Evaluation of the machine modernity in the motor industry
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Most manufacturing companies realize its technologies, implemented through concrete machinery parts. They differ in terms of importance, the relevance of their selection and the level of their modernity. The purpose of this article is to analyse the chosen production machine in terms of its modernity. The ABC technology method was chosen do this research. All parts of the machine were divided into three groups: parts of main subassembly A, parts of supportive subassembly B, parts of collateral subassembly C. Then each of these parts was evaluated in the Parker's five-point scale. From the conducted analysis it results that most parts of the research machine were manufactured with more complex technologies, requiring technical skills and knowledge or with unchanging technologies used for years. It means that the research machine is not a modern machine. Perhaps company managers should take a decision on the change of the machine for the newer one. This would allow for improvement of the technical parameters of the products, increase in production efficiency and reduction of the amount of nonconforming products. Therefore, it can be concluded that a properly selected and correctly applied parts of the subassemblies contribute to the improvement in quality of products and the efficiency of the machine.
Downloads
Article Details
1. Proposal of Policy for Free Access Periodics
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in an institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
Proposal of Policy for Periodic that offer Postponed Free Access
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 [SPECIFY TIME HERE] after the publication, allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
d. They allow some kind of open dissemination. Authors can disseminate their articles in open access, but with specific conditions imposed by the editor that are related to:
Version of the article that can be deposited in the repository:
Pre-print: before being reviewed by pairs.
Post-print: once reviewed by pairs, which can be:
The version of the author that has been accepted for publication.
The editor's version, that is, the article published in the magazine.
At which point the article can be made accessible in an open manner: before it is published in the magazine, immediately afterwards or if a period of seizure is required, which can range from six months to several years.
Where to leave open: on the author's personal web page, only departmental websites, the repository of the institution, the file of the research funding agency, among others.
References
BORKOWSKI, S.; INGALDI, M. (2013) Workers Evaluations of Ribbed Wire Competition and Rolling Mill Technological Possibilities. In METAL 2013: 22nd INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON METALLURGY AND MATERIALS. Conference Proceedings: 15–17. 5, Brno, Hotel Voroněž, Czech Republic, Ostrava, TANGER Ltd., p. 1920-1925.
BORKOWSKI, S.; SELEJDAK, J.; SALAMON, S. (2006) Efektywność eksploatacji maszyn i urządzeń, 1ed. Częstochowa: WZPCzęst.
BORKOWSKI, S.; ULEWICZ, R. (2009) Instrumenty doskonalenia procesów produkcyjnych. Instruments of Production Processes Improvement. 1 ed., Warszawa: PTM.
FUTAS, P.; PRIBULOVA, A. (2013) Computer simulation of casting produced by investment casting technology. International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management, SGEM, v. 1, p. 29-36.
INGALDI, M. (2013) Determination of the technological position of the courier services company. International Journal Transport & Logistics, v. 13, n. 28.
KAHNEMAN, D.; TVERSKY, A. (2000) Choice, Values, Frames, 1 ed. Cambridge: University Press.
KARDAS, E. (2010) Wykorzystanie metody ABC do analizy materiałów w wybranym zakładzie wielkopiecowym. Logistyka, n. 4, p. 64-68.
KONSTANCIAK, M. (2012), Analysis of technological strategies on the example of the production of the tramway wheels. Archives of Materials Science and Engineering, v. 57, n. 2.
LESTYÁNSZKA ŠKŮRKOVÁ, K.; KUDIČOVÁ, J. (2011) The process capability study of pressing process for force closed. Vedecké práce MtF STU v Bratislave so sídlom v Trnave. Research papers Faculty of Materials Science and Technology Slovak University of Technology in Trnava, v. 19, n. 30, p. 51-57.
LOWE, P. (1995) Management of Technology: Perception and Opportunities, 1 ed. London: Chapman & Hall.
NIGHTINGALE, J. (2008) Think Smart - Act Smart: Avoiding The Business Mistakes That Even Intelligent People Make, 1 ed., John Wiley & Sons.
PAULIČEK T.; ČIČO P.; ORŠULA V.; JANKAJOVÁ E.; HOLOTA T.; KOTUS M. (2014) Hodnotenie poruchovosti obrábacieho centra metódou FMEA = Evaluation of failure machining center by the FMEA method. Kvalita, technológie, diagnostika v technických systémoch = Quality, technologies, diagnostics of technical systems. Zborník vedeckých prác. Slovenská poľnohospodárska univerzita v Nitre, Nitra 2014, p. 74-79.
PUSTĚJOVSKÁ, P.; JURSOVÁ, S.; BROŽOVÁ, S. (2013) Technical-economic Prospects of Utilization of Alternative Ironmaking Techniques in Metallurgy. In METAL 2012: 21th ANNIVERSARY INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON METALLURGY AND MATERIALS. Conference Proceedings: 23.-25. 5. 2012, Brno, Hotel Voroněž, Czech Republic Ostrava, TANGER Ltd., p. 1729-1733.
ROSAK-SZYROCKA, J.; KONSTANCIAK, M.; KNOP, K. (2010) Meaning of technological up-to-dateness and efficiency of machines used in HACPP system. In BORKOWSKI, S.; SELEJDAK, J. (Ed.) Operating efficiency and machines modernity. Sisak: Endi Miletić, p. 57-70.
SELEJDAK, J. (2002) Analysis of Factors Influencing Seamed Tubes Quality. Metalurgija, v. 41, n. 3.
SELEJDAK, J.; KONSTANCIAK, M.; MIELCZAREK, K. (2010) Evaluation of technological efficiency and up-to-dateness of machines used in building industry. In BORKOWSKI, S.; SELEJDAK, J. (Ed.) Operating efficiency and machines modernity. Sisak: Endi Miletić, p. 33-46.