Critical success factors in science and technology parks: a bibliographic review and analysis
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
صندلی اداریAbstract
Science and Technology Parks (STPs) are of great importance in the business context of the region in which they carry out their activity. They are one of the main mechanisms of public and private initiatives for the promotion of research, development and innovation and transfer of technology. The main purpose of this type of institution is not a purely economic but also sociocultural benefit, which makes them an adequate investment from the point of view of public institutions. They promote the creation of companies and agreements with universities and research centers, generate jobs and attract technology-based companies. Therefore, they require a detailed assessment to understand their operation and generate action plans and models that new parks or those that are still in the early stages of growth may follow. Thus, this study focuses on identifying the main Critical Success Factors (CSFs) for STPs from a literature review and evaluating the importance of the main variables that appear in the literature on the advancement of STPs to group them according to its operational characteristics.
Downloads
Article Details
1. Proposal of Policy for Free Access Periodics
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in an institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
Proposal of Policy for Periodic that offer Postponed Free Access
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 [SPECIFY TIME HERE] after the publication, allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
d. They allow some kind of open dissemination. Authors can disseminate their articles in open access, but with specific conditions imposed by the editor that are related to:
Version of the article that can be deposited in the repository:
Pre-print: before being reviewed by pairs.
Post-print: once reviewed by pairs, which can be:
The version of the author that has been accepted for publication.
The editor's version, that is, the article published in the magazine.
At which point the article can be made accessible in an open manner: before it is published in the magazine, immediately afterwards or if a period of seizure is required, which can range from six months to several years.
Where to leave open: on the author's personal web page, only departmental websites, the repository of the institution, the file of the research funding agency, among others.
References
ALBAHARI, A. et al. (2017) Technology Parks versus Science Parks: Does the university make the difference?. Technological Forecasting And Social Change, n. 116, p. 13-28.
BERSSANETI, F. T.; CARVALHO, M. M. (2015) Identification of variables that impact project success in Brazilian companies. International Journal Of Project Management, v. 33, n. 3, p. 638-649.
BIGLIARDI, B.; DORMIO, A. I.; NOSELLA, A.; PETRONI, G. (2006) Assessing science parks’ performances: directions from selected Italian case studies. Technovation, v. 26, n. 4, p. 489–505.
BORNER, K.; SANYAL, S.; VESPIGNAN, A. (2007) Network science. In: Cronin, B. (Ed.) Annual Review of Information Science & Technology. Medford: Information Today; American Society for Information Science and Technology, n. 41, p. 537-607.
CALDERA, A.; DEBANDE, O. (2010) Performance of Spanish universities in technology transfer: An empirical analysis. Research Policy, v. 39, n. 9, p. 1160-1173.
CHEN, C.; HUANG, C. (2004) A multiple criteria evaluation of high-tech industries for the science-based industrial park in Taiwan. Information and Management, v. 41, n. 7.
ČÍŽEK, P. (2015) The czech science park critical location factor analasis. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice, Series D: Faculty of Economics and Administration, v. 22, n. 33, p. 17-25.
COLLIS, J.; HUSSEY, R. (2005) Pesquisa em Administração: um guia prático para alunos de graduação e pós-graduação. 2. ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman.
COLAPINTO, C. (2011) The role of italian incubators and science parks in the triple-helix era. the hybrid model developed in lombardy. International Journal of Technoentrepreneurship, v. 2, n. 3-4, p. 290-303.
COMINS, N.; ROWE D. (2008) Success Factors for Science Parks in the Developed World and Emerging Economies. First published in the proceedings of the IASP Conference.
DAL, T. (2015) Análise de fatores críticos à implantação de Parques Científicos: um estudo de caso. Florianópolis, SC.
DHEWANTO, W. et al. (2016) The obstacles for science technology parks in a developing country, v. 8, n. 1.
DÍEZ-VIAL, I.; MONTORO-SÁNCHEZ, Á. (2016) How knowledge links with universities may foster innovation: The case of a science park. Technovation, n. 50, p. 41-52.
DRABROWASKA, J. (2011) Measuring the success of science parks: performance monitoring and evaluation. XXVIII IASP World Conference on Science and Technology Parks.
EUROPEAN COMMISION (2014) Setting up, managing and evaluating EU science and technology parks.
FAZLZADEH, A.; MOSHIRI, M. (2010) An Investigation of Innovation in Small Scale Industries Located in Science Parks of Iran. International Journal Of Business And Management, v. 5, n. 10, p. 148-154.
FERNANDES, S. C. R. (2014) Avaliação de Parques Tecnológicos: uma proposta de modelo para parques da 3ª geração. Tese (Mestrado em Administração) – Instituto COPPEAD de Administração, UFRJ.
FIKIRKOCA, A.; SARITAS, O. (2012) Foresight for science parks: The case of Ankara University. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, v. 24, n. 10, p. 1071-1085.
FUKUGAWA, N. (2013) Heterogeneity among science parks with incubators as intermediaries of research collaborations between startups and universities in Japan. International Journal Of Technology Transfer And Commercialisation, v. 12, n. 4, p. 231-262.
GIUGLIANI, E. (2011) Modelo de governança para PCTs no Brasil. Tese (Doutorado em Engenharia e Gestão do Conhecimento) – Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia e Gestão do Conhecimento, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis.
GUADIX, J.; CARRILLO-CASTRILLO, J.; ONIEVA, L.; NAVASCUÉS, J. (2016) Success variables in science and technology parks. Journal of Business Research, v. 69, n. 11, p. 4870-4875.
HANSSON, F. (2005) Science parks as knowledge organizations The ‘bad‘ in action? European Journal of Innovation Management, v. 10, n. 3, p. 1039-1040.
HU, T. S.; LIN, C. Y.; CHANG, S. L. (2005) Technology-based regional development strategies and the emergence of technological communities: a case study of HSIP, Taiwan. Technovation, v. 25, n. 4, p. 367-380.
HWANG, B. G.; ZHU, L. T.; JOANNE, S. H. (2017) Identifying Critical Success Factors for Green Business Parks: Case Study of Singapore. Journal Of Management In Engineering, v. 33, n. 5, p. 1-13.
KAZEMI, M.; ZAFAR ALLAHYARI, M. (2010) Defining a knowledge management conceptual model by using MADM. Journal of Knowledge Management, v. 4, n. 6, p. 872-890.
KESHTEGAR, A.; RAHIMI, S. F. (2015) Identification of crucial success factors of new product development in small and medium businesses located in southern khorasan technology and science park. International Journal of Economic Research, v. 12, n. 4, p. 861-869.
KHARABSHEH, R.; MAGABLEH, I. (2010) Obstacles of success of technology parks: The case of jordan. Proceedings of the European Conference on Knowledge Management, ECKM, p. 546-553.
KHARABSHEH, RADWAN. (2012) Critical Success Factors of Technology Parks in Australia. International Journal Of Economics And Finance, v. 4, n. 7, p. 57-66.
LENDNER, C.; DOWLING, M. (2007) The organisational structure of university business incubators and their impact on the success of start-ups: An international study. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, v. 7, n. 6, p. 541-555.
LI, Y. et al. (2016) Using web mining to explore Triple Helix influences on growth in small and mid-size firms. Technovation.
LIN, C. Y. (1997) Technopolis development: An assessment of the hsinchu experience. International Planning Studies, v. 2, n. 2, p. 257-272.
LINK, A. N.; SCOTT, J. T. (2007) The economics of university research parks. Oxford Revier of Economic Policy, v. 23, n. 4.
LÖFSTEN, H.; LINDELÖF, P. (2002) Science parks and the growth of new technology-based firms - academic-industry links, innovation and markets. Research Policy, v. 31, n. 6, p. 859–876.
MARASCO, A. (2008) Third-party logistics: a literature review. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 113, n. 1, p. 127-147.
MINGUILLO, D.; TIJSSEN, R.; THELWALL, M. (2014) Do science parks promote research and technology? A scientometric analysis of the UK. Scientometrics, v. 102, n. 1, p. 701-725.
RATINHO, T.; HENRIQUES, E. (2010) The role of science parks and business incubators in converging countries: Evidence from Portugal. Technovation, v. 30, n. 4, p. 278-290.
ŞIMŞEK, K.; YILDIRIM, N. (2016) Constraints to Open Innovation in Science and Technology Parks. Procedia - Social And Behavioral Sciences, n. 235, p. 719-728
SOENARSO, W. S.; NUGRAHA, D.; LISTYANINGRUM, E. (2013) Development of Science and Technology Park (STP) in Indonesia to Support Innovation-Based Regional Economy. Concept and Early Stage Development.
TALIB, M. S. A.; HAMID, A. B. A.; ZULFAKAR, M. H. (2015) Halal supply chain critical success factors: a literature review. Journal Of Islamic Marketing, v. 6, n. 1, p. 44-71.
TSAI, C.; CHANG, H. (2016) Evaluation of critical factors for the regional innovation system within the HsinChu science-based park. Kybernetes, v. 45, n. 4, p. 699-716.
VÁSQUEZ-URRIAGO, A.; BARGE-GIL, A.; MODREGO, A.; PARASKEVOPOULOU, E. (2014) The Impact of Science and Technology Parks on Firms´ ProductInnovation: Empirical Evidence from Spain. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, v. 24, n. 1, p. 835–873.
VEDOVELLO, C. A. (2000) Aspectos relevantes de parques tecnológicos e incubadoras de empresas. Revista do Banco Nacional do Desenvolvimento, Rio de JANEIRO, v. 7, n. 14, P. 273-300.
WASIM, M. U. (2014) Factors for Science Park Planning. World Technopolis Review, v. 3, n. 2, p. 97-108.
ZHANG, Y. (2004) Critical factors for science park management: the North American and European experience. International Journal Of Entrepreneurship And Innovation Management, v. 4, n. 6, p. 575-586.
ZOUAIN, D. M.; PLONSKI, G. A. (2015) Science and Technology Parks: laboratories of innovation for urban development - an approach from Brazil. Triple Helix, v. 2, n. 1.