Rafael Alves
Esteves
Rio de Janeiro
State University, Brazil
E-mail: estevesambiental@gmail.com
Submission: 1/21/2019
Revision: 4/13/2019
Accept: 5/2/2019
ABSTRACT
The invertebrate group is not considered in
environmental studies. When they are remembered, the studies are vague,
superficial and do not give the due importance that the group has in the
ecosystem dynamics. This paper aimed at placing the terrestrial mollusks in the
discussion agenda of complex socio-ecological systems and analyzed the
interactions of these mollusks with the other components of the
socio-ecological subsystems. The analysis was based on the
theoretical-methodological framework proposed by Ostrom
and discussed how terrestrial mollusks have the potential to support actions
for decision-making in biodiversity conservation, public health and local
economy. The framework presented four subsystems categorized as ecological,
political, social and economic, with the Sooretama
Biological Reserve in the Northern state of Espirito Santo as a geographical
boundary. The results allow us to perceive that terrestrial mollusks have
essential characteristics that reflect into ecosystem health, acting in an
integrated way with the dynamics of environmental services and the equilibrium
of habitats.
Keywords: land snails; bioindicator; Sooretama Biological Reserve; mollusks as socio-ecological indicator; vectors; ecosystem management.
1.
INTRODUCTION
The socio-ecological system approach
studies the relationship between ecosystems and society through three channels
(COLLINS et al., 2011; BODIN; TENGÖ,
2012). First, it analyses the incidence of ecosystems in the satisfaction of
human needs through the services provided by the former. Second, it studies how
the social dynamics of demand and catchment of ecosystem services modify and
determine the ecological integrity of the ecosystems (BURKHARD et al., 2012).
In these two channels, the
consolidation of ecosystem services conceptual framework supports the
development of different research areas like identification, evaluation, mapping
and economic valuation of ecosystem services (CONSTANZA et al.,1997; Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005). These research
areas have provided useful tools for the design of policy instruments for
conservation, preservation and management of ecosystems at a regional level
(BERROUET et al., 2018).
The third channel addresses the way
in which both social and ecological systems respond to endogenous and exogenous
drivers of change (BIER et al., 2008;
COLLINS et al., 2011; BURKHAND et al., 2012; VAN OUDENHOVEN et al., 2012).
Land snails have an important role
in the ecology of the forest floor by providing food for different species,
including invertebrates (FREST; JOHANNES, 1995; MARTIN, 2000; NYFFELER;
SYMONDSON, 2001), amphibians (DREWES, ROTH, 1981), foraging birds (SOUTH,
1980), snakes (MAIA-CARNEIRO et al.,
2012) and small mammals (RUDGE, 1968; WHITAKER; MUMFORD, 1972; CHURCHFIELD,
1984). Once shells of terrestrial mollusks are rich in calcium, they have an
important role in the storage, release and cycling of calcium in the ecosystems
they inhabit (CALDWELL, 1993).
Shells from terrestrial mollusks are
the primary source of calcium for eggs of some bird species, and declines in
mollusks abundance in some forest ecosystems have been related to defects in
eggshells, which tend to reduce the reproductive success and fall of some
birds’ species populations (GRAVELAN et
al., 1994; GRAVELAND; VAN DER WAL, 1996). They also participate as
intermediate hosts in the reproductive cycle for several parasitic helminths
that affect wild animals (RASKEVITZ et al.,
1999; BLL et al., 2001; LU et al., 2018).
Different species of terrestrial
mollusks have a status of indicators of environmental quality due to their
relatively lower dispersibility (SHIMEK, 1930), associated
with stable microclimate dependence, susceptibility to the decrease of moisture
(which can lead to desiccation) and by relatively strict habitat preferences,
resulting in high sensitivity to changes in environmental conditions (STRÖM,
2004; KAPPES, 2006; NOWAKOWASKA, 2011).
As they cannot escape quickly from
areas subjected to disturbances (STRAYER et
al., 1986; DOUGLAS et al., 2013),
the impact effects on terrestrial mollusks can be measured through the
richness, abundance and diversity in their habitats (HAWKINS, 1997). These
characteristics make terrestrial mollusks a good study model for measuring
quality parameters and environmental biodiversity (SANTOS; MONTEIRO, 2001;
DOUGLAS et al., 2013), and can also
subsidize management actions in environmental change assessment processes.
The socio-ecological system is an
important tool for monitoring and evaluating ecological and socio-economical
aspects of the complex systems and its progress to sustainability target
(HAIDER, et al., 2014). To understand
the operation of a socio-ecological system is necessary to comprehend their
parts and especially how these parts relate. Thus, under a complex
socio-ecological systems perspective, based on the framework proposed by Ostrom (2009), the present paper sought to analyze the socio-ecological interactions of the
terrestrial mollusks of the Sooretama
Biological Reserve, Atlantic Forest domain, and how these interactions can
drive actions for decision making in an ecosystem assessment.
2.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
The study area is part of the
largest Atlantic Rainforest remaining in the state of Espirito Santo, southeast
region of Brazil. The Sooretama Biological Reserve is
a natural area with dense biodiversity and a high rate of endemism, which
reinforces the need for studies on biodiversity. The region is characterized as
a dense ombrophilous forest with trees up to 40m in
height. The Reserve together other contiguous natural areas protect around
50,000 hectares of Atlantic Rainforest that contain a large biological
diversity still little known by science. In 1999 the UNESCO World Heritage
Committee included this unit in the list of areas of exceptional ecological
value for humanity, currently integrating the Atlantic Forest biosphere reserve.
The Reserve is located north of the
state and is surrounded by rural properties, whose agropastoral
activity moves the economic activity of that region. The scenario is marked by
extensive pasture areas for production of beef cattle and milk and cultivation
of such coffee, eucalyptus, pine, cacao and pineapple. The region is part of an
important road corridor that connects the Southeast with the Northeast region.
For this, the Governor Mario Covas Highway (BR-101)
crosses the 5 km extension of the Reserve, which causes a lot of impact on the
local fauna.
In the present paper,
socio-ecological systems are understood as systems that permeate interactions
between nature and humanity, with ecosystems and human societies interconnected
in a single network. The definition of Folke et al. (2010), the elements of this type
of system have reciprocal feedback and interdependence. For Ostrom
(2009), socio-ecological systems have multiple subsystems composed of internal
variables that interact at multiple levels.
To overcome the challenges created
by the Cartesian and linear method of disciplinary sciences which exclude the
social sciences from the ecological ones, thus creating simplistic theoretical
models, holders of ready and universal solutions to complex problems associated
with specific contexts, this analysis applies the framework proposed by
(OSTROM, 2009). The application of the framework consists of analyzing
four main subsystems: resource system, resource units, users and governance
systems; each of these subsystems being composed of several variables at
different levels. From the analysis of these subsystems and their components,
as well as the contexts (social, economic, political and ecological) in which
the socio-ecological system is inserted, it is possible to identify the
interactions and their results, contributing to a deeper understanding on the structure
and dynamics of the socio-ecological system (Figure 1).
Figure 1: The core subsystems in a framework
for analyzing social-ecological systems Source: Ostrom (2009).
3.
RESULTS AND DISCUSS
3.1.
The terrestrial mollusks from the
perspective of the socio-ecological systems
Practically
all the country’s natural regions require detailed studies on terrestrial
mollusk’s biodiversity. Faunal surveys, environmental impact studies and
related issues rarely considers mollusks faunal. Despite the importance of
terrestrial gastropods as indicators of environmental conditions (SANTOS;
MONTEIRO, 2001; DOUGLAS et al.,
2013), there are no systematized studies on the biology and ecology of these
organisms in Brazil, contrary to some other countries.
As
they are sensitive to changes in the structural and climatic parameters of the
habitat and therefore, good study models, the increase in the knowledge about
terrestrial mollusk communities, especially those inhabiting the leaf-litter,
may better subsidize conservation strategies and actions of forests and other
environments in which they occur. So far, the knowledge on the terrestrial
mollusk fauna in natural environments in Brazil is relatively low, with the
knowledge available being, in general, restricted to a few records of species
that were found in different locations.
Against
the lack the knowledge about terrestrial mollusks and their relationship with
the socio-ecological aspects and, considering an integrated malacology approach
to ecosystem analysis, the network interactions of terrestrial mollusks were
mapped (Figure 2).
Figure 2.
Terrestrial mollusks of Sooretama Biological Reserve
mapping of interactions in subsystems (ecological, social, political and
economic).
Applying
the key subsystems of the framework, the Shared Resource System (SR) is the use
of the Atlantic Forest, whose main Resource Unit (RU) is the terrestrial
mollusks. The Reserve acts as the main System of Governance (SG), managing the
resources to benefit the entire population of the municipality (U), based on the
way in which the terrestrial mollusks respond to the environmental impacts
within Reserve and how these answers can subsidize the decision making (I)
(Table 1).
Table 1. Some second-level variables under
first-level core subsystems (S, RS, GS, RU, U, I, R and ECO) in a framework for
analyzing social-ecological systems. The framework does not list variables in
an order of importance, because their importance varies in different studies.
Social, Economic and
Political Context (S)
S1 Economic development S2
Environmental laws S3 Agricultural
frontier S4 Biodiversity Policy S5 Water resource
Resource System (SR) SR1 Sector: Atlantic
Forest fragment SR2 System frontier SR3 Size of resource
system SR4 Phytophysiognomy type SR5 Primary
productivity SR6 Equilibrium
properties SR7 Microclimate SR8 Environmental impacts SR9 Land use SR10 Location Resource Unit (UR) UR1 Terrestrial
mollusks species UR2 Communities UR3 Spatial and
temporal distribution UR4 Leaf-litter
composition UR5 Climate
condition UR6 Ecosystem
services UR7 Interaction
among resource units UR8 Economic value UR9 Biodiversity UR10 Knowledge Interactions (I) I1 Natural bioindicators I2 Ecosystem
services I3 Environmental
health I4 Small farmers I5 Land use
conflicts I6 Biodiversity
conservation I7 Water crisis |
System of Governance (SG) SG1 Reserve
Management SG1.a Management plain SG1.b Deliberative Council SG1.c Scientific committee SG2 ICMBio SG3 Conservation
Policy SG4 State Government SG5 Federal
Government SG6 State
Concessionaire – BR-101 Users (U) U1 Surrounding
population U1.a Producers U1.b Residents U2 Fauna and flora U3 BR-101 users U4 Researchers U5 Location Results (R) R1 Environmental Performance R1.a Immediate responses R1.b Nutrient cycling R1.c Food providing R2 Social Performance R2.a Ecosystem
dynamic R2.b Ecological
balance R2.c Vectors R3 Economical Performance R3.a Agricultural
pests R3.b Medical and veterinary
interests R4 Political Use R4.a Make decision R4.b Species
conservation |
Related Ecosystems (ECO)
ECO1 Biodiversity ECO2 Habitat
dynamic ECO3 Environmental impacts ECO4 Atlantic Forest
3.2.
About the Contexts
For
the relationships of the socio-ecological system analyzed to make sense it is
necessary to understand the social, economic and political contexts in which
this system is involved. It is only through the mapping of the structuring
factors of the system from the context that it becomes possible to analyze in
detail the relations between aspects of interest.
The Sooretama Biological Reserve was created in 1941. It is the
oldest protected area of Espirito Santo state and is among the oldest in
Brazil. Its 27,858 hectares help preserve an important remaining area of
Atlantic Forest in the state.
The
basis of the economy of the northern region of the Espirito Santo state is agropastoral, and the municipality of Sooretama
is a major contributor of areas for cultivation and pasture. This economic
characteristic demonstrates the fragility in the process of protected area
management, due an explicit disharmonious relationship between economic
development (S1) of areas whose dominance activity is represented by agropastoral and the protection of preserved areas.
The strong pressure for the advance
of agricultural production areas (S3) is always a factor of extreme importance
in areas bordering on Conservation Units and constitutes an important piece for
the understanding of the socioecological system. The economic and political context are
provided in legislation by National System of Conservation Units (SNUC) (S2)
and contrasts in many ways with the National Biodiversity Policy (S4).
The SNUC was published in 2000 by
Federal Law 9,985 and categorizes and establishes the set of Conservation Units
with specific objectives for public management at the federal, state and
municipal levels. As the creation of the SNUC came long after the creation of
the Sooretama Biological Reserve, it is natural that
the socio-political context is troubled, since the new legislation, the
communication with the surrounding neighborhood became more fragile because,
according to category Biological Reserve is not allowed the permanence of
dwellings or activities that do not scientific research.
The
main threats currently faced by the Reserve are the presence of the Governador Mário Covas Highway (BR-101), the
hunting inside the Reserve, the construction of dams in the surrounding area to
irrigate the plantations, the use of fire by surrounding communities and the
use banned pesticides in the plantations on the edge of the Reserve. Such human
activities affect irreversibly the environmental integrity of the Reserve.
Regarding
the present socio-ecological system, specifically the relevant impacts on the
construction of dams for irrigation of plantations and for the animals for
consumption in the surroundings areas of the Reserve contribute a lot to
consolidate the local reality. Recently the state of Espirito Santo suffered
the greatest water crisis of the last 100 years and the use of water resources
(S5) is vital for the maintenance of the environmental health, social harmony
and economic situation of the region.
3.3.
Resources, Users and Governance
As already mentioned, terrestrial
mollusks (UR1) perform ecosystem services (UR6) of extreme importance for
environmental quality. They respond quickly to environmental stressors (SR8),
are dependent on stable microclimate (SR7) and favorable environmental
conditions (UR5), characteristics that give terrestrial mollusks good
environmental bioindicators.
The main idea
underlying this study is the possibility of using these characteristics of
terrestrial mollusks as a tool for public management of biodiversity
conservation (UR9), in an Atlantic Forest domain environment (SR1). In addition
to providing data that promote public health actions, since many species of
terrestrial mollusks are intermediate hosts of parasites (R2.c) that cause
diseases in humans, as well as actions in the economic sphere, since certain
terrestrial mollusks are agricultural pests (R3.a).
Knowledge about the bioecology of terrestrial mollusks (UR10) can explain much
about how the ecological dynamics in the Reserve (SR10) and, consequently,
around the Reserve (U1) interact and consolidate in the local context, favoring
the environment for the agricultural production, being a limiting
socio-environmental factor.
The Reserve has a phytophysiognomy characterized as a Board Forest (SR4), a
type of dense and flat ombrophilous forest with trees
of more than 30 meters in height. Having a tool that assists in environmental
diagnosis and subsidizes decision-makes (SG1) in biodiversity conservation
represents a great leap in the management of Conservation Units (SG3),
contributing to the Chico Mendes Institute of Biodiversity Conservation (ICMBio) - environmental department responsible for
protected areas - in the prioritization of areas requiring management actions
(SG2).
Thus, an integrated approach
considering the terrestrial mollusks as integrators of the interactions range
from the equilibrium of the primary productivity (SR5) produced in the forest
to the changes in the climatic conditions (UR5), passing by the composition of
the leaf-litter (UR4), a very important component for forest health. From the
integrations between the terrestrial mollusks and the other socio-ecological
components of the analyzed system, the interactions between resource units
(UR7) can be used by public managers, be it the Federal Government (SG5), the
State Government (SG4) and the direct users of the socio-ecological system,
such as the concessionaire that administers the BR-101 in the ES (SG6), which
crosses the Reserve, as well as users (U1), the researchers associated with the
Reserve (U4) and, inevitably, the components of local fauna and flora (U3),
integrating therefore the biophysical, social, economic and political
resources.
3.4.
Interactions and Results
The
authors Anderies et
al. (2004) provided many examples of complex interactions between the
components of a socio-ecological system around the world. According them, many
are farmer-organized irrigation systems, such as those of Bali (LANSING, 1991),
the zanjeros of the Philippines (SIY, 1982) and of
Spain (MAAS; ANDERSON, 1986). These are examples of long-lived,
socio-ecological systems with robust irrigation. Other examples come from
managed fisheries, forests, and dike systems.
Some
of these are long-lived and remain robust, e.g.,
the Dutch water boards (KAIJSER, 2002), the lobster fisheries in Maine
(ACHESON, 2003), or the Hatfield Forest (RACKHAM, 1988), but others were
long-lived and yet eventually collapsed, e.g.,
early Mesopotamian civilization, the lowland Mayas (TAINTER, 1988), Chacoan culture (MILLS, 2002), Mesa Verde (LIPE, 1995), the
northern cod fisheries (FINLAYSON; McCAY, 1998), and
the customary marine system of the Tonga (MALM, 2001).
The
framework proposed by Ostrom (2009) is useful in
providing a common set of potentially relevant variables and their
subcomponents to use in the design of data collection instruments, the conduct
of fieldwork, and the analysis of findings about the sustainability of complex
socio-ecological systems. It helps identify factors that may affect the
likelihood of particular policies enhancing sustainability in one type and size
of resource system and not in others.
In
this study, I analyzed the complex network of the terrestrial mollusks
socio-ecological system to understand how the interactions act as a tool for
ecosystem management (UR7). The terrestrial mollusks interact with
environmental, social and economic agents that might reflect useful instruments
for creation of public policies.
The
key aspect of the complex network of interactions of terrestrial mollusks in
the socio-ecological system of the Reserve is the condition of being good
natural bioindicators (I1). Mollusks, in general, are
indicators, not only of environmental quality, but are also social indicators.
The presence or absence of certain species of mollusks translates into a
socio-environmental condition that explains a history that may be natural or
anthropogenic.
In
the public health field (R3.b), different species of terrestrial mollusks can
act as intermediate host (R2.c) of two nematodes of medical importance, Angiostrongylus cantonensis (CHEN,
1935) and Angiostrongylus costaricensis
(MORERA; CÉSPEDES, 1971), etiological agents of eosinophilic
meningoencephalitis and abdominal angiostrongyliasis,
respectively, among others of medical and veterinary interest (THIENGO;
FERNANDEZ, 2010; COURA, 2013; RODRIGUES et
al., 2016).
The
presence of each species of terrestrial mollusk indicates its own reality in
the specific context of the system unit analyzed. The presence of natural
vectors of parasites of medical and veterinary interest reinforces the need for
a systemic approach, with actions of public health surveillance in the areas
where the mollusks were found. The context of the analyzed geographical area
(SR10), the Sooretama Biological Reserve is located
in a poorly developed municipality.
A
strictly rural area that presents favorable conditions for the proliferation of
populations of terrestrial mollusks. The rural area where the Reserve is
located favors the advance of the populations of terrestrial mollusks to the
plantations (R3.a). The plantations provide food for many species of
terrestrial mollusks, which have dense populations, causing economic damage to
farmers (I4).
Terrestrial
mollusks are sensitive to moisture and they have been responding very well to a
specific problem of the region, which is the water crisis (I7) in the state of
Espirito Santo. Too much use of water resources by rural properties around the
Reserve can drastically reduce populations of terrestrial mollusks. The
interaction between land snails with natural resources must be used in public
management. This response of mollusks means that the misuse of water resources
by the productive sector (SR8) is affecting the local biodiversity richness
(I6), not only in terrestrial mollusks biodiversity, but in all fauna and flora
groups (U2). However, the response of the water crisis (I7) is easily observed
through land snails due their bioindicator
characteristic.
The
set of interactions and results allow to evaluate the gears that move the
complex socio-ecological system analyzed. From the perspective of the
socio-ecological system of the terrestrial mollusks of the Sooretama
Biological Reserve, it is possible to verify that the presence or absence of
certain species of land snails can indicate the occurrence of environmental and
social impacts (SR8) that reflect the use and occupation of areas (SR9)
necessary for the understanding of public order problems. It is important to
note that the analysis of a particular socio-ecological system is unique to the
contexts associated with it. However, some similarities can be replicated to
socio-ecological systems of the same characteristics.
4.
CONCLUSIONS
In an environmental context, land
snails are good environmental bioindicators,
responding rapidly to microclimate changes and playing important ecosystem
services. Regarding public health, the occurrence of certain species of land
snails indicate risks to human and animal health due to the transmission of zoonoses. In economic activity, some species may be
agricultural pests, indicating the need for control actions and environmental
management to avoid economic losses.
However, we rarely observe this group
being considered in studies or environmental analyses. The experience of the Sooretama Biological Reserve case through the theoretical-methodological framework used in this analysis shows that
terrestrial mollusks have great potential in subsidizing measures and actions
of public management for ecosystem assessment and decision making for the
construction of environmental policies, municipal strategic health surveillance
guidelines and ecological approach for agricultural pests control.
5.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This study
was financed in part by the
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – Brasil (CAPES) – Finance Code 001.
REFERENCES
Acheson,
J. M. (2003) Capturing the commons: devising
institutions to manage the Maine lobster industry. University Press of New
England, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.
Anderies,
J. M.; Janssen, M. A.; Ostrom, E. (2004) A framework to analyze the robustness of social-ecological
systems from an institutional perspective. Ecology
and Society v. 9, n. 1, p. 18.
BERROUET, L. M.;
MACHADO, J.; VILLEGAS-PALACIO, C. (2018) Vulnerability of socio—ecological
systems: A conceptual Framework. Ecological
Indicators, v. 84, p. 632–647. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.07.051.
BODIN, O.; TENGÖ, M.
(2012) Disentangling intangible social-ecological systems. Global Environmental Change, n. 22, p. 430–439. DOI:
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.01.005.
BURKHARD, B.; KROLL,
F.; NEDKOV, S.; MÜLLER, F. (2012) Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and
budgets. Ecological Indicators, n. 21,
p. 17–29. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019.
Caldwell,
R. S. (1993)
Macroinvertebrates and their relationship to coarse woody debris: with special
reference to land snails. in: J. W.
MCMinn, D.A. Crossley (eds.) Biodiversity
and Coarse Woody Debris in Southern Forests. Proceedings of the workshop on
coarse woody debris in southern forests: effects on biodiversity. USDA Forest
Service General Technical Report SE-GTR-94.
Churchfield,
S. (1984) Dietary
separation in three species of shrew inhabiting water-cress beds. Journal of Zoology, n. 204, p. 211-228.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1984.tb02371.x.
COLLINS, S. L.;
CARPENTER, S. R.; SWINTON, S. M.; ORENSTEIN, D. E.; CHILDERS, D. L.; GRAGSON,
T. L.; GRIMM, N. B.; GROVE, J. M.; HARLAN, S. L.; KAYE, J. P.; KNAPP, A. K.; KOFINAS,
G. P.; MAGNUSON, J. J.; McDOWELL, W. H.; MELACK, J.
M.; OGDEN, L. A.; ROBERTSON, G. P.; SMITH, M. D.; WHITMER, A. C. (2011) An
integrated conceptual framework for long-term social-ecological research. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment,
n. 9, p. 351–357. DOI: 10.1890/100068.
CONSTANZA, R.; D’ARGE,
R.; DE GROOT, R.; FARBES, S.; GRASSO, M.; HANNON, B.; LIMBURG K.; NAEEM, S.;
O’NEILL, R. V.; PARUELO, J.; RASKIN, R. G.; SUTTON, P.; VAN DEN BELT, M. (1997)
The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, n. 387, p.
253–260. DOI: 10.1038/387253a0.
COURA, J. R. (2013) Dinâmica das
doenças infecciosas e parasitárias. In: Dinâmica
das doenças infecciosas e parasitárias. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan,
p. 131-140.
DOUGLAS, D. D.; BROW,
D. R.; PEDERSON, N. (2013) Land snail diversity can reflect degrees of
anthropogenic disturbance. Ecosphere,
v. 4, n. 2, p. 1-14.
Drewes,
R. C.; Roth, B. (1981)
Snail-eating frogs from the Ethiopian highlands: a new anuran specialization. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, v. 72, n. 3, p. 267-287. DOI:
10.1111/j.1096-3642.1981.tb01573.x.
FINLAYSON, A. C.;
MCCAY, B. (1998) Crossing the threshold of ecosystem resilience: the commercial
extinction of northern cod. In: F.
Berkes, C. Folke, and J. Colding, (Eds). Linking social and ecological systems:
management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience.
Cambridge University Press, New York, USA.
FOLKE,
C.; Carpenter, S. R.; Walker, B.; Scheffer, M.; Chapin, T.; Rockström, J. (2010) Resilience thinking:
integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecology and Society, v. 15, n. 4, p. 20.
FREST, T. J.; JOHANNES,
E. J. (1995) Interior Columbia Basin
mollusk species of special concern. Deixis
Consultants, Seattle, WA. 274 pp.
+ appendices.
Graveland,
J.; van der Wal, R.
(1996) Decline in snail abundance due to soil acidification causes eggshell
defects in forest passerines. Oecologia, n. 105, p. 351-360. DOI: 10.1007/BF00328738.
Graveland,
J.; van der Wal, R.; van Balen, J. H.; van Noordwijk, A. J. (1994) Poor reproduction in forest
passerines from decline of snail abundance on acidified soils. Nature, n. 368, p. 446-448. DOI:
10.1038/368446a0.
HAIDER, L. J.;
IRIBARREM, A.; GARDNER, T.; LATAWIECK, A. E.; ALVES-PINTO, H.; STRASSBUG, B.
(2014) Understanding Indicators And Monitoring For Sustainability In The
Context Of Complex Social-Ecological Systems. Sustainability Indicators in Practice, p. 271.
HAWKINS, J. W.;
LANKESTER, M. W.; LAUTENSCHLAGER, R. A.; BELL, F. W. (1997) Effects of
alternative conifer release treatments on terrestrial gastropods in
northwestern Ontario. The Forestry
Chronicle, n. 73, p. 91–98.
Kaijser,
A. (2002) System
building from below: institutional change in Dutch water control systems. Technology and Culture, v. 43, n. 3, p.
521-548.
KAPPES, H. (2006)
Relations between forest management and slug assemblages (Gastropoda)
of deciduous regrowth forests. Forest
Ecology and Management, n. 237, p. 450-457.
Lansing,
J. S. (1991) Priests and programmers: technologies of
power in the engineered landscape of Bali. Princeton University Press,
Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
LIPE, W. D. (1995) The
depopulation of the northern San Juan: conditions in the turbulent 1200s. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology,
v. 14, n. 2, p. 143-169.
Lu,
X. T.; Gu, Q. Y.; Limpanont, Y.; Song, L. G.; Wu, Z. D.; Okanurak, K.; Lv, Z. Y. (2018) Snail-borne parasitic
diseases: an update on global epidemiological distribution, transmission
interruption and control methods. Infectious
Diseases of Poverty, v. 7, p. 28. DOI: 10.1186/s40249-018-0414-7.
Maass,
A.; ANDERSON, R. L.
(1986) ... nd
the desert shall rejoice: conflict, growth, and justice in arid environments.
R. E. Krieger,
Malabar, Forida, USA.
Maia-Carneiro
T.; Dorigo T. A.; Gomes, S. R.; Santos, S. B.; Rocha C. F. D. (2012) Sibynomorphus neuwiedi (Ihering,
1911) (Serpentes; Dipsadidae) and
Potamojanuarius lamellatus (Semper, 1885) (Gastropoda; Veronicellidae): a trophic relationship revealed. Biotemas, v. 25, n. 1, p. 211-213. DOI:
10.5007/21757925.2012v25n1p211.
Malm,
T. (2001) The tragedy
of the commoners: the decline of the customary marine tenure system of Tonga. SPC Traditional Marine Resource Management
and Knowledge Information Bulletin, n. 13, p. 3-13.
Martin,
S. M. (2000)
Terrestrial snails and slugs (Mollusca: Gastropoda)
of Maine. Northeastern Naturalist,
v. 7, n. 1, p. 33-88. DOI: 10.2307/3858431.
MILLENNIUM ECOSYSTEM
ASSESSMENT. (2005) Ecosystems and Human
Well-being: Synthesis. Report.
MILLS, B. J. (2002)
Recent research on Chaco: changing views on economy, ritual, and society. Journal of Archaeological Research, v. 10,
n. 1, p. 65-117.
NowakoWAska,
A. (2011) Land snails
as bioindicators of environmental pollution: mini
review. In: Urban fauna: Studies of
animal biology, ecology and conservation in European cities. Indykiewicz, P., Jerzak, L., Böhner, J.,
Kavanagh, B. (eds.). UTP Bydgoszcz, 2011, p. 317-323.
Nyffeler,
M.; Symondson, W. O. P.
(2001) Spiders and harvestmen as gastropod predators. Ecological Entomology, n. 26, p. 617-628.
OSTROM, E. (2009) A
General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems. Science, v. 325, n. 5939, p. 419–422.
DOI: 10.1126/science.1172133.
Rackham, O. (1988) The last forest: the fascinating account of Britain’s most ancient
forest, ecology and institutions of the last remaining royal forest in England.
J.D. Dent, London, UK.
Raskevitz,
R. F.; Kocan, A. A.; Shaw, J. H. (1991) Gastropod availability and habitat utilization by wapiti and
white-tailed deer sympatric on range enzootic for meningeal worn. Journal of Wildlife Disease, v. 27, n. 1,
p. 92-101.
RODRIGUES P. S.;
FERNANDEZ, M. A; THIENGO, S. C.; SALGADO N. C.; GOMES, S. R. (2016) Terrestrial
molluscs associated to the invasive African snail Achatina fulica Bowdich, 1822 in urban areas of Rio de Janeiro State. Tentacle, The Newsletter of the
IUCN/SSC Mollusc Specialist Group, Hawaii, Ed.24.
Rudge,
M. R. (1968) The food
of the common shrew Sorex araneus L, (Insectivera: Soricidae) in
Britain. Journal of
Animal Ecology, n. 37, p. 565-581.
Santos,
S. B.; Monteiro, D. P. (2001)
Composição dos gastrópodes terrestres em duas áreas do Centro de Estudos
Ambientais e Desenvolvimento Sustentado (CEADS), Vila Dois Rios, Ilha Grande,
RJ, Brasil - um estudo piloto. Revista
Brasileira de Zoologia, n. 18, p. 181-190.
Shimek, B. (1930) Land snails
as indicators of ecological conditions. Ecology, v. 11,
n. 4, p. 673-686. DOI: 10.2307/1932328.
Siy,
R. Y. Jr. (1982) Community resource management: lessons from
the Zanjera. University of the Philippines Press,
Quezon City, Philippines.
South,
A. (1980) A technique
for the assessment of predation by birds and mammals on the slug Deroceras reticulatum
(Muller, 1774) (Pulmonata: Limacidae).
Journal of Conchology, n. 30, p. 229-234.
Strayer,
D.; Pletscher, D. H.; Hamburg, S. P; Nodvin, D. S. C. (1986) The effects of forest disturbance on
land gastropod communities in northern New England. Canadian Journal of Zoology, n. 64, p. 2094-2098.
Ström,
L. (2004) Long-term effects of riparian
clear-cutting- richer land snail communities in regenerating forests. M.S.
Thesis. Umeå, Sweden: Umeå
University. 23p.
Tainter,
J. A. (1988) The collapse of complex societies.
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
THIENGO, S. C.; FERNANDEZ, M. A.
(2010) O caramujo gigante africano Achatina fulica no Brasil. In: FISCHER, M. L.; COSTA, L. C. M. Achatina fulica: um
problema de saúde pública? Curitiba: Champagnat, p. 189-202.
VAN OUDENHOVEN, A. P.
E.; PETZ, K.; ALKEMADE, R.; HEIN, L.; DE GROOT, R. S. (2012) Framework for
systematic indicator selection to assess effects of land management on
ecosystem services. Ecological Indicator,
n. 21, p. 110–122. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.01.012.
Whitaker,
J. O.; Munford, R. E.
(1972) Food and ectoparasites of Indiana shrews. Journal of Mammalogy,
v. 53, n. 2, p. 329-335.