The relationship between online convenience, online customer satisfaction, buying intention and electronic word-of-mouth
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. Proposal of Policy for Free Access Periodics
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in an institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
Proposal of Policy for Periodic that offer Postponed Free Access
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 [SPECIFY TIME HERE] after the publication, allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
d. They allow some kind of open dissemination. Authors can disseminate their articles in open access, but with specific conditions imposed by the editor that are related to:
Version of the article that can be deposited in the repository:
Pre-print: before being reviewed by pairs.
Post-print: once reviewed by pairs, which can be:
The version of the author that has been accepted for publication.
The editor's version, that is, the article published in the magazine.
At which point the article can be made accessible in an open manner: before it is published in the magazine, immediately afterwards or if a period of seizure is required, which can range from six months to several years.
Where to leave open: on the author's personal web page, only departmental websites, the repository of the institution, the file of the research funding agency, among others.
References
AJZEN I.; FISHBEIN M. (1975) Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to theory and research, Addition-Wesley, Reading, MA.
AJZEN, I. (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, v. 50 n. 2, p. 179-211.
ALBA, J.; LYNCH, J.; WEITZ, B.; JANISZEWSKI, C.; LUTZ, R.; SAWYER, A.; WOOD, S. (1997) Interactive home shopping: consumer, retailer, and manufacturer incentives to participate in electronic Marketplaces. Journal of Marketing, v. 61, n. 3, p. 38–53.
BEAUCHAMP, M. B.; PONDER, N. (2010) Perceptions of retail convenience for in-store and online shoppers, The Marketing Management Journal, v. 20, n. 1, p. 49-65.
BERRY, L. L.; SEIDERS, K.; GREWAL, D. (2002) Understanding Service Convenience. Journal of Marketing, v. 66, p. 1-17.
BHATNAGAR, A.; MISRA, S.; RAO, H. R. (2000) On Risk, Convenience, and Internet Shopping Behavior. Communications of the ACM, v. 43, p. 98-105.
CHATTERJEE, P. (2001) Online Reviews: Do Consumers Use Them? Advances in Consumer Research, v. 28, n. 1, p. 129-133.
CHAYAPA, K.; CHENG, L. W. (2011) Online Shopper Behavior: Influence of Online Shopping Decision. Asian Journal of Business Research, v. 1, p. 5-6.
CHEN, Y.; XIE, J. (2008) Online Consumer Review: Word-of-Mouth as a New Element of Marketing Communication Mix. Management Science, v. 54, n. 3, p. 477–491.
DAVIS, F. D.; BOGOZZI, R. P.; WARSHAW, P. R. (1989) User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, v. 35, p. 982-1003.
DAVIS, F. D. (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, v. 13, p. 39-319.
DE KERVILER, G.; DEMOULIN, N. T. M.; ZIDDA, P. (2016) Adoption of in-store mobile payment: Are perceived risk and convenience the only drivers? Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, v. 31, p. 334–344
DUARTE, P.; COSTA E SILVA, S.; FERREIRA, M. B. (2018) How convenient is it? Delivering online shopping convenience to enhance customer satisfaction and encourage e-WOM. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, n. 44, p. 161–169.
ENGEL, J. F.; BLACKWELL, R. D.; KEGERREIS R. J. (1969) How information is used to adopt an innovation. Journal of advertising research, v. 9, n. 4, p. 3-8.
FORSYTHE, S.; LIU, C.; SHANNON, D.; GARDNER, L. C. (2006) Development of a scale to measure the perceived benefits and risks of online shopping. Journal of Interactive Marketing, v. 20, n. 2, p. 55–75.
GOYETTE, I.; RICARD, L.; BERGERON, J.; MARTICOTTE, F. (2010) E-WOM Scale: word-of-mouth measurement scale for e-services context. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, v. 27, n. 1, p. 5–23.
GRUEN, T. W.; OSMONBEKOV, T. D.; CZAPLEWSKI, A. J. (2006) eWOM: The impact of customer-to-customer online know-how exchange on customer value and loyalty. Journal of Business Research, v. 59, n. 4, p. 449-456.
HAIR, F. J.; BACK, C. W.; BABIN, J. B.; ANDERSON, E. R. (2014) Multivariate Data Analysis, London, Pearson.
HENNIG-THURAU, T.; GWINNER, K. P.; WALSH, G.; GREMLER, D. D. (2004) Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet? Journal of Interactive Marketing, v. 18, n. 1, p. 38–52.
JAVADI, M. H. M.; DOLATABADI, H. R.; NOURBAKHSH, M.; POURSAEEDI, A.; ASADOLLAHI, A. R. (2012) An analysis of factors affecting on Online shopping behavior of consumers. International Journal of Marketing Studies, v. 4, n. 5, p. 81–98.
JAYAWARDHENA, C.; WRIGHT, L. T.; DENNIS, C. (2007) Consumers online: Intentions, orientations and segmentation. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, v. 35, n. 6, p. 515-599.
JIANG, L.; YANG, Z.; JUN, M. (2013) Measuring consumer perceptions of online shopping convenience, Journal of Service Management, v. 24, n. 2, p. 191-214.
JUN, M.; YANG, Z.; KIM, D. (2004) Customers’ perceptions of online retailing service quality and their satisfaction. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, v. 21, n. 8, p. 817–840.
KATZ, E.; LAZARSFELD, P. F. (1955) Personal influence: the part played by people in the flow of mass communications. Free Press.
KING, S. F.; LIOU, J.-S. (2004) A framework for internet channel evaluation. International Journal of Information Management, v. 24, n. 6, p. 473–488.
KUMAR, A.; KASHYAP, A. K. (2018) Leveraging utilitarian perspective of online shopping to motivate online shoppers. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, v. 46, n. 3, p. 247–263.
LAW, R.; HSU, C. H. C. (2006) Importance of hotel website dimensions and attributes: perceptions of online browsers and online purchasers. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research, v. 30, n. 3, p. 295-312.
LE-HOANG, V. P. (2020) The effects of electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) on the adoption of eWOM information. Independent Journal of Management and Production, v. 11, n. 6.
LE-HOANG, V. P.; NGUYEN, Q. B.; LUU, X. D.; HO, T. V.; PHAN, T. N. (2019) Factors affecting online buying intention: The case of tiki.vn. Pacific Business Review International, v. 12, n. 4, p. 45-57.
LEE, J.; PARK, D.-H.; HAN, I. (2008) The effect of negative online consumer reviews on product attitude: An information processing view. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, v. 7, n. 3, p. 341–352.
LI, N.; ZHANG, P. (2002) Consumer online shopping attitudes and behavior: an assessment of research. Proceedings of 8th Americas Conference on Information System, p. 508-517.
LUEDI, A. (1997) Personalize or Perish. Electronic Markets, v. 7, n. 3, p. 22–25.
MADU, C. N.; MADU, A. A. (2002) Dimensions of e‐quality. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, v. 19, n. 3, p. 246–258.
MEIXIAN, L. (2015) Convenience and Online Consumer Shopping Behavior: A Business Anthropological Case Study Based on the Contingent Valuation Method. The Anthropologist, v. 21, n. 1-2, p. 8–17.
NUNNALLY, C.; BERNSTEIN, I. H. (1994) Psychometric theory, New York, McGraw-Hill Company.
PARK, C.; LEE, T. M. (2009) Information Direction, Website Reputation and eWOM Effect: A Moderating Role of Product Type. Journal of Business Research, v. 62, p. 61-67
PARK, C.; WANG, Y.; YAO, Y.; KANG, Y. R. (2011) Factors Influencing eWOM Effects: Using Experience, Credibility, and Susceptibility. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, v. 1, n. 1, p. 74-79.
PARK, D.-H.; KIM, S. (2008) The effects of consumer knowledge on message processing of electronic word-of-mouth via online consumer reviews. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, v. 7, n. 4, p. 399–410.
ROHM, A. J.; SWAMINATHAN, V. (2004) A typology of online shoppers based on shopping motivations. Journal of Business Research, v. 57, n. 7, p. 748–757.
SEIDERS, K.; BERRY, L. L.; GRESHAM, L. G. (2000) Attention, Retailers! How convenient is your convenience strategy? Sloan Management Review, v. 41, p. 79-90.
SEIDERS, K.; VOSS, G. B.; GODFREY, A. L.; GREWAL, D. (2007) SERVCON: development and validation of a multidimensional service convenience scale. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, v. 35, n. 1, p. 144–156.
SINHA, J.; KIM, J.(2012) Factors affecting Indian consumers' online buying behavior. Innovative Marketing, v. 8, n. 2, p. 46-57.
TSAI, Y.; WU, S.-W. (2011) Using internal marketing to improve organizational commitment and service quality. Journal of Advanced Nursing, v. 67, n. 12, p. 2593–2604.
WOLFINBARGER, M.; GILLY, M. C.; (2001) Shopping online for freedom, control, and fun. California Management Review, v. 43, n. 2, p. 34–55.
ZEITHAML, V. A.; BERRY, L. L.; PARASURAMAN, A. (1996) The Behavioral Consequences of Service Quality. Journal of Marketing, v. 60, n. 2, p. 31.