Institutionalization of Accounting and Auditing Services in Ukraine: Genesis, Evaluation, Analysis
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of the article is to consider the impact of institutionalization processes and regulations on the development of accounting and auditing services. The research is based on the analysis of the development of the institutional framework for the provision of audit services. Comparisons of the composition of regulatory support with the actual structure of accounting and auditing services on the basis of statistical data of the Audit Chamber of Ukraine for the period from 2011 to 2019 indicate the problems in institutional support. The purpose of the article is to answer the questions: 1) whether the legislative regulation has an impact on the volume of orders for statutory audit; 2) how the regulations have influenced the development of methodological support for the provision of audit services; 3) whether the practice and theory of audit services need convergence at the institutional level. The authors correlate classification of audit services in normative documents, including documents of the professional organization of auditors. The issue of institutionalization is considered in the context of the interaction of accounting problems at the national level in Ukraine and the practice of auditors. It has been proven that the provision of accounting services and services is a priority in the activities of auditors. A separate area of research is the institutional principles of activity, requirements for quality of work. The study indicated a decrease in the number of audit entities in Ukraine. The results of the study have shown that there are differences between legal regulation and practice. The conclusion of this paper helps to identify vectors in the development of a regulatory framework of audit services national level.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. Proposal of Policy for Free Access Periodics
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in an institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
Proposal of Policy for Periodic that offer Postponed Free Access
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 [SPECIFY TIME HERE] after the publication, allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
d. They allow some kind of open dissemination. Authors can disseminate their articles in open access, but with specific conditions imposed by the editor that are related to:
Version of the article that can be deposited in the repository:
Pre-print: before being reviewed by pairs.
Post-print: once reviewed by pairs, which can be:
The version of the author that has been accepted for publication.
The editor's version, that is, the article published in the magazine.
At which point the article can be made accessible in an open manner: before it is published in the magazine, immediately afterwards or if a period of seizure is required, which can range from six months to several years.
Where to leave open: on the author's personal web page, only departmental websites, the repository of the institution, the file of the research funding agency, among others.
References
Abdulrahman, A.M., Al-Twaijre, Abrierle, A. & William D. (2003). The development of internal audit in Saudi Arabia: an institutional theory perspective. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 14(5), 507-531. Avaible at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1045235402001582. Access: 18 November 2020
Antoniuk, O., Chyzevska, L. & Semenyshena, N. (2019). Legal Regulation and Trends of Audit Services: what are the differences (evidence of Ukraine). Independent Journal of Management & Production, 10(7), 673-686. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v10i7.903.
Antoniuk, O., Kuzyk, N., Zhurakovska, I., Sydorenko, R., & Sakhno, L. (2020). The Role of «Big Four» Auditing Firms in the Public Procurement Market in Ukraine. Independent Journal of Management & Production, 11(9), 2483-2495. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v11i9.1432.
Audit Chamber of Ukraine (2020) Reports of the Audit Chamber of Ukraine to the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. Avaible at: https://www.apu.com.ua/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/%. Access: 18 November 2020.
Baker, C. R., Bedard, J., & Prat Dit Hauret, C. (2014). The regulation of statutory auditing: an institutional theory approach. Managerial Auditing Journal, 29(5), 371-394. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-09-2013-0931. Access: 13 November 2020.
Baskerville, R., & Grossi, G. (2019) Glocalization of accounting standards: Observations on neo-institutionalism of IPSAS. Journal Public Money & Management, 39(2), 95-103. Avaible at: https://www.tandfonline.com/¬doi/abs/10.1080/09540962.¬2019.¬1580¬894. Access: 12 November 2020.
Brun, S. Frey (1994). Supreme auditing institutions: A politico-economic analysis. European Journal of Law and Economics, 1, 169–176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01552468.
Сhekavinskay, G. (2019). Justification of the Institutional Approach to Audit (2018) Conference: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference "Far East Con" (ISCFEC 2018). January 2019. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 47. Avaible at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330915656_-Justification_of_¬theInstitutional_Approach_to_Audit/link/5e9c726e¬92851c2f52b0880e/-download. Access: 11 November 2020.
Coffie, W., & Bedi, I. (2019). The Effects of IFRS Adoption and Firm Size on Audit Fees in Financial Institutions in Ghana. Accounting Research Journal, 32(3), 436-453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/arj-07-2017-0114.
Handbook of International Quality Control, Auditing, Review, Other Assurance and Related Services Pronouncements (2016-2017 Edition), I. Avaible at: https://www.apu.net.ua/1151-miznarodni-standarti-kontrolu-yakosti-2016-2017. Access: 18 November 2020.
Ken H. Guo (2016). The Institutionalization of Commercialism in the Accounting Profession: An Identity-Experimentation Perspective. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 35(3), 99-117. Avaible at: https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51337. Access: 11 November 2020.
Khorunzhak, N., Belova, I., Zavytii, O., Tomchuk, V., & Fabiianska, V. (2020). Quality Control of Auditing: Ukrainian Prospect. Independent Journal of Management & Production, 11(8), 712-726. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v11i8.1229.
Khorunzhak, N., Brukhanskyi, R., & Ivanyshyn, V. (2019). Logic-statistical information models in control function of accounting. Independent Journal of Management & Production, 10(7), 846-871. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v10i7.906.
Melnyk, N., Trachova, D., Kolesnikova, O., Demchuk, O., & Golub, N. (2020). Accounting Trends in the Modern World. Independent Journal of Management & Production, 11(9), 2403-2416. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v11i9.1430.
Mouna, H., & Malsch, B. (2019) Navigating Through the Spatial and Institutional Contradictions of Public Audit Oversight. European Accounting Review, 1, 22. Online publication date: 8-Nov-2019. Avaible at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080-/09638180.2019.1683461?journalCode=rear20. Access: 14 November 2020.
Rodrigues, P. C. C. & Semenyshena, N. (2019). Editorial Introduction. Independent Journal of Management & Production, 10(7), 911-914. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v10i7.775.
Rodrigues, P. C. C., & Semenyshena, N. (2020). Special Edition (Integration System of Education, Science and Production) Introduction. Independent Journal of Management & Production, 11(8), 801-806. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v10i7.775
Rodrigues, P. C. C., Simanaviciene, Z., & Semenyshena, N. (2020). Editorial Volume 11, Issue 9. Independent Journal of Management & Production, 11(9), 2542-2547. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14807/ ijmp.v11i9.1424.
Semenyshena, N., Khorunzhak, N., & Zadorozhnyi, Z.-M. (2020). The Institutionalization of Accounting: the Impact of National Standards on the Development of Economies. Independent Journal of Management & Production, 11(8), 695-711. DOI: dx.doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v11i8.1228.
Semenyshena, N., Sysiuk, S., Shevchuk, K., Petruk, I., & Benko, I. (2020) Institutionalism in Accounting: a Requirement of the Times or a Mechanism of Social Pressure? Independent Journal of Management & Production, 11(9), 2516-2541. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v11i9.1440.
Siti-Nabiha, A. K., & Scapens, R. W. (2005). Stability and change: an institutionalist study of management accounting change. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 18(1), 44-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570510584656.
Slobodyanik, Y., Kondriuk, L., & Haibura, Y. (2019). The Strategy of Institutional Reform of the Supreme Audit Institution: the Case of Ukraine. Independent Journal of Management & Production, 10(7), 872-896. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v10i7.916.
Stephenson, P. (2016). Starting from scratch? Analysing early institutionalization processes: the case of audit governance. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(10), 1481-1501. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1110193. Access: 12 November 2020.