Bruna
Borges Soares
Universidade
Federal do Sul da Bahia, Brazil
E-mail: soaresborges.b@gmail.com
Lucas
Farias de Sousa
Universidade
Estadual de Santa Cruz, Brazil
E-mail: eng.sousalucas@gmail.com
Mariana
Aguiar dos Santos
Universidade
Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia, Brazil
E-mail: marianaaguiar2009.1@hotmail.com
Submission: 12/9/2020
Revision: 1/8/2021
Accept: 1/20/2021
ABSTRACT
The adequacy of working conditions to safety
standards has a fundamental importance in the company's environment. The
efficient implementation of an Occupational Health and Safety Management System
allows the reduction of risks associated with accidents; reduce costs to the
employer and a strong ally in the competitive market when the safety indicator
is a decisive factor in the choice of suppliers. The aim of this study was to
evaluate occupational safety and health (OSH) practices at work in a plastic
recycling plant located in northeastern Brazil, as well as to identify
opportunities for improvement. Data collection was carried out from on-site
visits and control measures were proposed for the risk factors identified. The
evaluation made it possible to identify that the recycling activity is
characterized by several occupational hazards, which are aggravated by
inadequate working conditions. The non-conformity of jobs, the use of obsolete
equipment and the lack of specific training to perform certain functions were
identified as the most relevant aspects. For these, opportunities for
improvement and adequation were connected. The study results can help other
companies that perform the same activities to improve their performance in OSH
based on the points of improvement presented.
Keywords: Occupational Safety and Health, Occupational Hazards, Labor Practices, Individual Protection Equipment, Work Accident
1.
INTRODUCTION
Plastic is synthetic
polymer highly flexible, which can be heated, formed and molded into different
ways (Gulseven et al., 2019). It has many valuable uses, which makes humanity
very dependent on it. In consequence, the waste plastic generation has been
increasing worldwide. It is estimated that 500 billion plastic bags were used each
year and, from all of the consumer plastics, 50% was designed to be thrown away
after being used only once (UNEP, 2018).
Thereby, one way to
reduce the heavy plastic load on the planet is the material recovery from recycling.
The most common method of recycling is called mechanical (Goodship, 2007). It
consists of a number of operations such as material separating, fragmentation
(grinding), washing and separation, drying, extrusion, as well as the
transformation of the raw material recycled by the processing industries (Soto
et al., 2018). These activities can present several hazards occupational for
employees, compromising their safety and health.
In addition, accidents
at work can cause irreversible damage to the assets, resources and reputation
of the affected organizations (Aburumman, Newnam & Fildes, 2019). According
to the Ministry of Finance, in 2017, were recorded 549,405 accidents in Brazil
(AEAT, 2017) including accidents registered as typical, commuting and
occupational disease; and those without registration (report of accident at
work). However, these numbers can be many times higher than those captured.
Occupational Health and
Safety (OHS) is not restricted to the technical order of prevention and/or repair
of occupational accidents. It is an indicator of social sustainability
(Hutchins & Sutherland, 2008) and a fundamental component of the elements
that integrate the responsibility of organizations. Thus, good performance in
OSH is decisive for the success of companies. Besides reducing the risk of
accidents, this system promotes the health and satisfaction of workers, improve
the operating results and the image of the organization, creating new market
opportunities (Oliveira, Oliveira & Almeida, 2010), especially when issues
related to safety are decisive factors.
The cases of accident
and death at the workplace are directly associated with the bad OSH management
or no application standard (either through negligence or malpractice), causing
exposure of the employees to routine exercises of gestures, postures and mental
activities that can cause overload. This also happens in recycling plants,
especially in places where regulation is flawed or low enforced.
The identification of
occupational risks in the work environment is the first step to minimize or
even eliminate occupational risks. Therefore, the present study aimed to
identify and qualitatively assess the occupational risks in a plastic recycling
plant located in northeastern Brazil, besides suggest control measures for the
critical points (risk factors) identified.
2.
LITERATURE REVIEW
There are many risks
associated with the recycling sector. In a systematic review of published
literature and two UK databases, Poole and Basu (2017) identified health risks,
biological effects and occupational diseases of waste and recycling workers.
The heavy manual labor, as well as exposure to bioaerosols, heavy metals and
organic pollutants, were the main occupational hazards mentioned.
When recycling plants are compared
with other solid waste management facilities (as an example sanitary landfills,
transfer stations, mechanical-biological treatment plants and HealthCare Waste
incinerators), this can be even more worrying. Kontogianni and Moussiopoulos
(2017) applied structured questionnaires and interviews with safety officers
and workers at solid waste management facilities and observed that, among them,
material recovery was one of those activities with the highest risk level.
Neitzel et al. (2013)
observed that, among the risks that the scrap recycling workers are exposed,
can be cited substantial noise exposures, traffic accidents, unsafe work
surfaces, lacerations/abrasions, repetitive postures and movements. These
physical, chemical, biological, ergonomic and physical risks are listed and
studied by other authors as well.
Burns et al. (2016)
characterized the noise levels experienced by e-waste recycling workers in
Ghana. The results indicated that workers exposed to noise levels above the
recommended level presented relatively common hearing difficulties, moderate to
high levels of stress, as well as several numbers of symptoms (for example,
dizziness and shortness of breath) that may indicate cardiovascular problems.
In a study carried out
in Quebec recycling plants, the authors identified ergonomic risks were related
to back pain, due to the inadequate postures adopted in handling objects.
According to the authors, the movements, the posture of the 6worker and the
effort required to carry out the activities are sources of tension,
particularly in the arms, back, shoulders and wrist (Lavoie & Guertin,
2001). Cockell et al. (2004) also identified sources of discomfort in a sorting
sector of a cooperative formed by recyclable material collectors, such as movement
restriction, extreme movements of the shoulder and spine.
Concerning occupational accident
risks, according to Lavoie and Guertin (2001), cuts on hands and forearms are
common in waste recycling plants. Cioca et al. (2018) checked that there is
risk of cuts during the manual separation of materials, since the waste may
contain impurities and materials that are not suitable for separation
(especially in the first stage). The authors point out that the use of personal
protective equipment can reduce the risks associated with the process, as well
as the implementation of the mechanical separation system.
Thus, a situation of non-safety in
labor occupations has a direct personal impact, once it can cause physical and
psychological weakness in employees and decrease their work capacity. This also
generates a chain of problems for their families, the company, the government
and society (Pie et al, 2020).
3.
METHODOLOGY
3.1.
Research method and data gathering
procedure
The study was conducted in a
recycling plant located in the Northeastern of Brazil. The data collected were
about the environmental and occupational hazards of the plant (physical,
chemical, biological, ergonomic and accident) through a checklist and
consultation of company files during visits in loco between June to August
2019.
The activities evaluated were those
related to the manufacture of recycled products (Figure 1), as follows: primary
screening, secondary screening, grinding, washing and drying, agglutination,
granules extrusion, extrusion of ecological stake. The Transport of raw
material and finished products, as well as the maintenance activities and
production coordination are also included.
The risk factors were analyzed separately
for each of these activities. They were identified and assessed for source,
time of exposure, as well as trajectory and propagation of agents. The control
document of the Environmental Risk Prevention Program (PPRA) was used as a
supporting material. From this information and existing control measures
(administrative, collective and individual) proposed improvements, based on
regulatory standards on health and safety at work.
3.2.
Location and characteristics of the
case study
The main economic activity of the
company is the conversion and recovery of post-consumer waste plastic in
recycled products (bags and ecological stake). The company has been in
operation since 2001 and 29 employees that work 40-hour workweek. The total
plant area is 14,500 m², approximately 10% of built area. Comprises an office,
a sorting area, a production hall, a greenhouse and a wash tank area.
Ventilation and lighting occur naturally (for the latter there is an artificial
supply when necessary).
The machinery used in the recycling
process are agglutination machine, extruders, milling machines, press machines,
plastic chippers, wash tank and dryers. In this study, the risks associated
with the production of ecological stakes and the recycled granules were
included. The manufacture of recycled bags was not included, although all the
processes described here are part of their production process.
3.3.
Description of the manufacture of
recycled products
The following description was based
on on-site visits to a recycling plant where the case study was conducted. It
is a description of all the steps that make up the production process. The processes may be or not specific to this
particular industry.
1) Transport: The employee transports,
collects and delivers cargo in general. It is also responsible for inspection
of the vehicle and cargo, their documentation, as well as defining routes and
regularizing transportation. This activity is realized sitting with the
movement of the arms and legs.
2) Primary screening: The employee
transports the bales of plastic scraps from the unloading sector to the sorting
sector (with the aid of a wheelbarrow).
On a table, it separates the material by type and color, puts it in bags
and deposits them close to the grinding sector. This activity is performed
standing with movements of arms and legs.
3) Grinding, washing and drying: The
employee places scraps and plastic lees in the mill. The material is fragmented
and transported automatically through tubes to the wash tank. After washing, it
is mechanically dry (through a suitably designed drier) and forwarded to the
greenhouse (a suitably designed drier is used). Then, the plastic material is
placed in bags. This activity is performed standing with movements of arms and
legs.
4) Agglutination: The employee transports
the bag by crane (with clean plastic material) to the work platform. He fills
the agglutination machine manually and adds water progressively. In this step,
the material is homogenized. Then, is removed from the machine and transported
with a wheelbarrow to the extrusion sector. Beyond the homogenized material,
the process also generates a residual plastic (lees) that is headed to
secondary screening and reprocessed. This activity of agglutination is
performed standing with movements of arms and legs.
5) Secondary screening: This stage
happens with the residual plastic of agglutination (lees). The employee shares
the lees generated into several smaller pieces, with the aid of an ax/or a
chainsaw and place them in a bag. The bag is then transported to the grinding,
washing and drying stage (stage 3) where the material is reprocessed. The
activity has as characteristics of an intense work of the arms and trunk, since
it loads and saws the lees manually, raises and/or pushes significant heavy
loads.
6) Granules extrusion: The employee
collects the agglutinated plastic with a bucket and fills the extruder funnel
in the platform. The material is melted, forming hot threads that are
subsequently cooling in a basin by an automated process. Then, taken to the
shredder where the beans are ready for bagging come out. The activity is
performed standing with movements of legs and arms.
7) Ecological stake extrusion: The
employee collects the agglutinated plastic material, goes up in the platform
and, with the aid of a bucket, puts the material in the funnel of the extruder
where is melted automatically. The employee fills the mold/form with the melted
plastic, directs it to the press. Then, is cooled in a cooling basin. The
ecological stake is unmolded and stored in the expedition sector. The mains
characteristics of the activity are intense work of the arms and trunk with leg
movements.
8) Maintenance activities: The employee
performs preventive and corrective maintenance on equipment and machines
on-site or in the workshop. Sporadically performs welding, cutting and
painting. The activity is performed standing with movements of legs and arms.
The main characteristic of the activity is standing work with movements of legs
and arms.
9) Production coordination: The
employee coordinates the team, monitors quality and production, participates in
meetings, and the implementation of new projects. The main characteristics of
this activity are standing and sitting work with few movements of arms and
legs.
Figure 1:
Fluxogram of the process and identification of occupational hazards.
4.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The main activities, occupational
hazard agents, possible damage to health, existing control measures and
proposed presented are included in Table 1.
All the activities analyzed showed
occupational hazard agents influenced by several factors. This signals the
importance of health and safety at work in the execution of activities related
to the recycling of materials.
Table
1: Occupational hazard identified in the
recycling plant, possible damage to health, existing control measures and
proposed
Activities |
Hazard
factors |
Possible
damage to health |
Existing
control measures |
Proposed
control measures |
Physical Occupational Risk |
||||
Primary screening |
Exposure to noise |
Hearing loss, irritation, insomnia, lack of appetite
and headaches |
Use of PPE (hearing protection) and reduction of
exposure time in Primary screening activities and Grinding, washing and
drying |
Maintain
existing control measures, as well as, conduct training, periodic inspection
of the use of PPE, an inspection of noisy machines, quantitative assessment
of the noise and reduced exposure time in secondary screening activity. |
Grinding, washing and drying |
||||
Secondary screening |
||||
Agglutination |
Exposure to noise and heat |
Hearing loss, irritation, insomnia, headaches and
dehydration exhaustion |
Use of PPE (shell-type and plug-type hearing
protector), natural ventilation and 15 minutes rest (break) |
Maintain
existing control measures, training, periodic inspection of the use of PPE,
an inspection of noisy machines, quantitative assessment of the noise and
increase natural ventilation and/or artificial ventilation with the
installation of fans. |
Granules extrusion |
||||
Ecological stake extrusion |
Exposure to noise, humidity and heat |
Hearing loss, irritation, insomnia, headaches,
dermatitis and exhaustion |
Reduction of exposure time, use of PPE (shell and
plug hearing protector), use of waterproof glove and natural ventilation |
Maintain
existing control measures, training, periodic inspection of the use of PPE,
an inspection of noisy machines, quantitative assessment of noise and heat,
and increase natural ventilation and/or installation of artificial
ventilation. |
Maintenance activities |
Exposure to noise and non-ionizing radiation |
Hearing loss, irritation, insomnia, headaches,
dermatitis and burns |
Reduction of exposure time, use of PPE, such as
shell and plug hearing protector, welding mask, safety glasses, uniform and
glove |
Maintain
existing control measures and inspection of the use of PPE. |
Production coordination |
Exposure to noise |
Hearing loss, irritation, insomnia, headaches and
burns |
Use of PPE (hearing protection) |
Maintain
existing control measures and inspection of the use of PPE. |
Chemical Occupational Risk |
||||
Primary screening |
Breathable Dust |
Irritation of eyes and respiratory system |
Training and use of PPE such as safety glasses,
fold-flat dust Masks in primary
screening activities and Type PFF1 respirators (minimum efficiency of 80%) in
Grinding, washing and drying activitys |
Maintain
existing control measures and install a cover on the mill filling opening
(Maintain existing control measures and install a cover on the mill filling
opening (in supply). |
Grinding, washing and
drying |
||||
Agglutination |
Plastic dust and fumes |
Irritation of the eyes, respiratory system and
neurological disorders |
Training and use of PPE such as safety glasses, type
PFF1 respirators (minimum efficiency of 80%) and type PFF2 respirators
(minimum efficiency of 94%) for Granules
extrusion and Ecological stake extrusion. |
Maintain
existing control measures, install exhaust fans and a lid on the
agglutination machines, periodic inspection of the use of PPE and increase
the ventilation of the workplace. |
Granules extrusion |
||||
Ecological stake extrusion |
||||
Maintenance activities |
Dust, metal fumes, oils and greases |
Irritation of the eyes and respiratory system,
neurological disorders and metal intoxication |
Use of PPE, such as safety glasses, type PFF1 respirators
(minimum efficiency of 80%) and PFF2 (minimum efficiency of 94%), welding
mask and canvas glove |
Maintain
existing control measures, periodic inspection of the use of PPE and increase
the ventilation of the workplace. |
Biological Occupational Risk |
||||
Primary screening |
Microorganisms |
Dermatitis and infectious diseases |
Use of PPE, such as a waterproof glove, PVC apron,
rubber boot, long sleeve shirt, type PFF1 respirators (minimum efficiency of 80%) and use of alcohol for
cleaning |
Maintain existing
control measures, specific training and periodic inspection of PPE. |
Grinding, washing and
drying |
||||
Ergonomic Occupational Risk |
||||
Transport |
Extreme posture - activity performed for a long
period in the same position (sitting) |
Loss of neuromuscular and/or osteoarticular
functions |
Training, seat adjustment, routine vehicle
inspection and rest stops |
Maintain existing
control measures. |
Primary screening |
Requirement of physical effort (manual transport of
bales) |
Loss of neuromuscular and/or osteoarticular
functions |
Use of a pallet truck and manual trolley, manual
cargo transport training and 15 minutes rest (break) |
Maintain
existing control measures, the suitability of the floor, mechanization the
transport of bales and purchase of more modern pallet truck. |
Extreme/forced posture (activity performed for a
long period in the same position, standing). |
Loss of neuromuscular and/or osteoarticular
functions |
Installation of the seats in places where employees
can use during breaks and 15-minute pause |
Maintain existing
control measures. |
|
Grinding, washing and
drying |
Physical effort requirement (strength) |
Loss of neuromuscular and/or osteoarticular
functions |
Training, use of pallet truck and 15 minutes rest
(break) |
Maintain existing
control measures, mechanize the transport of bags and purchase more modern pallet trucks. |
Uncomfortable posture adopted in the carrying out
the activity (removing scraps from bags and filling the mill) |
Loss of neuromuscular and/or osteoarticular
functions |
Training and 15 minutes rest (break) |
Install a 70
cm wooden structure to position the bag when filling the mill. |
|
Agglutination |
Physical effort requirement (strength) |
Loss of neuromuscular and/or osteoarticular
functions |
Automatic pulleys, use of pallet trucks, help from
other employees and training |
Maintain
existing control measures and purchase of more modern pallet trucks. |
Secondary screening |
Extreme/forced posture (activity performed for a
long period in the same position, standing) |
Loss of neuromuscular and/or osteoarticular
functions |
Training |
Maintain
existing control measures and adjust workbench to the height of the employee. |
Requirement of physical effort (manual transport of
bales) |
Loss of neuromuscular and/or osteoarticular functions |
Use of pallet truck and manual cart, help from other
employees and training |
Maintain
existing control measures and mechanize the transport of bales. |
|
Granules extrusion |
Requirement of physical effort (lifting and manual
transport of weight to supply the extruder) |
Loss of neuromuscular and/or osteoarticular
functions |
Training, load reduction (reducing the size of the
supply bucket) and 15 minutes rest (break) |
Maintain existing
control measures. |
Ecological stake extrusion |
Physical effort requirement (strength) Physical effort requirement (strength) |
Loss of neuromuscular and/or osteoarticular
functions |
Training, 15 minutes rest (break) in ecological stake extrusion activity and use
of manual trolley and winch of 1,000 kilograms in maintenance services |
Maintain
existing control measures, as well as, realized periodic safety inspection.
In addition, Ecological stake extrusion change the location of the cooling basin
(positioning it at the outlet of the press machine) and automatically connect
the outlet of the press machine shapes to the cooling basin. |
Maintenance activities |
||||
Accident Occupational Risk |
||||
Transport |
Traffic
accident |
Polytrauma
and death |
Qualification in the category, inspection and
preventive maintenance of the vehicle |
Maintain
existing control measures, traffic education training, periodic inspection of
the blood pressure and eye. |
Primary screening |
Contact with materials, tools and equipment that can
cause cuts, excoriation or perforations |
Wounds and
infections |
Use of PPE, as a fabric glove and safety boot |
Protective
gloves against biological and cutting risks, as well as periodic inspection
of the use of PPE. |
Grinding, washing and drying |
Contact with materials, tools and equipment that can
cause cuts, excoriation or perforations |
Amputation
and injuries |
Accident prevention training and protection cap for
razor |
Maintain
existing control measures and install an aperture sensor on the cap of the
razors. |
Fall (unevenness of the grinding machine supply
site) |
Polytrauma
and death. |
Not
identified |
Level the
worker's place of displacement and offer accident prevention training. |
|
Agglutination |
Contact with sharp equipment (razor of the
agglutination machine). |
Amputation,
excoriation and injuries |
Specific training for accident prevention |
Maintain
existing control measures and adapt the machine according to NR-12
standardization. |
Fall (platform of the agglutination machine) |
Polytrauma
and death. |
Training |
Install
safety guard rail on agglutination machine platforms. |
|
Secondary screening |
Contact with materials, tools and equipment that can
cause cuts, excoriation or perforations |
Amputation
and injuries |
Use of PPE, such as leather glove and safety boot |
Specific
training, use of leather leggings, periodic inspection of the use of PPE and
adaptation of the workplace. |
Granules extrusion |
Contact with hot surfaces |
1st, 2nd and 3rd degree burn |
Training and use of PPE (glove for high
temperature). |
Maintain
existing control measures, thermal insulation of hot areas of the machine and
periodic inspection of the use of PPE. |
Fall (extruder supply platform) |
Polytrauma
and death. |
Not
identified |
Install
safety guard rail on platforms and stairs |
|
Crushing of upper limbs (pricking cylinders). |
Amputations, injuries, bruises and/or fractures |
Training and fixed protection of the moving parts of
the pricking machine |
Maintain existing
control measures. |
|
Ecological stake extrusion |
Fall (extruder supply platform) |
Polytrauma and death. |
Not identified |
Install
safety guard rail on platforms and stairs. |
Crushing of upper limbs (press machine). |
Amputations, injuries, bruises and/or fractures. |
Training, bimanual and simultaneous activation |
Maintain
existing control measures and protect the side area of the
press machine (leaving only the opening of the mold-free). |
|
Contact with
hot surfaces |
Burns |
Training and use of PPE (leather glove and knitted
fabric glove) |
Maintain
existing control measures, thermally insulate hot areas, use of
high-temperature gloves by employees and periodically inspect the use of PPE. |
|
Maintenance activities |
High level drops |
Polytrauma and death. |
Training and use of PPE as for safety belt and
helmet |
Maintain
existing control measures, periodic inspection of the use of PPE, follow
standardization NR-35, periodic training on accident prevention and
inspection recurrent of equipment safety. |
Contact with materials, tools and equipment that can
cause cuts, excoriation or perforations |
Amputation
and injuries |
Training and use of PPE, such as gloves and leather
aprons |
Maintain
existing control measures, accident prevention training, an inspection of equipment
safety items and use of PPE (periodically for all of them). |
|
Contact with hot surfaces (blowtorch handling) |
Burns |
Training and use of PPE, such as leather glove and
apron, seat belt and helmet |
||
Production coordination |
Falling materials, equipment and machinery |
Polytrauma |
Use of PPE (safety shoe). |
Maintain existing
control measures. |
Occupational hazards:
Physical (NR-15), Chemical (NR-15), Biological (NR-15), Ergonomic (NR-17) and
Accidental (Law No. 8213/91).
In this study, all 5 types of
occupational hazards were observed (physical, chemical, biological, ergonomic
and accident).
The most recurrent was the accident
risks. They were present in all activities of the recycling plant, can be offer
damage health, since minor injuries, until amputations and death.
Were identified risks of traffic
accidents (in the transport activity), contact with sharp materials, hot
surfaces, falls risk, as well as crushing of limbs. These risks can be
mitigated through the use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and the
implementation of structures in specific machines (in order to make their use
safer for the employee).
Then, the most frequent occupational
hazards were physical and ergonomic. These risks were present in 8 of the 9
activities evaluated. The physical risk was in the most part due to noise
exposure, as well as to a lesser extent, exposure to heat, humidity and
non-ionizing radiation.
The noise is very common in diverse
work environments, including in the recycling industry of other materials
(Lavoie & Guertin, 2001). The exposure above the limits established by the
NR-15 standard can cause damage to health, such as hearing loss, irritation,
insomnia and headaches. Thus, the implementation of the proposed here measures
(training, periodic inspection of the use of PPE and noisy machines) is
essential to achieve a greater degree of safety in related activities. However,
a more accurate assessment of the exposition of employees must involve quantitative
means of measurement (through decibel meter and dosimeter, for example).
The ergonomic risk was evidenced due
to inadequate postures, transport of overweight loads, as well as the use of
obsolete or ergonomically inadequate machines and equipment. Such situations
can lead to loss of neuromuscular and/or osteoarticular functions in the
employees.
The chemical risks were present in
six evaluated activities. These risks are from fumes generated in the heating
of plastic and for shear dust. Carcinogenic, teratogenic, irritating,
asphyxiating, anesthetic, allergic effects, among others, are the possible
damages caused by dangerous exposure to chemical agents. In addition, according
to Cockell et al. (2004), the accumulation of dust and contamination by "remnants"
of chemicals present in the collected containers can cause respiratory
disorders and allergies.
Among the measures proposed, the
installation of exhaust fans and the increase in ventilation at the workplace
is the best to be made. Kozajda et al. (2017), at assessing the levels of
inhalable dust in waste sorting plants, verified the low level of dust in the
facilities were certainly due to efficient ventilation and air conditioning
systems. Second Schlosser et al, (2015), the classification rooms must be
equipped with a ventilation system that allows operators to work directly under
clean and unidirectional airflow.
Ventilation is also an important
aspect of thermal comfort (Guimarães et al., 2018). The proposal is also made
here for the other sectors that generate dust since the renewal of the air in
the environment helps to minimize the concentration of pollutants and
contaminants, as well as reduces the transport of biological agents, regardless
of the type of management waste plant.
The biological risk is present in
two moments: (1) In primary screening and, (2) in joint activities of the
grinding, washing, and drying. This risk is due to the contact of the employees
with potentially contaminated plastic waste by microorganisms, once the material
was obtained from diverse origins (including material collected from landfills
or dumps by third parties) and can offer damage, such as infectious diseases
and dermatitis.
Among other agents, humidity
conditions in most waste management facilities favor the growth of fungi. Some
of these fungi can produce mycotoxins, some of them can be harmful to health
(Schlosser et al., 2020). Besides, employees may be exposed to other different
pathogenic microorganisms inherent in the handling of plastic waste. Among the
control measures proposed, the periodic inspection of the use of PPE and
specific training for some workers was repeatedly mentioned.
According to Kontogianni and
Moussiopoulos (2017), the ‘‘Safety culture" or “safety attitude” is
undeniably relevant for achieving a certain degree of safety performance in
facilities. Also, the conduction of training courses, as well as the constant
presence of safety officers during working hours have great importance, since
in case of absence of them can lead to a high level of risk in the
installation.
The activities of the factory, due
to their characteristics, need constant attention regarding the protection of
the employee. Occupational hazards are imminent in all activities carried.
Although there are some practices
that the factory still needs greater investment, such as the acquisition of a
decibel meter to measure noise in the environment, replacement of obsolete
equipment with more modern ones, installation of artificial ventilation and/or
increased ventilation natural, installation of complementary safety parts in
machines, use of protective gloves against biological risks by employees,
adaptation in some jobs post and training for the execution of specific
activities.
According to Benite (2004), an
ineffective occupational health and safety system are the cause of the costs of
occupational accidents. Therefore, there is an inverse relationship between
occurred accidents and the costs of non-safety. This require a significant
amount of resources whenever an accident occurs. Thus, implementing the
measures proposed is the most suitable. These measures can also help other
recycling companies that carry similar activities or processes to achieve
better performance in OSH.
Safety culture in companies is an
important aspect to prevent injuries related to job activities. A job place
with a poor safety culture can be characterized by management's failure to
recognize or address gaps in their security system (Aburumman, Newnam &
Fildes, 2019). Thus, this type of study (with risk identification) is an
important step for OSH in companies.
However, to avoid possible safety
problems, in addition to the assessment of potential risks, the recording of
previous accident scenarios (level of severity and probability of the event
occurring) must be taken into account (Kontogianni & Moussiopoulos, 2017).
It is important to mention that
small companies can find it difficult to manage and effectively control risks
at the workplace. Regulations are seen as overly complex to apply and
adaptation may require a high investment when are many critical points of
security (which need improvements). This challenge is compounded when
production processes involve dynamically planned workflows as cited for Shafei
et al. (2018). However, it is important to mention that some measures are
simple to implement, such as training, inspections of the use of PPE and small
adjustments in activities and machines.
Lastly, the cost analysis of other
actions proposed can be necessary. This will contribute to its implementation
and the establishment of prevention programs aimed at the well-being and safety
of employees in the recycling plant.
5.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMENDATIONS
This study allowed us to obtain real
results on the working conditions in a plastic waste recycling plant. As far as
is known, it is the only work that evaluated occupational hazards related to
this segment, since the percentage of recycled plastic material in the world
(especially in Brazil) is still small and consequently there are few recycling
plants.
The plastic recycling process is
characterized by presenting occupational hazards in all functions, with
emphasis on accident, physical and ergonomic. The risks are exacerbated by
inadequate working conditions, inadequate job position for some activities,
obsolete machinery and equipment, as well as the lack of specific safety
training for certain functions. An advantage of this recycling sector is the
absence of exposure to heavy metals, as in e-waste recycling plants. However,
the risks mentioned can also be detrimental to the health and safety of
employees.
Some actions are essential to
improve the protection of the employees. The preventive and periodic
maintenance of machinery, the training of employees regarding safety rules and correct
and safe ways of carrying out activities, in addition to the presence of
professionals specialized in safety and health in the labor work, contribute to
mitigate or even eliminate risks that recycling activities generate for the
safety and health of employees.
The adoption of measures proposed is
important for the occupational safety and health of the employees. Some actions
are easy to implement (in mostly), can generate positive results in relation to
the increase in performance in OSH, as well as health and motivation gains for
the employees. However, it is important to note that in many cases, the
implementation of new security initiatives may require a necessary capital
investment.
REFERENCES
Aburumman, M., Newnam, S., & Fildes, B. (2019). Evaluating the effectiveness of workplace interventions in improving safety culture: A systematic review. Safety science, 115, 376-392.
Benite, A. G. (2004). Sistemas de Gestão da Segurança e Saúde no Trabalho. São Paulo: O Nome da Rosa.
Burns, K., Sun,
K., Fobil, J., & Neitzel, R. (2016). Heart Rate, Stress, and Occupational Noise
Exposure among Electronic Waste Recycling Workers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,
13(1), 140. doi:10.3390/ijerph13010140
Cioca, L. I., Ferronato, N., Viotti, P., Magaril, E., Ragazzi, M., Torretta, V., & Rada, E. C. (2018). Risk assessment in a materials recycling facility: Perspectives for reducing operational issues. Resources, 7(4), 85. doi.org/10.3390/resources7040085
Cockell, F. F., De Carvalho, A. M. C, Camarotto, J. A, & Bento, P. E. G. (2004). A triagem de lixo reciclável: análise ergonômica da atividade. Revista Brasileira de Saúde Ocupacional, 29(110), 17-26. doi.org/10.1590/S0303-76572004000200003
Goodship, V.
(2007). Plastic
recycling. Science Progress, 90(4),
245–268. doi:10.3184/003685007x228748
Guimarães, P. P.,
Fiedler, N. C., da Silva Oliveira, J. T., Leite, Â. M. P., & De Souza Lima,
J. S. (2018). Análise ergonômica do ambiente de Trabalho na fabricação de
ferramentas florestais. Ciência Florestal, 28(4), 1651-1665.
doi.org/10.5902/1980509835315
Gulseven, O., Ashkanani, S., Abdullah, S.,
Ismaeil, H., Alkandari, H., & Baroun, M. (2019). A sustainable model for
enhancing road quality with recycled plastic bags. Kuwait Journal of Science, 46(4), 112-119.
Hutchins, M. J., & Sutherland, J. W.
(2008). An exploration of measures of social sustainability and their
application to supply chain decisions. Journal
of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1688–1698. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.06.001
Kontogianni, S., & Moussiopoulos, N.
(2017). Investigation of the occupational health and safety conditions in
Hellenic solid waste management facilities and assessment of the in-situ hazard
level. Safety Science, 96, 192–197.
doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2017.03.025
Kozajda, A., Jeżak, K., Cyprowski, M.,
& Szadkowska-Stańczyk, I. (2017). Inhalable dust, endotoxins and
(1–3)-β-d-glucans as indicators of exposure in waste sorting plant environment.
Aerobiologia, 33(4), 481–491.
doi:10.1007/s10453-017-9484-4
Lavoie, J., & Guertin, S. (2001).
Evaluation of Health and Safety Risks in Municipal Solid Waste Recycling
Plants. Journal of the Air & Waste
Management Association, 51(3), 352–360. doi:10.1080/10473289.2001.10464278
Neitzel, R. L., Crollard, A., Dominguez, C., Stover, B., & Seixas, N. S. (2013). A mixed-methods evaluation of health and safety hazards at a scrap metal recycling facility. Safety Science, 51(1), 432–440. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2012.08.012
Oliveira, O. J. D., Oliveira, A. B. D., & Almeida, R. A. D. (2010). Gestão da segurança e saúde no trabalho em empresas produtoras de baterias automotivas: um estudo para identificar boas práticas. Revista Produção, 20(3), p. 481-490.
Pie, A. C. S., Fernandes, R. C. P., Carvalho, F. M., & Porto, L. A. (2020). Presenteeism and associated factors in industry workers. Revista Brasileira de Saúde Ocupacional, 45(13). Epub April 03. doi.org/10.1590/2317-6369000003118
Poole, C. J. M.,
& Basu, S. (2017). Systematic
Review: Occupational illness in the waste and recycling sector. Occupational Medicine, 67(8), 626–636.
doi:10.1093/occmed/kqx153
Schlosser, O., Déportes, I. Z., Facon, B.,
& Fromont, E. (2015). Extension of the sorting instructions for household
plastic packaging and changes in exposure to bioaerosols at materials recovery facilities.
Waste Management, 46, 47–55.
doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2015.05.022
Schlosser, O., Robert, S., & Noyon, N.
(2020). Airborne mycotoxins in waste recycling and recovery facilities:
Occupational exposure and health risk assessment. Waste Management, 105, 395–404. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2020.02.031
Shafei, A., Hodges, J., & Mayer, S. (2018). Ensuring Workplace Safety in Goal-based Industrial Manufacturing Systems. Procedia Computer Science, 137, p. 90–101. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2018.09.009
Soto, J. M., Blázquez,
G., Calero, M., Quesada, L., Godoy, V., & Martín-Lara, M. Á. (2018). A real case study of mechanical
recycling as an alternative for managing of polyethylene plastic film presented
in mixed municipal solid waste. Journal
of Cleaner Production. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.302
UNEP - United Nations Environment Programme. World Environment Day 2018:
Overviewhttps://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/25398/WED%20Messaging%20Two-Page%2027April.pdf?sequence=12&isAllowed=y