WORKPLACE INCIVILITY AND TURNOVER INTENTION
AMONG NURSES OF PUBLIC HEALTHCARE SYSTEM IN PAKISTAN
Abdul
Samad
Muhammad
Ali Jinnah University Karachi, Pakistan
E-mail: Dahriabdulsamad@gmail.com
Salman
Bashir Memon
Shaheed Benazir Bhutto University, Pakistan
E-mail:
salman.bashir@sbbusba.edu.pk
Ayaz Ali Maitlo
Sindh
University, Larkana Campus, Pakistan
E-mail: ayazalimaitlo@gmail.com
Submission: 8/9/2020
Revision: 9/1/2020
Accept: 9/14/2020
ABSTRACT
Keywords:
Workplace incivility, occupational
stress, turnover intention, healthcare system
1.
INTRODUCTION
Understanding
employee behavior is a major concern of behavioral science over the decades to make future predictions and control
employee behavior, so as to enhance
employee efficiency and organizational efficacy. From an organizational perspective, organizational
performance is vital that including many factors and variables (Çelik et
al., 2011). Moreover, contemporary organizations contain
a diverse workforce that poses numerous
challenges regarding quality interpersonal interaction at the workplace (Andersson & Pearson, 1999).
A diverse workforce means one must input more effort to understand, interpret,
and act to different social norms. In such a situation, prominent policies must
prevail to hold quite clear and mutual norms for reverent behavior at the workstation
(Mor Barak et al., 2001). Where, lack of non-verbal cues, or because of physical absence
(in case of distant communication) may be perceived negatively that leads to an
exhibition of negative behaviors which
are assumed as incivility at the workplace
(Pearson et al., 2000).
Accordingly,
organizational psychology literature depicts frequent instances of rude and
discourteous behaviors and are on the rise (Pearson et al., 2000). Statistically, Cortina et al.,
(2000) found that 71% of employees
experienced ‘uncivilized behavior’ during
the past five years. Other studies found
75% of university employees, 79% law enforcement employees, 71% court
employees, and 85% nurses experienced incivility at the workplace (Cortina & Magley, 2009; Lewis & Malecha, 2011).
Literature
shows that employees who experience incivility may involve in negative
‘emotional responses’ to the situation. For instance, Bibi et al. (2013) found
positive relations between incivility and production deviance, absenteeism
(Porath & Pearson, 2012), burnout (Welbourne et al.,
2015), reduced creativity (Porath
& Erez, 2009), and
‘turnover intention’ (Laschinger et al., 2009). That
results in a $50,000 loss to organizations per employee quit from a job in the USA (Sanchez & Levine,
2000). Incivility experience was observed to associate negatively with
‘turnover intention’ among nurses by Dion (2006).
Moreover,
incivility may escalate to more violent behavior
(Andersson & Pearson, 1999) especially the harassment that
prevails in a number of industries
(Einarsen et al., 2011). All of these devastate organizational performance and
profitability. Where, these experiences undermine employee self-confidence and
often their ‘emotional health’ (Randle, 2003).
Likewise,
Hoel et
al., (2007) found incivility experienced by nurses in clinical nurses.
Yet, Gallo (2012) argue that less is
known about nurses’ experience of incivility and its outcomes. However,
high psychological risk can also lead to poor interpersonal relationships at
work (Harvey et al., 2017). While, negative health effects among nurses
such as burnout are well documented (Schaufeli et al., 2009). Incivility has
more deleterious results for employees when they fall in dejection and stumpy
self-respect (Estes & Wang,
2008).
Laschinger et al., (2009) argued incivility has a strong negative impact on employee emotions, by
depleting employee emotional resources leading to burnout that ends at the increased turnover intention. Therefore,
incivility is positively linked by many researchers as a major cause of burnout (e.g., Giumetti et al., 2012; Leiter et
al., 2015) which ultimately leads to raising employee turnover in an organization (Arshadi
& Damiri, 2013).
Similarly,
job stress among employees is conceptualized
as a complex process that consists of three major elements a) source of stress,
b) perception and appraisal of the stressor
by an individual, and c) the emotional
reaction when the stressor becomes a threat (Spielberger et
al., 2003). It was also conceptualized as the misbalance between job demands that employees
are subject to and undesirable experiences that threaten
their well-being (Treven & Potocan, 2005).
As
occupational stress damages individual physical (Van & Kleber,
2003) as well as mental health and well-being (Sarafis et al., 2016). Likewise, stress decreases
concentration, attention, and decision-making skills (Shapiro et
al., 2005). Accordingly, incivility is one
of the chronic reasons as micro-stressors at the workplace (Cortina
et al., 2001). With given complexity of disease
treatment, and uncertainty treating patients, propagation of disease from
patients, while dealing with death and dying people (Stordeur et
al., 2001; Mcvicar, 2003).
This makes healthcare service riskier and stressful for nurses to perform even
routine work and increases incidences of mistakes and practice errors as
reported by Teng
et al. (2010) among 229 nurses in Taiwan.
The
employee begins to develop an adverse
attitude towards job after realizing that
the current conditions of deployment are unmatched with ones’ expectations
(Mano-Negrin & Kirschenbaum, 1999) which definitely defines ones’ intention
to work under any longer or turnover intention. The term ‘turnover intention’
is defined as to how long an individual is willing to stay in the organization
(Cotton & Tuttle, 1986).
Likewise,
other researchers (e.g., Tett & Meyer, 1993) suggested this as the perceived
probability of perception of employees to stay or leave the organization.
Whereas, in nursing turnover among nurses may escalate more severely as to
leave the hospital environment alone (Tai et al., 1998) or to leave the organization or nursing profession completely (Hayes et
al., 2006). Turnover of
an employee is either non-voluntary where the organization itself requires no
further service of that employee.
Or
involuntary when an employee leaves the job. Particularly in nursing, the cost
of turnover per nurse ranges from $22,000 to more than $64,000 in the USA alone (Jones;
Gate, 2007). Nurses’
turnover intention refers to nurses leaving the job (Dam et al., 2011) which
was also reported more than half (53%) among nurses by the American Nurses Association (2010).
Whereas;
the voluntary turnover intention is the intentional decision of an employee to leave
the organization while physical or emotional resources remain intact to perform
or to adjust with the job (Haw & Dickerson, 1998). This turnover intention in the nursing
profession is reflected as the shortfall
for the past many years (Keenan & Kennedy, 2003). Mirrored in W.H.O reports 2006 depicts a global
deficiency of 4.3 million healthcare workers. Moreover, it was suggested to
rise by 20% in the upcoming two decades.
Similarly, Bobbio and Manganelli (2015) therefore argued to tackle turnover
that may help retention.
Hence,
it is not surprising to expect negative incivility experience to increase
employee psychological risk (Harvey et al., 2017), negative
employee career choice (Curtis et al., 2007) which ultimately forces damaging
involuntary results for the organization as employee’s intention to leave
(Cortina et al., 2001). Furthermore, workplace incivility is also associated with job
stress (Day & Leiter, 2014), burnout (Welbourne et
al., 2015), which both
positively raises turnover among employees (Arshadi & Damiri, 2013; Labrague
et al., 2018). It is; therefore, the
influence of ‘workplace incivility’ is necessary to investigate for managerial intervention
through conceptual factors that tackle turnover intention among nurses.
2.
LITERATURE REVIEW AND HYPOTHESIS
2.1.
Workplace Incivility
In other words, ‘workplace
incivility’ is shaped by cultural norms, traditions, and formal or informal
rules. Thus, socially acceptable or unacceptable behaviors may vary among organizations, industries, or countries
(Andersson & Pearson, 1999). Where, communication norms may differ and cultures may increase
misunderstandings as potential disrespect (Pearson & Porath,
2005). Though, ‘workplace incivility’ is underestimated (Cortina et al., 2001). Yet, its
presence is increasing and scholars revealed that it may damage individual,
group, organizational outcomes (Porath
& Pearson, 2013;
Schilpzand et
al., 2016).
Empirically, the ‘workplace
incivility’ is negatively connected with customs of ‘mutual respect’ and
workplace cooperation (Andersson & Pearson, 1999) and effectiveness (Pearson et
al., 2000). Likewise, the mediating relationship of informal climate on
incivility and job satisfaction found to be negative
among nurses in Pakistan (Samad et al., 2020). Besides, Porath and Pearson (2012) indicated the association between ‘workplace
incivility’ and concentrated work efforts, squat performance, job
dissatisfaction, stumpy organizational commitment, and high intended turnover. Thus,
‘workplace incivility’ reflected the organization’s image and repute (Bavik & Bavik, 2015) and negatively impact profitability (Porath & Pearson, 2013).
2.2.
Burnout
Maslach et al. (1996) coined burnout
as a syndrome consisting of ‘emotional exhaustion’; when a person is no longer
able to settle job demands physically or emotionally, professional inefficacy;
when an individual feels low achievement, competence, and productivity, and
cynicism; when employee detaches from a job
based on a negative attitude towards job,
clients, or organization. Burnout captures prolonged exposure to chronic
work-related demands in any occupation (Maslach & Leiter,
2008).
Also, literature reveals negative
outcomes of burnout such as anxiety and depression (Hakanen & Schaufeli, 2012), physical disorders (Armon et al., 2010) and heart
diseases (Toker et al., 2012). Literature revealed the toxic effect of burnout
on ‘physical’ and ‘emotional wellbeing’ that makes burnout a grave
public-health disorder (Bauer & Hämmig,
2014). Besides, the increasing level of burnout let down ‘employee motivation’
and increase ‘dysfunctional attitudes’ and behaviors
(Schaufeli & Buunk, 2004). While, at the organizational level burnout leads to high
‘employee turnover’ (Leiter & Maslach, 2009) which is also a serious fear for any organization.
2.3.
Occupational Stress
Organizational stress model was
proposed by Ivancevich and Matteson (1980) depicted several reasons for
occupational stress. These may include intra-organizational stressors
(environment, role conflicts, workload,
climate, and organizational structure) and extra-organizational stressors
(family relations, economic problems, race, and social
status). Where stress with
negative consequences may range from blood pressure to various behavioral and organizational negative outcomes
such as turnover.
Occupational stress among employees
is often inflicted by excessive rules and lack of participation (Larson, 2004),
lack of social support at workplace (Chandola,
2010), work-over load (De Graaf, 2003), role conflict (Manshor et al., 2003),
working environment (Spreckelmeyer,
1993), and physical stressor such as, lights and ventilation (Thayer et al.,
2010) which ultimately induce turnover among employees (Mor Barak et al., 2001;
Chandola, 2010).
Occupational stress occurs when
there is an imbalance between the demands
or expectations and employee capability to cope
with those (Ullrich & Fitzgerald,
1990). Occupational stress also plays a crucial
role in employee job satisfaction and later commitment towards organizational
goals. Given healthcare is a stressful
profession with long working hours, harsh working conditions, patient and
family dealings, and countless health and safety risks (O'connor et al., 2000).
Whereas, nursing is a high-risk job being
responsible for patient outcomes where nurses play a vital role in healthcare
services and often encountered with critical incidents or acute stressors.
2.4.
Turnover Intention
Employee turnover is the voluntary
withdrawal from the job in any given
organization (Shaw et al., 2005). The decision to leave the job is costly not
only to the employee but also
organization (Lee et al., 2004). For example, ‘employee turnover’ involves
three components when computing the cost, it includes ‘separation cost’,
‘replacement cost’, and ‘training cost’. In the USA
alone, an average ‘employee turnover’ is 15% which varies among organizations (Tai et al., 1998).
From an Asian
perspective, for example, Singapore, HR Asia (2018) reported that: ‘more
than half (56 percent) Singapore finance executives said they have witnessed an
increase in staff resignation in the past three years, with the average turnover
currently staying at 10%. Despite almost all (99 percent) CFOs surveyed
currently have a staff retention program
in their organizations, the majority still expected that employee turnover
will increase over the next 12 months.
Evidence revealed that organizations with high
interpersonal interactional cultures (healthcare) had high turnover rates as
compared to others who don’t have much
work cultures (Sheridan, 1992). Employees
with experiencing work abuse (incivility) were likely to resign voluntarily from a job (Hansen,
1993). As mentioned earlier above, that
experiencing incivility at the workplace leads to burnout that results in
turnover intention among employees.
2.5.
Theoretical Grounding
Hobfoll’s
(1989) ‘conservation of resource’ (COR) theory postulates threat (uncivil behavior) from any source (supervisor,
co-worker) at the workplace would lead to
emotional depletion that leads to burnout
if the subject employee cannot match the
threat with the available emotional
resource. Therefore, the COR theory
supports the hypothesis of this study between workplace incivility and burnout.
Moreover,
workplace incivility works as a micro-stressors (Cortina et al., 2001) as the
stress typically produced whenever an individual perceives a threat or actual loss to employee valued
resources. Whereas, incivility can activate additional loss to emotional
reserves (e.g. dignity, identity, health, and emotional well-being). Therefore,
workplace incivility is documented as a source of stress at work (Nitzsche et al.,
2018).
In
both conditions, COR theory magnifies the impact of incivility that causes
burnout and stress at the workplace that affects one’s job evaluation and eventually increases the intention to change or quit the
job. Thus, hypothesized relationships
(see Figure 1) has been formed by keeping in view the underlying shreds of evidence
in literature.
Figure 1: Hypothesized framework
2.6.
The hypothesis of research:
·
H1:
Workplace incivility positively influences
employee burnout.
·
H2:
Workplace incivility positively influences
employee occupational stress.
·
H3:
Workplace incivility is negatively related to turnover intention.
·
H4:
Workplace incivility is negatively related to burnout.
·
H5:
Occupational stress mediates between workplace incivility and turnover
intention.
3.
METHODOLOGY
3.2.
Measurement
Workplace
incivility was measured through 7-item developed by Cortina et
al. (2001) with a 5-point Likert scale from (1= never to 5= all
the time). Sample items include a statement that shows experience from sources of
‘uncivil behavior’ (e.g. ‘made demeaning
remarks about you’ and ‘put you down or was condescending to you’). For measure
the burnout, Burnout
Measure Short (BMS) of Pines
and Aronson (1988) version with a 10-item construct with 5-point Likert type
scale (1= never, 5= daily). Sample items were: I feel emotionally
drained from my work,” and “I feel I’m working too hard at my job”.
Whereas;
occupational stress is work related perception of employees’ and measured by Perceived
Stress Scale (PSS) with 10-items developed by Cohen
et al. (1983) on 5-point Likert type scale. The turnover intention construct
was measured with 3-items developed by Mobley et al. (1978) with 5-point Likert scale
(1=strongly agree, 5= strongly disagree) and sample items were: ‘I will
probably look for a new job in the next year” had scored highest mean among the
three items’ and “I often think about quitting my
present job”.
4.
ANALYSIS AND RESULTS
The first
phase was a screening of data for any outlier,
missing data, or incomplete responses through SPSS. The screened data analyzed through the partial least square method developed by Wold (1992). PLS-SEM
has gained significant exposure for guesstimating multifarious path models with
latent variables and their connections (Sarstedt et al., 2017). Also,
‘structural equation modeling’ has proved
robust results in the testing and development of theoretical concepts (Hair et al., 2012;
Bashir et al.,
2017).
4.1.
Assessment of Measurement Model
Hair
et al. (2016) recommended assessing measurement model for valid analysis
results that include item reliability: in terms of factor loading (outer
loadings) of individual items in the measurement construct with a value between
0.4 and 0.7 (leguina, 2015), internal consistency: that items of construct
measures the same concept for that Hair et al. (2011) suggested a minimum 0.7 value of composite reliability
(CR), convergent validity: it is the degree of an item to represent the
construct as well as correlate with other construct items with a cut-off value of 0.5 or above suggested by Chin
(1998), and discriminant validity: it is the degree of distinctiveness of one
construct from the other (duarte & raposo, 2010) with hetero-trait-mono-trait
(HTMT) values must be below 0.9 (gold et al., 2001). Below Table 1 reveals measurement model
values that are acceptable while the BO10 item from the burnout measurement
scale was eliminated due to lower factor loadings. Whereas; values in bold
inside small brackets shows (HTMT) acceptable values for the discriminant
validity of the measurement.
Table 1: Cross Loading, Composite Reliability, Average Variance Extracted, HTMT
Construct |
Item |
BO |
OS |
TOI |
WI |
CR |
AVE |
Burnout |
BO1 |
0.68 |
0.423 |
-0.353 |
0.47 |
0.956 |
0.709 |
BO2 |
0.843 |
0.525 |
-0.417 |
0.5 |
|||
BO3 |
0.841 |
0.557 |
-0.399 |
0.5 |
|||
BO4 |
0.854 |
0.439 |
-0.385 |
0.429 |
|||
BO5 |
0.889 |
0.555 |
-0.47 |
0.513 |
|||
BO6 |
0.924 |
0.513 |
-0.474 |
0.508 |
|||
BO7 |
0.862 |
0.417 |
-0.415 |
0.403 |
|||
BO8 |
0.85 |
0.44 |
-0.443 |
0.423 |
|||
BO9 |
0.816 |
0.352 |
-0.409 |
0.308 |
|||
Occupational Stress |
OS1 |
0.299 (0.607) |
0.746 |
-0.345 |
0.51 |
0.92 |
0.564 |
OS2 |
0.325 |
0.77 |
-0.347 |
0.545 |
|||
OS3 |
0.426 |
0.764 |
-0.375 |
0.516 |
|||
OS4 |
0.469 |
0.84 |
-0.421 |
0.598 |
|||
OS5 |
0.413 |
0.791 |
-0.409 |
0.601 |
|||
OS6 |
0.458 |
0.795 |
-0.383 |
0.62 |
|||
OS7 |
0.443 |
0.737 |
-0.323 |
0.552 |
|||
OS8 |
0.506 |
0.635 |
-0.319 |
0.43 |
|||
OS9 |
0.479 |
0.656 |
-0.43 |
0.475 |
|||
Turn Over Intention |
TOI1 |
-0.443 (0.541) |
-0.434 (0.553) |
0.911 |
-0.357 |
||
TOI2 |
-0.427 |
-0.416 |
0.896 |
-0.337 |
0.932 |
0.82 |
|
TOI3 |
-0.48 |
-0.494 |
0.906 |
-0.385 |
|||
Workplace Incivility |
Wi2 |
0.464 (0.569) |
0.639 (0.784) |
-0.37 (0.436) |
0.853 |
0.944 |
0.705 |
Wi3 |
0.444 |
0.587 |
-0.312 |
0.825 |
|||
Wi4 |
0.491 |
0.638 |
-0.346 |
0.849 |
|||
Wi5 |
0.428 |
0.589 |
-0.273 |
0.859 |
|||
Wi6 |
0.496 |
0.636 |
-0.373 |
0.87 |
|||
Wi7 |
0.468 |
0.571 |
-0.319 |
0.806 |
|||
Wi1 |
0.378 |
0.574 |
-0.344 |
0.814 |
|
|
4.2.
Assessment of Structural Model
The research aim was to assess the effect of WI on TOI through BO and OS underpinned on COR theory. The hypothesized relationship(s) was measured using SmartPLS software. The PLS model measures R2, beta values, t-values, the effect size f2, and Q2 on 5000 samples resampling by the bootstrapping process in Smart-PLS following the Hair et al. (2014) recommendations (see Figure 2).
Figure 2: Structural Model
The results depicted in Table 2 shows that workplace incivility has positive significant relationship with burnout (β= 0.541, t= 11.38, p <0.001) under lower and upper limit of confidence interval [LL=0.456, UP= 0.632], and occupational stress (β= 0.722, t= 16.197, p<0.001) with (LL= 0.626, UL= 0.803) supporting H1 and H2. While, an insignificant relation with turnover intention (β= 0.007, t= 0.069, p> 0.05) with [LL= -0.2, UL= 0.195] not supporting H3. Whereas, workplace incivility has negative significant relation with turnover intention through mediation of burnout (β= -0.174, t= 4.383, p< 0.001, LL= -0.255, UL=-0.1) and occupational stress (β= -0.232, t= 3.169, p< 0.05, LL= -0.367, UL=-0.083) which shows support for H4.
Table 2: Structural Model Assessment
Path |
Beta |
St. Dev |
T value |
LL |
UL |
P Values |
BO -> TOI |
-0.322 |
0.069 |
4.637 |
-0.455 |
-0.183 |
0.000 |
OS -> TOI |
-0.321 |
0.1 |
3.21 |
-0.511 |
-0.108 |
0.001 |
WI -> BO |
0.541 |
0.048 |
11.38 |
0.456 |
0.632 |
0.000 |
WI -> OS |
0.722 |
0.045 |
16.197 |
0.626 |
0.803 |
0.000 |
WI -> TOI |
0.007 |
0.101 |
0.069 |
-0.2 |
0.195 |
0.945 |
Indirect Effect |
||||||
WI -> BO -> TOI |
-0.174 |
0.04 |
4.383 |
-0.255 |
-0.1 |
0.000 |
WI -> OS -> TOI |
-0.232 |
0.073 |
3.169 |
-0.367 |
-0.083 |
0.002 |
Hair et al. (2014) suggested evaluating the change in R2 values to find the effect size. Finally, the R2 value for burnout is 0.293, occupational stress is 0.521, and turnover intention is 0.318. Workplace incivility effect size on burnout is 0.414 on occupational stress is 1.089 and turnover intention is 0. Whereas; f2 values of burnout are 0.098, and of occupational stress is 0.066 on turnover intention.
These effect sizes according to Cohen (1988) guidelines support the hypothesis except the direct effect of workplace incivility on turnover intention. Finally, model predictiveness was assessed by Q2 values through a blindfolding procedure as suggested by Hair et al. (2014). The Q2 values for burnout are 0.189, occupational stress is 0.273, and for turnover intention is 0.238 which suggests that the model has sufficient predictive relevance.
The structural model results show the insignificant effect between direct effects of workplace incivility and turnover intention. This seems to serve one of the main objectives of this study of evaluating the indirect effect of workplace incivility on turnover intention. These results are also in line with Cingöz and Kaplan (2015), Dahri and Hamid (2018), and Alola et al. (2019) who also found insignificant direct relation between workplace incivility and other different variables.
For instance, Andersson and Pearson (1999) found workplace incivility is the harmful yet subtle and ambiguous intention that directly affects the mental and emotional state of individual and reaction is also indirect which supports the results of this study. This argument is reflected in results as a higher significant positive increase in burnout and occupational stress due to workplace incivility. Though less, yet reflected also an increase in turnover intention indirectly rather in a direct relationship.
5.1.
Conclusion
One
of the grounding assumptions of COR theory is that an uncivil act observed or
experienced by an individual will induce subtle or internal accumulation of
negative feelings or energy. This negativity results in adverse organizational
outcomes. These assumptions were tested in the healthcare sector and were found
valid as per COR theory. For instance, the effect of incivility experienced by
an employee leads to emotional burnout as well as increases occupational
stress.
This result induces turnover intention among healthcare sector employees. One of the assumptions of this study was the direct effect of incivility and an extension of basic COR theory assumptions as H3. This hypothesis was found insignificant. Indicating that there is no direct effect of incivility on turnover intention. This reaffirms the indirect negative impact on non-favored organizational attitudes revealed by employees at a later stage. Thus, extending the boundaries of existing COR theory. Therefore, the results of this study affirm the negative influence of incivility through burnout and occupational stress on employee turnover intention in healthcare sector organizations.
5.2.
Implications
This study unearthed the facts that are
immensely important to HR managers and nurse supervisors that how subtle
uncivil acts at the workplace may end up
in more deleterious events mentally, emotionally, financially, and in terms of
deprived service quality and workforce deficiency. Indeed, uncivil behavior was observed in many local context
studies (e.g., Bibi et
al., 2013; Laeeque et al., 2018) which affected nurses mentally,
physically, and emotionally. This also increased the shortage of nursing staff globally (Oulton, 2006) as well as in Pakistan
(Nizar & Chagani, 2016).
Whereas; authors urged for further explorations to develop interventional policies in this regard. In this regard, this study explored relations between workplace incivility that increased turnover intention through burnout and occupational stress among nurses in public healthcare facilities. Through results of this study scholars and stakeholders are enlightened towards deeper mental and emotional devastation due to incivility at the workplace. This also helps HR managers, policymakers, and executives or supervisors to maintain civility in public hospital ambiance and intervention for reducing turnover intention among nurses and patient satisfaction through quality services.
5.3.
Future Direction
5.4.
Limitation
This study deployed simple random sampling which however advantageous to avoid biases. Even though, common method biases may occur due to a single source may flatter analyses results. Scholars may capitalize on these shortfalls. Further, more rigorous sampling technique such as stratifies sampling may be utilized for more inclusive results. As cross-sectional studies are good to know the current situation yet lack chronic approach and responses may be affected by other excluded variable with respect to a different context that may have affected respondents’ responses. To overcome this limitation researchers may benefit from a longitudinal approach. By overcoming these limitations will enable neat and generalizable results.
REFERENCES
Adib-Hajbaghery,
M., Khamechian, M., & Alavi, N. M. (2012).
Nurses’ perception of occupational stress and its influencing factors: A
qualitative study. Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery
research, 17(5),
352.
Alola, U.
V., Olugbade, O. A., Avci, T., & Öztüren, A. (2019). Customer incivility and employees' outcomes in the
hotel: Testing the mediating role of emotional exhaustion. Tourism
Management Perspectives, 29,
9-17.
American Nurses Association. (2010). The nurse’s role in ethics and human rights: Protecting and
promoting individual worth, dignity, and human rights in practice
settings. Silver Spring, MD:
Nursebooks. org.
Andersson, L. M., & Pearson, C. M. (1999). Tit for tat? The
spiraling effect of
incivility in the workplace. Academy of
management review, 24(3), 452-
471.
Anjazab,
B., & Farnia, F. (2002). The relationship between job stress and
behavioural and mental responses of obstetricians in Yazd public
hospitals. The Journal of Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, 10, 32-8.
Arshadi,
N., Damiri, H. (2013). The relationship of job stress with turnover intention
and job performance: Moderating role of OBSE. Procedia-Social
and Behavioral Sciences, 84,
706-710.
Bashir,
S., Syed, S., & Qureshi, J. A. (2017). Philosophical and methodological
aspects of mixed-methods research: A review of the academic literature. Journal
of Independent Studies and Research, 15(1), 32-50.
Bauer, G.
F., & Hämmig, O. (2014). Bridging
occupational, organizational and public health: A transdisciplinary
approach. In bridging
occupational, organizational and public health (1-11). Springer,
Dordrecht.
Bavik,
A., & Bavik, Y. L. (2015). Effect of employee incivility on customer
retaliation through psychological contract breach: The moderating role of moral
identity. International journal of hospitality management, 50, 66-76.
Bibi, Z., Karim, J., & Ud
Din, S. (2013). Workplace incivility and counterproductive work behavior:
Moderating role of emotional intelligence. Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research,
28(2).
Boamah,
S. A., & Laschinger, H. (2016). The influence of areas of worklife fit and
work‐life
interference on burnout and turnover intentions among new graduate nurses. Journal of Nursing Management, 24(2), E164-E174.
Bobbio,
A., & Manganelli, A. M. (2015).
Antecedents of hospital nurses’ intention to leave the organization: A cross
sectional survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 52(7), 1180-1192.
Çelik,
M., Turunç, Ö., & Begenirbaş, M. (2011). The role of organizational
trust, Burnout and interpersonal deviance for achieving organizational
performance. International Journal of Business and
Management Studies, 3(2),
179-189.
Cingöz,
A., & Kaplan, A. (2015). The effect
of workplace incivility on job satisfaction and organizational trust: A
study of industrial enterprises in turkey. In WEI International Academic Conference Proceedings, Vienna, Austria (12-15).
Cortina,
L. M., Magley, V. J., Williams, J. H., Langhout, R. D. (2001). Incivility in
the workplace: incidence and impact. Journal of occupational health psychology, 6(1), 64.
Cortina, L. M., & Magley, V. J. (2009). Patterns and profiles of
response to
incivility in the workplace. Journal of occupational health psychology,
14(3), 272.
Chandola, T. (2010). Stress at Work: A Report Prepared for
the British Academy. [Brochure]. London: The British Academy
Cotton,
J. L., & Tuttle, J. M. (1986). Employee turnover: A meta-analysis and
review with implications for research. Academy of management Review, 11(1), 55-70.
Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least
squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern methods for business
research, 295(2),
295-336.
Cohen,
S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived
stress. Journal of health and social behavior, 385-396.
Curtis,
J., Bowen, I., & Reid, A. (2007). You have no credibility: Nursing
students’ experiences of horizontal violence. Nurse education in practice, 7(3), 156-163.
Dahri, A.
S., & Ab Hamid, K. (2018).
Effect of Workplace Incivility on Job Satisfaction Among Nurses: Mediating Role
of Emotional Exhaustion. The Journal of Social Sciences Research,
80-90.
Day, A.,
& Leiter, M. P. (2014). The good and bad of working relationships:
Implications for burnout. In Burnout
at work (64-87). Psychology
Press.
De Graaf,
J. (Ed.). (2003). Take back your time: Fighting overwork
and time poverty in America, San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Dion, M. J. (2006). The impact of workplace incivility and occupational stress on the job
satisfaction and turnover intention of acute care nurses.
Duarte,
P. A. O., & Raposo, M. L. B.
(2010). A PLS model to study brand
preference: An application to the mobile phone market. In Handbook of partial least squares (449-485).
Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Estes,
B., & Wang, J. (2008). Integrative literature review: Workplace incivility:
Impacts on individual and organizational performance. Human Resource Development
Review, 7(2),
218-240.
Espnes, G. A., & Byrne, D. G. (2008)
Occupational stress and cardiovascular disease. Stress Health. 24, 231-8.
Gallo, V. J. (2012). Incivility in nursing
education: A review of the literature. Teaching and learning in
Nursing, 7(2),
62-66.
Gandham, S. R. (2000).
Occupational stress: Time for a policy. The
Health & Safety Practitioner, 18, 20-1
Giumetti,
G. W., Mckibben, E. S., Hatfield, A. L., Schroeder, A. N., & Kowalski, R.
M. (2012). Cyber incivility@ work: The new age of interpersonal deviance. Cyberpsychology,
Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(3), 148-154.
Gold, A. H., & Arvind Malhotra, A. H. S. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities
perspective. J. Manag. Inf. Syst.,
18(1), 185–214.
Golubic, R., Milosevic, M., Knezevic, B., &
Mustajbegovic, J. (2009). Work‐related stress, education and work ability among hospital
nurses. Journal of advanced nursing, 65(10), 2056-2066.
Harvey,
S. B., Modini, M., Joyce, S., Milligan-Saville, J. S., Tan, L., Mykletun, A.,
& Mitchell, P. B. (2017). Can work make you mentally
ill? A systematic meta-review of work-related risk factors for common mental
health problems. Occup Environ Med., 74(4), 301-310.
Hair, J.
F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver
bullet. Journal of Marketing theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152.
Hair, J.
F., Sarstedt, M., Pieper, T. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2012). The use of partial
least squares structural equation modeling in strategic management research: a
review of past practices and recommendations for future applications. Long
range planning, 45(5-6),
320-340.
Hair, Jr,
J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A
primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications.
Hair, Jr, J. F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M.
(2014). A Primer on Partial Least
Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publication, Los
Angeles.
Hakanen,
J. J., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2012). Do burnout and work engagement predict
depressive symptoms and life satisfaction? A three-wave seven-year prospective
study. Journal of affective disorders, 141(2-3), 415-424.
Haw, J.,
& Dickerson, M. (1998). The effects of distraction on desensitization and
reprocessing. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36(7-8), 765-769.
Hayes, L.
J., Orchard, C. A., Hall, L. M., Nincic, V., O'brien-Pallas, L., & Andrews,
G. (2006). Career intentions of nursing students and new nurse graduates: a
review of the literature. International Journal of Nursing Education
Scholarship, 3(1).
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion
for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation
modeling. J. Acad. Mark. Sci.,
43(1), 115–135
Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of
resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American psychologist, 44(3), 513.
Hoel, H.,
Giga, S. I., & Davidson, M. J. (2007). Expectations and realities of
student nurses' experiences of negative behaviour and bullying in clinical
placement and the influences of socialization processes. Health
Services Management Research, 20(4), 270-278.
Hurst, T. E., & Hurst, M. M.
(1997) Gender differences in mediation of severe occupational stress
among correctional officers. Am J Crim
Justice. 22, 121-37.
HR Asia (July, 14
2018) Increasing Turnover Rates:
Thousands Finance Workers to Change Jobs in 2018. Retrieved from http://www.hrinasia.com/recruitment/increasing-turnover-rates-thousands-finance-workers-to-change-jobs-in-2018/
on march, 14 2019.
Ivancevich, J. M., & Matteson, M. T. (1980). Stress and work. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman
Jones, C.
B., & Gates, M. (2007). The costs and benefits of nurse turnover: A
business case for nurse retention. The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 12(3).
Katz, D. (1964) The motivational basis of organizational behavior. Behav Sci., 9:131–46.
Keenan, J. F., Kennedy, R. V., & Cote, D. (2003). U.S. Patent No. 6,589,057. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
King, K. A., Vidourek, R., & Schwiebert, M. (2009) Disordered eating and job stress among nurses. J Nurs Manag., 17, 861-9.
Labrague, L. J., Gloe, D., Mcenroe, D. M., Konstantinos, K., & Colet, P. (2018). Factors influencing turnover intention among registered nurses in Samar Philippines. Applied Nursing Research, 39, 200-206.
Laeeque, S. H., Bilal, A., Hafeez, A., & Khan, Z. (2018). Violence breeds violence: burnout as a mediator between patient violence and nurse 204 violence. International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics, (just-accepted), 1-31.
Larson, L. L. (2004). Internal Auditors and Job Stress. Managerial Auditing Journal. 19(9), 1119–1130.
Lee, T. W., Mitchell, T. R., Sablynski, C. J., Burton, J. P., & Holtom, B. C. (2004). The effects of job embeddedness on organizational citizenship, job performance, volitional absences, and voluntary turnover. Academy of Management journal, 47(5), 711-722.
Leiter, M. P., & Maslach, C. (2009). Nurse turnover: the mediating role of burnout. Journal of nursing management, 17(3), 331-339.
Leiter, M. P., Day, A., & Price, L. (2015). Attachment styles at work: Measurement, collegial relationships, and burnout. Burnout Research, 2(1), 25-35.
Lewis, P.
S., & Malecha, A. (2011). The impact of workplace incivility on the work
environment, manager skill, and productivity. Journal of Nursing
Administration, 41(1),
41-47.
Leguina,
A. (2015). A primer on partial least
squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM).
Samad, A., Memon, S. B., & Kumar, M. (2020). Job satisfaction among nurses in Pakistan: The impact of incivility and informal climate. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 39(4), 53-59.
Taap Manshor, A., Fontaine, R., & Siong Choy, C. (2003). Occupational stress among managers: a Malaysian survey. Journal of managerial psychology, 18(6), 622-628.
Mano-Negrin, R., & Kirschenbaum, A. (1999). Push and pull factors in medical employees' turnover decisions: The effect of a careerist approach and organizational benefits on the decision to leave the job. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 10(4), 689-702.
Maslach, C., Jackson, S. E., & Leiter, M. P. (1996). Maslach burnout inventory manual. Mountain View. California: CPP.
Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (2008). The truth about burnout: How organizations cause personal stress and what to do about it. John Wiley & Sons.
Mcgowan, B. (2001). Self-reported stress and its effects on nurses. Nursing Standard (through 2013), 15(42), 33.
Mcvicar, A. (2003). Workplace stress in nursing: a literature review. Journal of advanced nursing, 44(6), 633-642.
Mor Barak, M. E., Nissly, J. A., & Levin, A. (2001). Antecedents to Retention and Turnover Among Child Welfare, Social Work, and Other Human Service Employees: What Can We Learn From Past Research? A Review and Meta-analysis. Social Service Review. 75(4), 625–662.
Mobley, W. H., Horner, S. O., & Hollingsworth, A. T. (1978). An evaluation of precursors of hospital employee turnover. Journal of Applied psychology, 63(4), 408.
Nizar, H., & Chagani, P. (2016). Analysis of health care delivery system in Pakistan and Singapore. International Journal of Nursing, 8(2).
Nitzsche, M., Ribeiro, L., & Laneiro, T. (2018). Workplace incivility among Portuguese hotel employees: Is lack of respect burning them out? Journal of Spatial and Organizational Dynamics, 6(1), 52-71.
O'connor. B., Rory C. O'connor., Barbara L. White., Peter E., & Bundred D. (2000). The effect of job strain on British general practitioners' mental health. Journal of Mental Health, 9(6), 637-654.
Oulton, J. A. (2006). The global nursing shortage: an overview of issues and actions. Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice, 7(3_suppl), 34S-39S.
Pearson, C. M., Andersson, L. M., & Porath, C. L. (2000). Assessing and attacking workplace incivility. Organizational dynamics, 29(2), 123-137.
Pines, A., & Aronson, E. (1988). Career burnout: Causes and cures. Free press.
Porath, C. L., Pearson, C. M. (2012). Emotional and behavioral responses to workplace incivility and the impact of hierarchical status. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42, E326-E357.
Porath, C., & Pearson, C. (2013). The price of incivility. Harvard business review, 91(1-2), 115-121.Porath, C. L., & Erez, A. (2009). Overlooked but not untouched: How rudeness reduces onlookers’ performance on routine and creative tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109(1), 29-44.
Purcell Sr., Kutash M., & Cobb S. (2011) The relationship between nurses’ stress and nurse staffing factors in a hospital setting. J Nurs Manag., 19, 714-20
Reynolds, S. (1997). Psychological well-being at work: is prevention better than cure? Journal of psychosomatic research, 43(1), 93-102.
Sanchez, J. I., & Levine, E. L. (2000). Accuracy or consequential validity: which is the better standard for job analysis data?. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 21(7), 809-818.
Sarafis, P., Rousaki, E., Tsounis, A., Malliarou, M., Lahana, L., Bamidis, P., & Papastavrou, E. (2016). The impact of occupational stress on nurses’ caring behaviors and their health related quality of life. BMC nursing, 15(1), 56.
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2017). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. Handbook of market research, 1-40.
Schaufeli, W. B., & Buunk, B. P. (2004). Burnout: An overview of 25 years of research and theorizing. In M. J. Schabracq, J. A. M. Winnubst., C. L. Cooper (Eds.), The handbook of work and health psychology (2nd ed., 383–425). Chichester, UK: Wiley. doi: 10.1002/0470013400.ch19
Schmitz, N., Neumann, W., & Oppermann, R. (2000). Stress, burnout and locus of control in German nurses. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 37(2), 95-99.
Shapiro, S. L., Astin, J. A., Bishop, S. R., & Cordova, M. (2005). Mindfulness-based stress reduction for health care professionals: results from a randomized trial. International journal of stress management, 12(2), 164.
Spielberger, C. D., Vagg, P. R., & Wasala, C. F. (2003). Occupational stress: Job pressures and lack of support.
Spreckelmeyer, K. F. (1993). Office Relocation and Environmental Change: A Case Study. Environment and Behavior Journal, 25(2): 181–204.
Stordeur, S., D'hoore, W., & Vandenberghe, C. (2001). Leadership, organizational stress, and emotional exhaustion among hospital nursing staff. Journal of advanced nursing, 35(4), 533-542.
Tai, T. W. C., Bame, S. I., & Robinson, C. D. (1998). Review of nursing turnover research, 1977–1996. Social science & medicine, 47(12), 1905-1924.
Tett, R. P., & Meyer, J. P. (1993). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: path analyses based on meta‐analytic findings. Personnel psychology, 46(2), 259-293.
Teng, C. I., Hsiao, F. J., & Chou, T. A. (2010). Nurse‐perceived time pressure and patient‐perceived care quality. Journal of Nursing Management, 18(3), 275-284.
Thayer, J. F., Verkuil, B., Brosschot, J. F., Kampschroer, K., West, A., Sterling, C., Christie, I.C., Abernethy, D., Sollers, J. J., Cizza, G., Marques, A. H., & Sternberg, E. M. (2010). Effects of the Physical Work Environment on Physiological Measures of Stress. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil., 17(4): 431–439.
Toker, S., Melamed, S., Berliner, S., Zeltser, D., & Shapira, I. (2012). Burnout and risk of coronary heart disease: a prospective study of 8838 employees. Psychosomatic Medicine, 74(8), 840-847.
Treven, S., & Potocan, V. (2005). Training programmes for stress management in small businesses. Education+ Training, 47(8/9), 640-652.
Ullrich, A., & Fitzgerald, P. (1990). Stress experienced by physicians and nurses in the cancer ward. Social Science & Medicine, 31(9), 1013-1022.
Van Dam, K., Meewis, M., & Van Der Heijden, B. I. (2013). Securing intensive care: towards a better understanding of intensive care nurses’ perceived work pressure and turnover intention. Journal of advanced nursing, 69(1), 31-40.
Van Der Ploeg E., & Kleber R. J. (2003) Acute and chronic job stressors among ambulance personnel: predictors of health symptoms. Occup Environ Med., 60, 40-6.
Welbourne, J. L., Gangadharan, A., &Sariol, A. M. (2015). Ethnicity and cultural values as predictors of the occurrence and impact of experienced workplace incivility. Journal of occupational health psychology, 20(2), 205.
Wold, S. (1993). Discussion: PLS in
chemical practice. Technometrics, 35(2), 136-139.