers of each area. We conclude that the requirements for improved performance within organizations have made approaches for the management of operations evolve, becoming a broad and network management in the business, contributing to improvements in the condition of growth and sustainability of organizational activity. It is noteworthy, then, the need to use all available resources, minimizing problems and maximizing opportunities.
Downloads
Article Details
1. Proposal of Policy for Free Access Periodics
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in an institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
Proposal of Policy for Periodic that offer Postponed Free Access
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 [SPECIFY TIME HERE] after the publication, allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
d. They allow some kind of open dissemination. Authors can disseminate their articles in open access, but with specific conditions imposed by the editor that are related to:
Version of the article that can be deposited in the repository:
Pre-print: before being reviewed by pairs.
Post-print: once reviewed by pairs, which can be:
The version of the author that has been accepted for publication.
The editor's version, that is, the article published in the magazine.
At which point the article can be made accessible in an open manner: before it is published in the magazine, immediately afterwards or if a period of seizure is required, which can range from six months to several years.
Where to leave open: on the author's personal web page, only departmental websites, the repository of the institution, the file of the research funding agency, among others.
References
ATTADIA, L. C. L.; CANAVAROLO, M. E.; MARTINS; R. A. (2003) Balanced Scorecard: Uma análise crítica. In: ENCONTRO NACIONAL DE ENGENHARIA DE PRODUÇÃO, 23, 2003, Ouro Preto. Anais... Ouro Preto: ABEPRO.
CAVENAGHI, V. (2001) Gestão do desempenho empresarial: A contribuição da área de manufatura. Tese (Doutorado em Engenharia de Produção) Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia de Produção, USP, São Paulo.
CORRÊA, H. L.; CORRÊA, C. A. (2005) Administração de Produção e Operações: Manufatura e Serviços: uma abordagem estratégica. ed. compacta, São Paulo: Atlas.
EVANS, J. R. (1997) Production Operations Management: Quality, Performance and Value, 5th ed. St. Paul: West.
JOHNSTON, R.; CLARK, G. (2002) Administração de Operações e Serviço, São Paulo: Atlas.
KAPLAN, R. S.; NORTON, D. P. (2001) Transforming the balanced scorecard from performance measurement to strategic management: Part II. Accouting Horizons. v. 15, n. 2, p. 147-160.
KAPLAN, R. S.; NORTON, D. P. (2004) Mapas Estratégicos: convertendo ativos intangíveis em resultados tangíveis. Rio de Janeiro: Campus.
KAPLAN, R. S.; NORTON, D. P. (2006) Response to S. Voepel et al. “The tyranny of the Balanced Scorecard in the innovation economy”. Journal of Intellectual Capital. v. 7, n. 3, p. 421-428.
KAPLAN, R. S. (2005) How the balanced scorecard complements the McKinsey 7-S model. Strategy & Leadership. Chicago, v. 33, n. 3, p. 41-46.
LEBAS, M. J. (1995) Performance measurement and performance management. International Journal of Production Economics. v. 41, p. 23-35.
LIMA, T. C. S.; MIOTO, R. C. T. (2007) Procedimentos metodológicos na construção do conhecimento científico: a pesquisa bibliográfica. Revista Katál. Florianopolis, v. 10, n. esp., p. 37-45.
MARCHESAN, C. H.; MIORANDO R. F.; CATEN, C. S. (2006), Building Competitive Advantage using Performance Evaluation. In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE IN INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 12., 2006, Fortaleza. Proceedings... Rio de Janeiro: ABEPRO.
MARTINS, R. A. (1998) Sistemas de Medição de Desempenho: Um modelo para Estruturação do Uso. Tese (Doutorado em Engenharia de Produção) - Programa de Pós- Graduação em Engenharia de Produção, USP, São Paulo.
MENDES, D. P. (2002) O Balanced Scorecard como instrumento de avaliação do nível de desempenho logístico em uma empresa de prestação de serviços. Dissertação (Mestrado em Engenharia de Produção) – Programa de Pós- Graduação em Engenharia de Produção, UFSC, Florianópolis.
NIVEN, P. R. (2002) Balanced Scorecard step-by-step: Maximizing Performance and Maintaining Results, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
NEELY, A.; GREGORY, M.; PLATTS, K. (1995) Performance measurement system design. International Journal of Operations Management. Cambridge, v. 14, n. 4, p. 81-114.
PRIETO, V. C.; PEREIRA, F. L. A.; CARVALHO, M. M. C.; LAURINDO, F. J. B. (2006) Fatores críticos na implementação do balanced scorecard. Gestão & Produção. v. 13, n. 1, p. 81-92.
RODRIGUES, P. C. C.; OLIVEIRA, O. J. (2008) A study of management of intermediate inventory in the manufacture of paper products in Brazilian companies. In: PRODUCTION and OPERATION MANAGEMENT SOCIETY 2008, La Jolla. Proceedings... La Jolla: POMS, 1 CD-ROM.
RODRIGUES, P. C. C.; OLIVEIRA, O. J. (2009a) The importance of analysis of production system Engineering-To-Order and Make-To-Stock in two business sector graph In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE IN INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 15., 2009, Salvador. Proceedings... Salvador: ABEPRO.
RODRIGUES, P. C. C.; OLIVEIRA, O. J. (2009b) Analysis of the Influence of Strategic Management of ETO Demand on Management of Stock in a Printing Industry In: PRODUCTION and OPERATION MANAGEMENT SOCIETY 2009, Orlando. Proceedings... Orlando: POMS.
SANTOS, G. T.; ROSSI, G.; JARDILINO, J. R. L. (2000) Orientações metodológicas para elaboração de trabalhos acadêmicos. 2 ed. São Paulo: Gion Editora.
VOEPEL, S. C.; LEIBOLD, M.; ECKHOFF, R. A. (2006) The tyranny of the Balanced Scorecard in the innovation economy. Journal of Intellectual Capital. v. 7, p. 43-60.
YIN, R. K. (2005) Estudo de caso: planejamento e métodos. 3 ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman.