INNOVATION IN BRAZILIAN SMALL
COMPANIES
Tonny Kerley de Alencar Rodrigues
Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (Coppead), Brazil
E-mail: tonny.rodrigues@coppead.ufrj.br
Átila de Melo Lira
Universidade Paulista, Brazil
E-mail: atilalira@hotmail.com
Irenilza de Alencar Naas
Universidade Paulista, Brazil
E-mail: irenilza@gmail.com
Submission: 01/04/2014
Revision: 17/04/2014
Accept: 30/04/2014
ABSTRACT
This study aims to identify the interfaces
and boundaries of innovation orientation of Brazilian MSEs because, despite the
importance of innovation for Brazilian MSEs, a thorough analysis of such
initiatives in Brazil still has not actually happened. The search was developed
from a quantitative approach, of applied nature and descriptive. A structured questionnaire
was used where were interviewed 700 MSEs using a probabilistic sampling. The
study offers two important conclusions. The challenges for innovation can be
perceived along three dimensions: design innovation, the implementation of
innovation and functional area of innovation. And the data confirms that small
Brazilian companies generally have difficulties to sell their innovations.
Keywords:
innovation, small enterprises, patents.
Contributors
and Supporting Agencies: Capes,
CNPq and Associação Teresinense de Ensino.
1. INTRODUCTION
Companies
worldwide are looking to technological innovation as feasible for your market
expansion (BURNS; STALKER, 1961; NELSON, 1993) alternative. In Brazil, the
change and technological innovation are more than one alternative, is a
survival necessity. Technological innovation is not only important to the
prosperity of private enterprises, is also one of the key factors contributors
to economic growth. Brazil's economic growth and prosperity depend on how local
businesses are effective in marketing new technologies and innovations,
converting MSEs into viable enterprises with a sustainable competitive
advantage. Thus, the role of science and technology in promoting economic
growth has received increased attention from economists and policymakers in
recent years in Brazil (MARTINS, 2012).
Despite
the importance of innovation for Brazilian MSEs, a thorough analysis of such
initiatives in Brazil has not actually happened, so the need for a greater
understanding of innovation among Brazilian MSEs. Thus, this study aims to
identify the interfaces and boundaries of innovation orientation of Brazilian
MSEs. This research is important for at least three reasons: First, Brazil is
one of the economies with greater strength in emerging markets, and second, the
research seeks to provide a comprehensive assessment of the propensity for
innovation MSE Brazilian, such evaluation is expected to show the extent to
which the MSEs sector encompasses innovation, and third, the Brazilian government
needs to understand the dynamics of innovation MSEs in order to develop
effective policies for the sector.
The
structure of the article is as follows: the first section focuses on issues
related to the provision of basic information about the innovation of MSEs and
international comparative perspectives, the following section focuses on
methodological issues and describes the design of the research, in then
discusses the study results and the final section summarizes the main
concluding remarks.
1.1.
Innovation
in Brazilian MSEs
Historically,
there have been few incentives to encourage innovation in Brazil. The
intellectual protection did not work well and the innovations were considered
“social goods”. The task of innovation was centrally administered priority in
specific industrial sectors. Innovation cycles in these specific sectors
experienced political, social and economic crises, they did not try to
modernize, improve or innovate. Attempts to innovate in the industry included
the import of Western technology companies domestically and numerous research
institutes were created to cover different industrial sectors. The actual
throughput of these innovations in the economy was poor. The era of Brazilian
economic transformation did little to improve the activities related to
innovation. Fiscal constraints in Brazil put additional pressure on research
institutions and universities with public funding, while the new private sector
was concerned with the supply of basic goods and services for the local market
(CASSIOLATO; LASTRES, 1999).
Most
studies on innovation in Brazil in general, and of MSEs in particular, was
carried out by public institutions, including SEBRAEs (Brazilian Service of
Support for Micro and Small Enterprises), IBGE (Brazilian Institute of
Geography and Statistics), MCT (Ministry of Science and Technology) and the
INPI (National Institute of Industrial Property) or surveys worldwide by the
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) that have global data,
including Brazil. The findings of these studies are relatively consistent.
Firstly, investments in innovation in Brazil have been kept fixed. The
statistical INPI investment in machinery, equipment, land and buildings is
between 65 % and 85 % of all innovation expenditure declared in the last
decade. Expenditures for research and development are less than 10 % of this
amount (INPI, 2013).
The
value of these investments has declined in recent years. Private companies
confirm that the vast majority of them do not have a department focused on
research and development, knowledge transfer and innovation. Second, large
firms seem to be responsible for the investment in innovation in Brazil. They
have an advantage over smaller companies for about five times the production
companies and 10 times in service companies. Moreover, large firms also
introduce more products and services than smaller firms (MARTINS, 2012).
This
is in contrast with other Western countries, where innovations are
predominantly generated by small firms, as shown by the reports of global data
(WIPO, 2013). Brazilian MSEs prefer to invest in fixed assets, perhaps
believing that the purchase of new and modern equipment probably go help them
solve the deficit of innovation. They are less inclined to adopt traditional
methods of innovation, such as research and development, knowledge development,
procurement of goods and so on.
Thirdly,
Brazilian firms predominantly rely on their own resources to finance
innovation. Investments in innovation are funded from internally generated cash
flow (representing approximately 80 % of total funding for innovation) and bank
financing (about 15%). The roles of venture capital and public funding as
contributing to the financing of innovation in enterprises are negligible
(FERREIRA et al., 2013).
Fourth,
access to finance is seen as the most important issue hindering the development
of innovation in Brazil. Specific points are related to lack of access to
finance, high cost of borrowing and the high costs of implementing the
innovation. Have the secondary reasons for not seeking innovation include high
risk (MARTINS, 2012).
Management
efforts are fragmented innovation in Brazil. There are 1085 research units
focusing on research and development. These include 313 research institutes and
200 research and development centers (including laboratories). There are 573
companies in the public and private sectors who claim to have conducted
research and development as part of their ongoing operations. The other
participants include universities, providers of services to research institutes
and other centers (INPI, 2013).
The
statistics of intellectual property in Brazil are divided into six categories:
patents, trademarks, computer program, topography internal circuits,
geographical indications and industrial designs (these relate to changes in the
appearance of the product through the use of different resources, colors,
textures, shapes and materials).
The
statistics feature of the INPI disappointing trends on Brazilian innovation
activities. The number of patents generated in Brazil more than doubled between
1998 and 2012, increasing from 14970 to 33780. However, the number of patents
granted was 3455 in 1998 and 3137 in 2012, demonstrating fall within fourteen
years later. The data also show that the majority of patents granted to
residents are, respectively, the field and the technology industry of
mechanical engineering, chemistry, and electrical engineering instruments. In
contrast, the patents granted to non-residents are, respectively, chemistry, mechanical
engineering, electrical engineering and instruments (INPI, 2013).
International
studies for the OECD on innovation in Brazil focused on aggregate macroeconomic
data and are based on traditional models of inputs and outputs. Despite strong
economic growth in Brazil in the last decade, the data shown in the previous
section depict a disappointing picture and reflect years of neglect, lack of
investment in innovation, limited access to capital, lack of legal
infrastructure and lack of focus and public sector private. The conclusions
drawn by these international reports are consistent and relate to the decrease
in employment in knowledge-based sectors of the Brazilian economy, the limited
number of innovative solutions deployed in enterprises, the lack of cooperation
between research centers, universities and private sector and the limited
number of new businesses developed based on new technologies. According to the
OECD economic surveys, Brazilian expenditure on research and development as a
proportion of GNP remain low (OECD, 2013).
The
OECD ranks Brazil as a country recovering, still well behind the European
innovative leaders such as Finland, Denmark or Germany. Countries in this
category are characterized by strong growth in entrepreneurship and has solid
foundations in terms of its technical and scientific body and general
infrastructure but are unable to convert these advantages into a set of
implementable innovations. The OECD also points out that countries showed that
category, mostly improvements with regard to their innovation (resulting in
better scores for innovation) (OECD, 2013). This may reflect the unrealized
potential of Brazil in the area of innovation.
2. METHOD
2.1.
Data
collection
The
survey was developed from the deductive method with a quantitative approach to
use statistics with the primary data collected. The nature research is applied
by wrapping a practical application of local interests of Brazilian MSEs as to
the objectives the research is descriptive to describe a phenomenon that occurs
with MSEs and procedures as it is a survey by using a questionnaire with a
sample representative of the population as well as being a longitudinal study
in which the collected data represent information for a long period of time
(ALENCAR, 2000; RODRIGUES, 2012; TRIVIÑOS, 1987; VERGARA, 2006).
Given
that research on innovation in the MSE sector is still a developing field in
Brazil, the aim of this study is not to put excessive focus on data and
statistical models, the focus is predominantly on descriptive statistics data
in key areas. The purpose was to gather information through interviews with
companies in the MSE sector and subsequently testing them against a larger
sample of the population. For the first phase of the research, the pre-test, twenty
companies (ten micro and ten small businesses) agreed to participate in a one
hour interview. For reasons of practicality, personal interviews were conducted
in December 2011, with Brazilian companies. The questionnaire used in the
interviews was semi structured and aimed to discuss the innovation process
employed by companies selected (with an emphasis on innovation in different
areas of the organization). The interviews also served as the basis for a
questionnaire developed for use in the final part of the study.
The
sampling frame for the second phase of the study consisted of a population of
7.4 million Brazilian MSEs (IBGE, 2013; RAIS, 2013). For the sample to be
statistically significant at a confidence level of 99% and a sampling error of
5%, the required sample is of 664 MEPs, however, 700 were interviewed MSEs
using a probabilistic sampling. Her seven questionnaires were later
disqualified due to inadequate responses four questionnaires were unusable
because they are mid-sized companies. The questionnaires of respondents were
therefore included in the study, yielding a high rate of effective response,
making this one of the largest innovation studies of MSEs in Brazil.
To
obtain the desired level of response, a semi-structured questionnaire was filed
in Google Docs and link to your response by e-mail (please requesting
disclosure) for all SEBRAES of Brazilian states, the respective departments of
administration, industry, development, trade and finance these states, as well
as those of the federal capital and also sent to departments of administration,
economics and accounting of most federal and state universities in the country
units.
The
questionnaire was sent in January 2012, along with a cover letter and the
information collected through July of the same year. The questionnaire
consisted of three parts and had four pages. The first part of the
questionnaire referring to four groups of innovation activities in the business
that could be considered important to investigate the state of innovation in
Brazilian MPE - these were considered innovation inputs.
2.2.
Data
analysis
These
four groups included 20 variables: Product or service innovations (introduction
of new products or services, improvements to existing products or services),
process innovations (education and training of workers, reengineering or
benchmarking, production improvement, business programs quality management,
information exchange, the use of advanced technologies), organizational
innovations (decision making, cooperation systems with customers, suppliers,
financial institutions, organizational structure, teamwork, decentralization,
internal communication) and areas of functional innovations (marketing, supply
chain management, financial management, accounting and human resource management).
In
this part of the questionnaire a Likert five-point scale was used the
questionnaire to assess the level of innovation activity in each category. The
design of the questionnaire was based on literature review. Other parts of this
section of the questionnaire were related to intellectual property management
and financial statistics were concerning the acquisition of tangible assets as
well as financial commitments to research and development.
The
second section of the questionnaire addressed the actual results of the
innovation process and innovation outputs. This section was treated with
predominantly financial indicators, such as annual sales growth, the percentage
of sales generated from new products or services and the level of net profitability;
elsewhere included measures of introduction of new products and the competitive
situation of company.
The
third section of the questionnaire was concerned specifically with the
demographics of companies. In this section questions were used to characterize
the participants and their companies. The demographic profile included
questions about the level of sales, number of employees, number of years in
operation, the export activity of the company and the industry and the level of
education of the owner.
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
3.1.
Interfaces
and boundaries of Brazilian MSEs
The
collected data show significant deficiencies in the innovation orientation of
Brazilian MSEs. Approximately 83.6% of the companies had less than four new
products in the three years 2009-11, representing an average of about one new
product per year. Innovation activities in other areas of the business were
worse - 63% of respondents reported having income levels of up to US$ 200,000.
Low levels of innovation activity are reflected in the limited financial
commitment in research and development - 67.9% of companies invested less than
US$ 40,000 in R&D in the period 2009-11, so that the level of sales
generated from releases new products has been low. About 57% of firms generated
less than 2% of its revenue from the launch of new products. Finally, 78.8% of
respondents stated that they did not generate new patents, while 12.1% said up
to two.
Demographic
data show the financial advantages concerning Brazilian MSEs. Over 90% of all
respondents stated that they were operating a profitable business on the net
profit level and had experienced strong growth in sales (almost 50 % of
respondents said their sales had grown annually between 10% and 20% in the
period 2009-11. Around 33% of respondents said they had owned the business for
less than four years and that most of the sample companies were
microenterprises.
About
the correlation matrix for some key parameters of innovation and demographic
characteristics of the firms, a limited number of correlation values exceeded
0.5, indicating low multicollinearity between variables and a relationship
between the variables of low to moderate. Overall, the data indicate that
Brazilian MSEs have a propensity to innovate low to moderate. The interest in
innovation is most visibly demonstrated by more mature companies: the
correlation between the age of a company and investment in R&D is moderate
(ρ = 0.490). The correlations among the oldest companies are relatively
consistent. Mature companies are most effective for the development of new
products or services (ρ = 0.454), deriving an increase in sales of such
innovations (ρ = 0.519).
Other
correlations provide an interesting insight into the profiles of the
respondents and their innovation activities face to face with his real business
performance. For example, the correlation between the level of investment in
R&D and introduction of new products or services (ρ = 0.312) and the number
of records of property rights (ρ = 0.328) was relatively low. Investments in
R&D were also poorly correlated with the generation of new sales of
research activity (ρ = 0.120), generating high sales levels (ρ = 0.146).
The
results indicate that Brazilian MSEs have challenges on two basic parameters of
innovation: translating investments in R&D for the development of viable
products or services on the market and market them successfully. The results
confirms that investments in R&D do not translate into an improvement in
profitability for MSEs (ρ = - 0.241). This undoubtedly relates to the high
costs required to support continuous innovation efforts. Although innovation
costs can usually be recovered in the future, the data show that this may not
be the case of MSEs in Brazil, these organizations seem unable to get pass the
costs of innovation for consumers.
The
connection between the commitment to R&D and introduction of new products
or service introduction is low (ρ = 0.312). There may be at least three
explanations for this. Firstly, the relationship could suggest that these
organizations rely on alternative methods to improve the supply of goods or
services instead of traditional commitments to R&D within the company. For
example, MSEs operating in the retail industry can rely on improvements in
products or services developed by suppliers. Secondly, companies can focus on
process innovation, upgrading its production facilities rather than actually
inventing new products. Under such circumstances, the mere existence of a new
machine can be susceptible to allowing the development of new products.
Thirdly,
companies may be working with partners (universities, research centers,
agencies, and others) on the development of products and services. From the
point of view of intellectual property rights, registrations and inventions are
weakly correlated with almost all variables (ρ < 0.300), thus demonstrating
the limited interest in developing and protecting intellectual property.
This
undoubtedly stems from weak innovations and initiatives might be further
aggravated by the weakness of intellectual property in Brazil (in case of
hacking or similar practices). The prospects of business financing, capital
requirements and needs, appear to be modestly correlated with the level of
investment in R&D (ρ = 0.541) and for achieving higher sales (ρ = 0.524).
This correlation is logical, since it is difficult to expect an important and
significant commitment to R&D and innovation without funding.
3.2.
Guidance
for innovation
The
key factors of perceived innovation efforts is summarized in the results, which
summarizes the average results of the respondents with regard to the importance
attributed to different innovation initiatives. The highest ranked categories
are discussed in this section. The most important innovation activity was found
to improve existing products and services (mean = 3.96). MSEs confirmed that
they must continuously improve their existing business proposals to remain
competitive with other companies. This is a major determinant of market success
and ultimately translates into strong financial performance.
The
high rank of the implementation of quality management programs (such as ISO)
reflects a growing popularity of these programs between companies (mean =
3.87). They realize the value of these programs from the point of view of
external validation of their market offering, as well as confirmation of
quality and safety of the product or service. The certificates are well
regarded by many stakeholders of companies and are fundamental to distinguish
it competitively local competitors. The introduction of new products or
services related to the first point - i.e. the competitiveness of firms (mean =
3.71).
Issues
relating to distribution and logistics are classified as the fourth most
important category (mean = 3.69). These issues will no doubt highlight the
difficulty of establishing a framework of effective distribution for the
Brazilian market. The management of the supply chain is often regarded as one
of the most expensive parts of the value chain in Brazil.
3.3.
Structure
innovation initiatives
One
of the principal factors extraction with varimax rotation was used to
distinguish clusters of innovation initiatives developed by the interviewees.
Using a load factor of 0.50 as the cutoff for inclusion within a factor,
innovation initiatives developed by MSEs were separated into three factors
(eigenvalues > 1). Consequently, these factors were interpreted as:
“design innovation” (explaining 25.4% of variance), the “implementation
innovation” (explaining 17.5% of variance) and “feature innovation” associated
with the diffusion of innovation in entire organization (explaining 13.8% of
the variance). The twenty innovation initiatives used in the questionnaire
provided a comprehensive framework for innovation to MSEs. The percentage of
variance explained by three factors equals 56.7%. In addition, a Cronbach's
alpha was computed to indicate the reliability of the construct, with values
ranging from 0.74 to 0.87. This confirms the effectiveness of the innovation
parameters chosen to define the environment for innovation in Brazilian MSEs.
The
existence of three factors confirms that MSEs address issues related to
innovation according to common themes or considerations. These factors are also
considered phases of innovation, as the factors that have captured the natural
progression of businesses through the innovation process.
Factor
1, called design innovation, defines issues related to the initial
considerations of innovation in the company. This activity is usually the first
step in the innovation process. Companies initially improve an existing product
or service offerings that can enhance the market position of the company.
Alternatively, other companies buy the intellectual property, however, this can
be expensive, especially for newly established companies that probably do not have
sufficient financial resources. This indicates that companies tend initially to
avoid the development of new products and services.
To
improve the existing supply, the company should consider the most appropriate
delivery method for improving the product or service - this can be done through
the use of advanced technologies (new machinery and equipment for production),
or by introducing of quality management programs (which are popular among some
Brazilian companies). Innovation activities also require cooperation between
different departments and teamwork. Such activities also require financial
planning and analysis, hence the finance department should be involved early in
the innovation process.
Factor
2, termed implementation of innovation involves a focus on operational issues
in converting innovative concepts into implementable solutions, for example,
the implementation of innovation for production companies tend to focus on more
productive efforts. Any reformulation and implementation of new internal
processes are performed based on internal evaluations as benchmarking and
reengineering. There should also be additional training for contract employees
are engaged with other human resources in the company, in addition, the
relationship with the company's stakeholders (suppliers, customers) can also be
refurbished .
Finally,
companies should devote their efforts to internalize concepts of innovation
throughout the company across functional departments, which is captured by
Factor 3. The main activity here is to involve the entire organization in the
innovation process, including management of supply, accounting and human
resources chain. Internalize the consequences of this innovation potentially
include changes in organizational structure and internal links found within the
company. It is also important to note that when the organizational functions
are well coordinated the company may be ready to implement new products or
services and actively participate in internal R&D.
4. CONCLUSION
This
research demonstrated the interfaces and boundaries guidance for innovation
among Brazilian MSEs, demonstrating that most of the companies had less than
four new products in the three years 2009-11. Thus, low levels of innovation
activity are reflected in the limited financial commitment in research and
development, in which the level of sales generated from new product launches
has been low.
Overall,
the data indicate that Brazilian MSEs have a propensity to innovate low to
moderate, so that the interest in innovation is demonstrated more clearly by
more mature companies, reflecting the result that they are more effective for
the development of new products or services.
Thus,
there are two main conclusions that can be reached from this research. First,
the study confirms that there is a specific challenge that MSEs face regarding
their approach to innovation.
Factor
analysis based on the entire sample reveals that there are different issues or
problems that MSEs must face related to the design of innovation, implementation
of innovation and functionality innovation.
In
addition, the Brazilian government needs to understand the dynamics of
innovation MSEs in order to develop effective policies for the sector.
Accordingly, a program of specific government support for these organizations
to established guidelines, clear and unbureaucratic incentives can be effective
in supporting innovation activities of these MSEs. Without him, the current
force structure, they have serious challenges in terms of the propensity to
innovation.
Secondly,
the data confirm that Brazilian MSEs generally have critical difficulties in
marketing their products/services. They are not able to translate its
commitment to R&D in strong market offerings to consumers.
Thus,
the results indicate that Brazilian MSEs have challenges on two basic
parameters of innovation: translating investments in R&D for the
development of viable products or services on the market and market them
successfully.
As
limitations, despite research provide a comprehensive assessment of the
propensity for innovation MSE Brazilian, such evaluation has demonstrated the
extent to which the MSEs sector encompasses innovation, discuss the theme
Innovation in MSEs is quite complex. So obey the guidelines generated by the
Oslo Manual (OECD, 2005) that correspond to factors that should be observed for
the collection and interpretation of data on technological innovation, is no
easy task, considering that MSEs have specifics when it comes innovation,
however, the horizon should be pursued, because as discussed previously in this
section, there is a specific challenge for MSEs when the theme is innovation.
As a
suggestion, future research may focus their efforts on: larger interfaces
between internal and external inter-relationships of the organization with
innovation or the incidence of the shares of R&D in the functional areas
itself. Still, future research could examine these methods as Brazilian MSEs
can develop functional mechanisms can also translate to investments in R&D to
sales and, thus, achieve greater competitiveness.
REFERENCES
ALENCAR, E. (2000) Introdução à metodologia de
pesquisa. Lavras: UFLA.
BURNS,
T.; STALKER, G. (1961) The management of
innovation. Tavistock, London.
Available: http://www.sagepub.com/upm-data/27412_8.pdf. Accessed at:
20/07/2013.
CASSIOLATO, J.; LASTRES, H. (1999) Globalização e inovação localizada:
experiências de sistemas locais no Mercosul. IBICT/MCT, Brasília. Available: http://amxinformatica.com.br/redesist/images/redesist_images/livros/Glob_Mercusul/Pre_Suma_Autores.pdf.
Accessed at: 24/07/2013.
FERREIRA, D. et al (2013) Índice Brasil
de inovação: uma aplicação em nível estadual com foco no estado da BAHIA Revista Geintec - Gestão, Inovação e
Tecnologias, v. 3,n. 1, p. 12-31.
IBGE (2013) Pesquisa nacional por amostra de domicílios. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, São Paulo. Available:
http://www.ibge.gov.br. Accessed at: 21/07/2013.
INPI (2013) Estatísticas. Instituto Nacional da
Propriedade Industrial, Brasília. Available : http://www.inpi.gov.br/portal/artigo/estatisticas.
Accessed at: 22/07/2013.
MARTINS, R. (2012) Os núcleos de
inovação tecnológica como estratégia das políticas de inovação do MCT
(2004-2010) Latin American Journal of
Business Management, v. 3, n. 1, p. 226-247.
NELSON,
R. (1993) National systems of
innovation: a comparative study.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
OECD ( 2013) Country profile statistical Brazil. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Available:
http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/economics/country-statistical-profile-brazil_csp-bra-table-en.
Accessed at: 23/07/2013.
OECD ( 2005) Manual de Oslo: diretrizes para coleta e interpretação
de dados sobre inovação. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and
Development, Paris. Available: http://download.finep.gov.br/imprensa/manual_de_oslo.pdf.
Accessed at: 20/07/2013.
RAIS (2013) Relação Anual de Informações Sociais do Ministério do Trabalho e
Emprego. São Paulo. Available: http://www. mte.gov.br. Accessed at:
20/07/2013.
RODRIGUES, T. K. A.
(2012) Caracterização de MPEs
brasileiras quanto ao conhecimento de ferramentas de gestão. Dissertação (Mestrado em
Administração). Lavras: julho/ UFLA,
available: http://repositorio.ufla.br/bitstream/1/440/1/DISSERTACAO_Caracteriza%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20de%20MPE%E2%80%99s%20brasileiras%20quanto%20ao%20conhecimento%20de%20ferramentas%20de%20gest%C3%A3o.pdf.
Accessed at: 20/06/2013.
TRIVIÑOS, A. (1987) Introdução à pesquisa em ciências sociais: a pesquisa qualitativa em educação. São Paulo: Atlas.
VERGARA, S. C. (
2006) Projetos e relatórios de pesquisa
em administração. São Paulo: Atlas.
WIPO (
2013) Section A: patents, utility models and microorganisms. World Intellectual
Property Organization. Available: http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/ipstats/en/wipi/pdf/941_2012_section_a.pdf
. Accessed at: 25/07/2013.