The relationship between additive manufacturing and circular economy: a sistematic review
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Downloads
Article Details
1. Proposal of Policy for Free Access Periodics
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in an institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
Proposal of Policy for Periodic that offer Postponed Free Access
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 [SPECIFY TIME HERE] after the publication, allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
d. They allow some kind of open dissemination. Authors can disseminate their articles in open access, but with specific conditions imposed by the editor that are related to:
Version of the article that can be deposited in the repository:
Pre-print: before being reviewed by pairs.
Post-print: once reviewed by pairs, which can be:
The version of the author that has been accepted for publication.
The editor's version, that is, the article published in the magazine.
At which point the article can be made accessible in an open manner: before it is published in the magazine, immediately afterwards or if a period of seizure is required, which can range from six months to several years.
Where to leave open: on the author's personal web page, only departmental websites, the repository of the institution, the file of the research funding agency, among others.
References
ANDERSEN, M. S. (2007) An introductory note on the environmental economics of the circular economy, Sustainability Science, v. 2, n. 1, p. 133-140.
ANTELMAN, K. (2004) Do open-access articles have a greater research impact? College & research libraries, v. 65, n. 5, p. 372-382.
ASTM. Standard Terminology for Additive Manufacturing Technologies (2013) [s.l.] American Society for Testing and Materials – ASTM.
BADGER, D.; NURSTEN, J.; WILLIAMS, P.; WOODWARD, D. (2000) Should all literature reviews be systematic? Evaluation & Research in Education, v. 14, n. 3-4, p. 220-230.
BANDYOPADDHYAY, A.; GUALTIERI T. P.; BOSE S. (2015) Global engineering and additive manufacturing, Additive Manufacturing, v. 1, p. 9-11.
BIOLCHINI, J.; MIAN, P. G.; NATALI A. C. C.; TRAVASSOS G. H. (2005) Systematic review in software engineering. System Engineering and Computer Science Department COPPE/UFRJ, Technical Report ES, v. 679, n. 05, p. 45.
BORNMAN, L. (2010) Towards an ideal method of measuring research performance: Some comments to the Opthof and Leydesdorff, Journal of Informetrics, v. 3, n. 4, p. 441-443.
BOURELL, D. L.; ROSEN, D. W.; LEU, M. C. (2014) The roadmap for additive manufacturing and its impact, 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing, v. 1, n. 1, p. 6-9.
BUER, S.; STRANDHAGEN; JAN, O.; CHAN, F. T. S. (2018) The link between Industry 4.0 and lean manufacturing: mapping current research and establishing a research agenda, International Journal of Production Research, v. 56, n. 8, p. 2924-2940.
CERDAS, F.; JURASCHEK, S.; THIEDE, C.; HERRMAN, C. (2017) Life cycle assessment of 3D printed products in a distributed manufacturing system, Journal of Industrial Ecology, v. 21, n. S1, p. S80-S93, doi: 10.1111/jiec.12618
COOPER, H. M. (1998) Synthesizing research: A guide for literature reviews. Sage.
DESPEISSE, M.; BAUMERS, M.; BROWN, P.; CHARNLEY, F.; FORD, S.; GARMULEWICZ A.; KNOWLES, S.; MINSHALL, T. H. W.; MORTARA, L.; REED-TSOCHAS, F. P.; ROWLEY, J. (2017) Unlocking value for a circular economy through 3D printing: A research agenda, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 115, p. 75-84, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.09.021
DURIAU, V. J.; REGER, R. K.; PFARRER, M. D. (2007) A content analysis of the content analysis literature in organization studies: Research themes, data sources, and methodological refinements, Organizational research methods, v. 10, n. 1, p. 5-34.
EVANS, S.; GREGORY, M.; RYAN, C.; BERGENDAHL, M. N.; TAN, A. (2009) Towards a sustainable industrial system: With recommendations for education, research, industry and policy, University of Cambridge, Institute for Manufacturing.
FORD, S.; DESPEISSE, M. (2016) Additive manufacturing and sustainability: an exploratory study of the advantages and challenges, Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 137, p. 1573-1587.
GARMULEWICZ, A.; HOLWEG, M.; VELDHUIS, H.; YANG, A. (2018) Disruptive technology as an enabler of the circular economy: what potential does 3D printing hold?, California Management Review, v. 60, n. 3, p. 112-132.
GHISELLINI, P.; CIALANI, C.; ULGIATI, S. (2016) A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems, Journal of Cleaner production, v. 114, p. 11-32.
GRESS, D. R.; KALAFSKY, R. V. (2015) Geographies of production in 3D: Theoretical and research implications stemming from additive manufacturing, Geoforum, v. 60, p. 43-52.
HOLWEG, M. (2015) The limits of 3-D printing, Harvard Business Review.
JABBOUR, A. B. L. S.; JABBOUR, C. J. C.; GODINHO FILHO, M.; ROUBAUD, D. (2018) Industry 4.0 and the circular economy: a proposed research agenda and original roadmap for sustainable operations, Annals of Operations Research, v. 270, n. 1-2, p. 273-286, doi: 10.1007/s10479-018-2772-8.
KANG, H. S.; LEE, J. Y.; CHOI, S.; KIM, H.; PARK, J. H.; SON J. Y.; KIM, B. H.; DO NOH, S. (2016) Smart manufacturing: Past research, present findings, and future directions, International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, v. 3, n. 1, p. 111-128, doi: 10.1007/s40684-016-0015-5
KIETZMANN, J.; PITT, L.; BERTHON, P. (2015) Disruptions, decisions, and destinations: Enter the age of 3-D printing and additive manufacturing, Business Horizons, v. 58, n. 2, p. 209-215.
KRIPPENDORFF, K. (2018) Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology, Sage publications.
LASI, H.; FETTKE, P.; KEMPER, H. G; FELD, T.; HOFFMANN M. (2014) Industry 4.0. Business & information systems engineering, v. 6, n. 4, p. 239-242.
LOY, J.; TATHAM, P. (2016) Redesigning production systems, In: Handbook of Sustainability in Additive Manufacturing, Springer, Singapore. p. 145-168.
MACARTHUR, E. (2013) Towards the circular economy, Journal of Industrial Ecology, v. 2, p. 23-44.
MATHEUS, J. A.; TAN, H. (2011) Progress toward a circular economy in China: The drivers (and inhibitors) of eco‐industrial initiative, Journal of industrial ecology, v. 15, n. 3, p. 435-457.
MOHER, D.; LIBERATI, A.; TETZLAFF, J.; ALTMAN, D. G. (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement, Annals of internal medicine, v. 151, n. 4, p. 264-269.
NUMAN, H. J.; SARLIN, P. (2014) From bits to atoms: 3D printing in the context of supply chain strategies, In: 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE. p. 4190-4199.
PAGANI, R. N.; KOVALESKI, J. L.; RESENDE, L. M. (2015) Methodi Ordinatio: a proposed methodology to select and rank relevant scientific papers encompassing the impact factor, number of citation, and year of publication, Scientometrics, v. 105, n. 3, p. 2109-2135.
PENG, T.; KELLENS, K; TANG, R.; CHEN, C.; CHEN, G. (2018) Sustainability of additive manufacturing: An overview on its energy demand and environmental impact. Additive Manufacturing, v. 21, p. 694-704.
PETROVIC, V.; GONZALEZ, A. H. J.; FORDÁ, F. O.; GORDILLO, J.; PUSHADES, J.; GRIÑAN L. (2011) Additive layered manufacturing: sectors of industrial application shown through case studies, International Journal of Production Research, v. 49, n. 4, p. 1061-1079.
REJESKI, D.; ZHAO, F.; HUANG, Y. (2018) Research needs and recommendations on environmental implications of additive manufacturing, Additive Manufacturing, v. 19, p. 21-28.
RUFFO, M.; TUCK, C.; HAGUE, R. (2006) Cost estimation for rapid manufacturing-laser sintering production for low to medium volumes, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, v. 220, n. 9, p. 1417-1427.
SAUERWEIN, M.; DOUBROVSKI, E.; BALKENENDE, R.; BAKKER, C. (2019) Exploring the potential of additive manufacturing for product design in a circular economy, Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 226, p. 1138-1149.
SHIPP, S. S.; GUPTA, N.; LAL, B.; SCOTT, J. A.; WEBER, C. L.; FINNIN, M. S.; BLAKE, M.; NEWSOME, S.; THOMAS, S. (2012 ) Emerging global trends in advanced manufacturing. Institute For Defense Analyses Alexandria Va. FFRDC: Science and Technology Policy Institute. IDA document: P-4603.
SHROUF, F.; ORDIERES, J.; MIRAGLIOTTA, G. (2014) Smart factories in Industry 4.0: A review of the concept and of energy management approached in production based on the Internet of Things paradigm, In: 2014 IEEE international conference on industrial engineering and engineering management. IEEE, p. 697-701.
SIN, M. L. (2016) Achieving ship's mission flexibility through designing, printing and operating unmanned systems with additive manufacturing and delayed differentiation, Tese de Doutorado. Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School.
TRANFIELD, D.; DENYER, D.; SMART, P. (2003) Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British journal of management, v. 14, n. 3, p. 207-222.
UNRUH, G. (2018) Circular economy, 3D printing, and the biosphere rules. California Management Review, v. 60, n. 3, p. 95-111.
VINKLER, P. (2012) The case of scientometricians with the “absolute relative” impact indicator. Journal of Informetrics, v. 6, n. 2, p. 254-264.
YANG, S.; MIN, W.; GHIBAUDO, J.; ZHAO, Y. F. (2019) Understanding the sustainability potential of part consolidation design supported by additive manufacturing, Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 232, p.722-738.
YUAN, Z.; BI, J.; MORIGUICHI, Y. (2006) The circular economy: A new development strategy in China, Journal of Industrial Ecology, v. 10, n. 1‐2, p. 4-8.
ZHAI, Y.; LADOS, D. A.; LAGOY, J. L. (2014) Additive manufacturing: making imagination the major limitation, Journal of Management, v. 66, n. 5, p. 808-816