Rogeane Morais
Ribeiro
Faculdade
Luciano Feijão, UNIVALI, Brazil
E-mail: rogeanemorais@yahoo.com.br
Ruan Carlos dos
Santos
Centro
Universitário UniAvan, UNIVALI, Brazil
E-mail: ruan_santos1984@hotmail.com
Maria do Socorro
Silva Mesquita
Universidade do
Ceará-UFC, Faculdade Ari de Sá, Brazil
E-mail: socorromesquita@yahoo.com.br
Cristiane Saboia
Barros
Instituto
Federal doCeará (IFCE), UNIVATES, Brazil
E-mail: cristianesaboia@hotmail.com
Submission: 12/29/2019
Revision: 2/2/2020
Accept: 2/12/2020
ABSTRACT
The present research aims to understand the feasibility of developing a multidimensional model of performance evaluation for organizational control in companies through ethnographic research. Thus, a bibliographic analysis of the studies presented in the four main events of the Brazilian organizational studies – the Colloquium of Epistemology and Sociology of Administration Science, CBEO, EnANPAD and EnEO - and in the research bases SPELL and EBSCO. The measurement of performance in a company has become a relevant subject for both academic research and practical application, because organizational control of organizational control serves to evaluate and improve the various organizational processes to establish goals and achieve performance standards that become competitive in the market. Given this context, we can see that there is a vast possibility of development in this field, through an ethnographic research, through an investigation capable of showing practices, people, groups, cultures and networks of social relations that participate differently from the tourist market, since the environment in which companies are increasingly turbulent and unstable, and decision makers are constantly seeking methods to achieve improvements in organizational performance. In this sense, it is concluded that this research offers theoretical information that can help in future studies that seek to develop a multidimensional model of indicators, besides being a source of data on the diversity of organizational indicators.
Keywords: Multidimensional; Hospitality; Performance
1.
INTRODUCTION
The studies on performance evaluation have been
presented relevant and companies of any segment constantly seek to adapt to the
current paths that the market presents with the intense changes
and high competitiveness, demanding
a higher level
of efficiency and effectiveness. In this context, the
emergence in recent decades of new trends has been observed, and the tourism
sector has experienced continuous expansion and diversification, becoming one
of the
fastest growing global
economic sectors, promoting
technological innovation, and providing new markets and employment
opportunities.
The investigations by Alves (2013), UNWTO (2012),
and UNWTO (2013) show that the activities measured by the total international
landings demonstrate the vigor of this growth. Considering that the year 2016
was decisive for tourism, a year of growth above the average, even with many
challenges reached 1,200 million and according to estimates the number of tourists
coming from other countries should reach 1,600 million of passengers until the
year 2020, and that growth has
accompanied the dignity
that the tourism
segment must firmly
commit (UNWTO, 2012; UNWTO, 2013).
In this vision, it is perceived that the hotel
industry is immersed in a highly competitive environment and
needs accurate and
reliable information for
the proper management
of activities. Hotel companies, like any other firm and any segment, can
apply indicators in order to produce information for the decision-making
process of their managers, seeking to develop the performance of the business.
However, little is known about tourism management, mainly in hotel companies,
which aligns the need to expand knowledge about the management context and
performance of companies in that sector (PAVLATOS; PAGGIOS, 2009).
In the last three decades, a growing academic
interest has been detected aimed at measuring performance in the hotel network.
Although it is a subject of great acceptance in the field of research, it is
perceived that the concept of tourism performance is not totally structured,
the performance of organizations, regardless of the segment, remains one of the
most popular concepts in organizational research (MILLER; WASHBURN; GLICK,
2013).
In the same line of thinking we have Sainaghi
(2010); Sainaghi, Phillips and Corti, (2013); Cheng and Coyte (2014); Phillips
and Moutinho (2014), and Sainaghi et al. (2017) that relate the existence of a
positive relationship in the integration of performance indicators and global
business strategy, including a wide range of measures, but that must
necessarily include financial and non-financial metrics, as well as in the
vision Sainaghi et to the (2013) in tourism, the construction of performance
measures must be multidimensional. Affirming that performance measures continue
to be one of the most critical activities for researchers interested in tourism
management. From the presented presentation, it is intended to understand the
viability of the development of a multidimensional performance evaluation model
for organizational control in companies of the hotel segment through
ethnographic research.
Within the framework of the introductory
contextualization and the objective, the vision of Jaime Jr. (2003) is
presented, where he points out that ethnography can lead to deepening knowledge
about organizational reality, but Cavedón (2014) emphasizes the relevance of
sociological bases that sustain the application of the ethnographic perspective
in organizational studies. In the field of tourism, ethnographic research would
be appropriate, since the researcher
participates in the
daily life of individuals
over an extended period, observing and witnessing
accessible information to deeply visualize the topics that were chosen to study
(HAMMERSLEY; ATKINSON, 1994).
With focus on the objective of the study, after
this contextualization, the ethnographic method is presented in the study of
tourism, organizational performance and ethnographic perspectives and final
considerations.
2.
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1.
Reflective attributes for the ethnographic study
Ethnography is a form of social research that
has the following main characteristics: i) Strong emphasis on the exploration
of the nature of a given social phenomenon (instead of testing hypotheses
about that phenomenon);
ii) use, mainly, of unstructured data;
iii) the detailed investigation of a single case or a small number of
cases; iv) data collection with individuals and / or groups; and v) Analysis of
data, usually concomitant with its collection, which implies interpretation of
the meaning of human actions, generating descriptions and explanations as the
main final product, although it may still have statistical analyzes acting as a
coadjutant (ATKINSON; HAMMERSLEY, 1994;
FETTERMAN, 2010). For Brewer
(2004) the methods to be used in an ethnographic study must allow the
researcher access to the activities of the individuals of the group, and the
techniques include: interviews, discourse analysis, documentary analysis and
participant observation
Ethnography seeks to describe in detail, by
themes or perspectives, a culture or a social group that shares the same
culture, where the researcher examines people in their natural habitat, using
methods to capture their social meanings and routine activities, seeking to
detect patterns of behavior, customs, and general ways of life, interpreting
that group in relation to the meanings of social interactions and
generalizations about social life (BREWER, 2004).
Ethnography is based on the assumption that
each social group is different and, in order to study such differences, the
researcher must engage with the group in their own space (JUPP, 2006).
Therefore, ethnographic studies are conducted to satisfy three simultaneous
needs related to the study of human activities: (i) the need for an empirical
approach, since the phenomenon to be studied should not be inferred, requiring
empirical responsibility; (ii) the researcher's need to remain open to elements
that cannot be coded during the study; and (iii) a union by the phenomenon
observed in the field (BASZANGER; DODIER, 1997).
In the case of ethnography, ethnography is
strongly associated with its own philosophical framework, called naturalism,
which is concerned with the study of social life in the place where it actually
occurs, since it happens independently of experimental manipulation. Vergara
(2008), an ethnographic study allows the researcher to understand in a broader
way how individuals act in a certain environment, which can be an organization,
a society, or a group that shares cultures and subcultures. This type of
research also makes it possible to identify the characteristics, values and
symbolisms of these groups of individuals studied.
In the case of ethnographic research they have
mainly contributed to the refinement of qualitative research in tourism, to the
extent that they enable a better understanding of the dynamic, procedural and
systemic nature of the activity, helping to understand models that differ from
the Aegean of the tourist market.
Such research covers Western and non-Western
contexts, urban and rural, traditional and modern, producing a diversity of
views on places and tourist practices. (...) the anthropologists also carried
out participant research among Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Laotian, Indonesian,
Indian, Indian, Brazilian, Mexican and Middle Eastern tourists, both in
national and international trips "(GRABURN, 2009, p. 14).
Ethnography can be used as a methodological
option that goes against dehumanized, superficial and sterile research models,
transforming itself into a tool of cultural relativization, insofar as it
studies the facts in its own context, starting from the point of reference (in
the case of women). In addition, it can also contribute to the understanding of
the material and symbolic elements that involve the forms of manipulation and
resistance; as well as contrasts, conflicts and asymmetries in the interior of
the tourist activity. The method
“[...] it deepens
the relativization of
cultural points of
view, of the reciprocal relationships
inherent to each
group and of
the strategic differences of
decision of the actors, as well as
making it possible to consider the
non-rational character of a large part of the behaviors in the societies and of
the groups and institutions involved” (SANTANA, 2009, p. 22-23).
In this sense, the field work of ethnography
in the evolution of tourism makes it possible to see people, experiences,
social networks and exchange systems, which go unnoticed from far away and
outside of other methodological models, also becoming a means of give voice to
the native populations that make viable and lead the tourist development in
their territories (LEAL, 2010).
In studies linked to tourist travel, for
example, the ethnographic perspective can give visibility to spaces of
transitory circulation that temporarily accommodate those in transit,
transforming interiors of means of transport, gas stations, accommodation
facilities, roads and airports in important research spaces, which is inserted
in what Augé (2007) calls cultural analysis, where such research can privilege
the earlier, the during and the later of the trip and, according to the
objectives of the research, work with different instruments of data collection.
2.2.
The Ethnographic Method in the Tourism Study
Leal (2010), Pinto and Pereiro (2010) report
that the first studies relating anthropology and tourism began in 1960, where
they verified the impacts caused in the relationship between the former
colonies of the Caribbean, Africa and Asia under the influence of the centers
water generators tourist flows, based on this, ethnographic research
contributes to the systematization of qualitative research in tourism, broadening
the understanding of the natural and of the process, reviving diverse views on
local and tourist practices.
In this context, research on financial,
operational and sociocultural processes appear in various areas in interaction
with the tourism segment, such as Geography, Anthropology, Sociology,
Psychology, but it can be considered that in the Administration these
investigations find and are quite present, because it is considered that this
area contributes in several aspects in congruence with different issues.
Tourism planning is historically demarcated by theories and practices of the
administration area involving future scenarios based on world market trends
(BARRETTO, 2003).
Globalization
appears as a
specific term of
culture, which refers
to referring to cultural transitions worldwide. When describing the
socio-cultural changes of tourism in the receiving localities, the process of
cultural globalization cannot be ignored, that is, placing all the blame for
socio-cultural transformations on tourism without reflecting on this situation
in the globalized world (ORTIZ, 2000, p. 78).
To
understand the organizational phenomena
it is necessary
to overcome the knowledge to understand the horizon of
the ways in which social actions are developed, where in the vision of
Magallanes and Santos (2016) they can be considered as the communication
between the mediator and the formator of lived experiences. socially. In the
social sciences, phenomenology, previously synonymous with anything other than
positivism, achieved greater conceptual and methodological rigor (REMENYI et
al., 1998; EMBREE, 2001).
The importance of ethnography lies in its
complexity, which makes it possible to know and update theories insofar as they
are observed in practice, and this possibility is marked by the immersion of
the research field, since the researcher lives the sociocultural routine and
can analyze in detail the practical relationships and social interactions that
occur in the daily research (GEERTZ, 1978).
In this way, we can consider tourism as a
complex social phenomenon with the
capacity to produce profound social changes in diverse organizations and
societies, being difficult to understand
tourism and social
research distant from
modern societies, as the
complexity of the tourist phenomenon makes it based in interrelations, and
thus, it can be observed to obtain the necessary knowledge about tourism
(TEDLOCK, 2000).
Ethnographic research involves the description
of the events and interactions that occur in the life of a group, being able to
focus on different types of civilizations, communities and organizations
(GODOY, 1995).
Tourism studies currently encompasses a
multiplicity of thematic areas, being little evolved and considered a broad
field for research. Ricthie and Ritchie (2002) consider that tourism research
is used inefficiently and rarely exploited to its full potential. Ethnography
is being discovered as a theoretical approach that broadens the understanding
of the dynamics of activity in tourism studies (PIOLA; KUSHANO, 2018). The
ethnographic description is shown as a comprehensive theoretical approach to
tourism, allowing the delineation of a comprehensive methodological model of
tourism systems, overcoming the reductionist visions that limit its multiple dimensions
and consequences (PINTO; PEREIRO, 2010).
2.3.
Organizational performance and ethnographic
perspectives
In the approach of ethnography to
organizational studies, it is important to point out that in the vision of
Godoy (1995) ethnography goes beyond the technique where construction takes
place in loco, since it establishes relationships for a better understanding of
the complexity of social phenomena. The issue of organizational performance has
been presented with great relevance in social science research and even that
empirical studies have not succeeded in advancing in a universal theory or
concept authors Cameron and Whetten (1983), Lewin and Minton (1986) affirm that
, the issue of organizational effectiveness has served as a unifying theme for
more than a century.
In this sense, the vision of Geertz (1978),
affirming the importance of ethnography is based on its complexity, which
allows updating the theories to the extent that they are observed in practice,
being the case of performance evaluation (organizational studies ), one of the
topics (in the case of women). But the authors emphasize that this relationship
is not exhaustive, but seeks to encourage researchers in organizational fields
and acquire an ethnographic position in their studies. The conception of the
thematic field of study is considered as singular moments, therefore the
routine refers to
the social totality,
enabling these experiences to
build the ethnographic context,
where the researcher's and
researched's vision is constantly questioned (ANDION; SERVA, 2006, p. 56).
Ethnography is based on the immersion of the
research field, where the researcher participates, lives and can normally be
affected by daily customs and local socio-cultural functionality, making it possible
to obtain detailed and organized data on social practices and interactions that
enrich the study. In that sense, the scientific studies related to the
organizational performance issue do not see presenting difference in the
several researches pointed out. Kaplan and Norton (1992) defend as a system
adopted by the organization that strongly affects the behavior of executives
and officials and that managers want a balanced presentation of both financial
and operational indicators.
Following the perspectives of ethnographic
research we have a conceptualization for performance evaluation, which in the
vision of Sainaghi and Baggio (2016) the organizational performance is seen as
a network, a complex system.
In addition, ethnography allows the researcher
investigate a large number of people, even more than when using ethnography.
Therefore, it can be said that ethnography helps society to better understand
society and the evolutionary behavior of tourism. On the other hand, compared
to ethnography, tourism research is restricted to online communities, while
ethnography can focus on the whole of human society (KOZINETS, 2012). While,
ethnography comprises research on all forms of human communication, including
body language and tone of voice (BARTL et al., 2016), tourism finds its
advancement in information technology in real time in supported online content,
which is mainly textual communication, including some features elements.
This concept goes to meet the thinking of
Andion and Serva (2006), when they argue that in organizational studies,
networks have been the object of many studies, taking into account that in
several cases organizational networks are attributed a sense of innovation in
the sphere of civil society, of the market or of the State, because it provides
necessary information for decision making, as well as the possibility of a
competitive advantage in continuous operations.
3.
METHODOLOGICAL ASPECTS
In order to meet the proposed objective, which
consists in evaluating the way in which the ethnographic method has been used
in Brazilian organizational studies, this bibliographical study was developed.
According to Gil (2008, p. 97), "the
bibliographic research is developed based on material already prepared,
consisting mainly of books and scientific works". In the present work the
results of the evaluation of the results obtained in the analysis of the
results obtained in the study were analyzed: Yen-Tsang, Dultra-De-Lima and
Pretto (2012) and Magalhães and Dos-Santos (2013), then to add in the studies a
collection was made in the SPELL and EBSCO research bases. The election of
these events is due to their importance and representation in the national
academic scenario, as well as to believe in the potential of these for the
development of the field of organizational studies.
With regard to data collection, the annals of
the events were used, searching the articles for the following keywords:
"ethnography", "organizational studies" and
"tourism". In the case of EnanPAD, 12 editions were analyzed (2006 to
2018), of the EnEO 7 editions were analyzed (2006, 2008, 2010, 2014, 2016,
2018), of the Cbeo, 6 editions were analyzed (2013 to 2018), from the
Colloquium of Epistemology and Sociology of the Science of Administration, editions were analyzed (2011 to 2018), in the
SPELL database (Scientific Periodicals Electronic Library) and EBSCO (the
articles the criterion, "most cited" and "relevance"
between 2006 and 2018), focusing only on articles published in national and
international journals.
As results of the search in the annals of each
event and research base, the following amounts of studies were found. Before
the studies, we will have the percentage of article by the amount of articles
published in events and in the bases of Investigations.
Table 1: Articles found in the annals of events and in the bases of
research
Event / Research Base |
No. Editions / Year |
Quantity uantity uantity |
Percentage of Article Per Year / Event |
Cóloquio de Epistemologia |
8 |
15 |
1,88% |
EnEO |
7 |
28 |
4,00% |
CBEO |
6 |
38 |
6,33% |
EnANPAD |
12 |
95 |
7,92% |
SPELL |
12 |
549 |
45,75% |
EBSCO |
12 |
1025 |
85,42% |
Source:
Adapted from Magallanes and Santos (2016), Costa and Fonseca (2018)
After the articles were collected by events
and data analysis, the articles listed in the previous table were selected and
analyzed. Thus, first an analysis of some aspects was carried out, such as:
authorship, origin, temporal space, in which the articles were developed. After
a qualitative analysis was developed based on the categories of analysis
delimited from the review of the main authors, which sought to approximate the
ethnographic perspective and the Brazilian organizational studies, authors that
were revisited in the theoretical review of this study. The following topics
are presented in the following table:
Table 2: Topics of Analysis: Entography, Organizational Studies and
Tourism
Themes of Analysis |
Authors |
Sociological basis of our Organizational Studies |
Cavedon (1999; 2003); Jaime Jr (1996) Serva and Jaime Jr (1995) |
Understanding of field two Estudos Organized |
Cavedon (1999; 2003); Andion and Serva (2006); Serva y Jaime Jr (1995); JaimeJr (2003); Alcadipani (2009); Yen-Tsang, Dultra-De-Lima and Pretto (2013); |
Objectives for application of ethnographic perpsectiva nos Estudos Organizacionais |
Cavedon (2003); Alcadipani (2009, 2010); Andion and Serva
(2006); Jaime Jr. (2003, 2010) |
Conduct conduction time |
Cavedon (1999, 2003); Serva y Jaime Jr. (1995) Andion y Serva (2006) Cavedon and Faschin (2003) |
Planning, preparation, conduction and elaboration of research text |
Andion and Serva (2006); Cavedon (1999, 2003); Jaime Jr. (1996; 2003, 2010);Alcadipani (2010) |
Culture and tourism, tourism planning, public policy, the market and local communities |
Samatas (2003); Bowie and Chang (2005); Novelli, Schmitz and Spencer (2006); Larsen, Urry and Axhausen (2007);
Santos (2008); Frohlick and Harrison
(2008); Donaire, Silva, and
Gaspar (2009); Yázigi (2009); Christou and
Saveriades (2010); Watson (2011); Rantala (2011); Bianchi and Stephenson (2013); Butnaru (2015);
Konu (2015); Bispo (2016); Magalhães, and Dos-Santos (2016) ;
Sainaghi, Phillips and Zavarrone (2017); |
Sociological basis of our Organizational Studies |
Cavedon (1999; 2003); Jaime Jr (1996) Serva and Jaime Jr (1995) |
Understanding of field two Estudos Organized |
Cavedon (1999; 2003); Andion and Serva (2006); Serva y Jaime Jr (1995); JaimeJr (2003); Alcadipani (2009); Yen-Tsang, Dultra-De-Lima and Pretto (2013); |
Objectives for application of ethnographic perpsectiva nos Estudos Organizacionais |
Cavedon (2003); Alcadipani (2009, 2010); Andion and Serva
(2006); Jaime Jr. (2003, 2010) |
Conduct conduction time |
Cavedon (1999, 2003); Serva y Jaime Jr. (1995) Andion y Serva (2006) Cavedon and Faschin (2003) |
Planning, preparation, conduction and elaboration of research text |
Andion and Serva (2006); Cavedon (1999, 2003); Jaime Jr. (1996; 2003, 2010); Alcadipani (2010) |
Culture and tourism, tourism planning, public policy, the market and local communities |
Samatas (2003); Bowie and Chang (2005); Novelli, Schmitz and Spencer (2006); Larsen, Urry and Axhausen (2007);
Santos (2008); Frohlick and Harrison
(2008); Donaire, Silva, and Gaspar (2009); Yázigi (2009); Christou and
Saveriades (2010); Watson (2011); Rantala (2011); Bianchi and Stephenson(2013); Butnaru (2015);
Konu (2015); Bispo (2016); Magalhães, and Dos-Santos (2016) ; Sainaghi, Phillips and Zavarrone (2017); |
Source:
Adapted from Magallanes and Santos (2016), Costa and Fonseca (2018)
The topics of analysis listed (Table 2) were
delineated from the review of the literature of the main authors that sought to
approximate the ethnographic perspective of organizational studies and tourism
in Brazil in recent decades. Thus, from the complete reading of the selected
articles, the listing of each article was made and discussed among the authors
and, thus, a qualitative analysis was made, based on a critical and reflexive
positioning based on the categories shown a priori. From the analysis made it
is possible to record the results of this study.
4.
RESULTS OF THE STUDIES
The results of this study are presented below.
Thus, first the analysis of some aspects will be presented, such as university
of origin and temporary space, in which the articles were developed. Then, a
qualitative analysis based on the categories of analysis defined from the
review of the
main authors which
sought to approximate
the ethnographic perspective, organizational studies and
tourism in the national sphere and international contributions.
Figure 1:
Production of studies by edition of each event / research base
Source: Adapted
by the authors.
As can be seen in the graphs that make up
Figure 1, the events of the National Association of Postgraduate and Management
Research (ANPAD), EnANPAD and EnEO, are the events that have the most articles
published, mainly due to having more editions made, as well as for standing out
as the main events in the area of Brazilian organizational studies. The
Colloquium of Epistemology and Sociology of the Science of Administration and
the CBEO are more recent events that arise from a divergence of the
organizational studies in relation to the mainstream of the studies of the
administration.
Consequently, with the emergence of these
events, the number of studies that used the ethnographic approach in
organizational studies increased, which contributes to the discussion on the
possibilities of this approach in the field of organizations. As it is also
noticeable from the analysis of the graphics there is no linearity as the
publication during the course of the editions, but there is a higher incidence
of studies between the years 2010 and 2015 in the events of EnANPAD and EnEO,
as well as with the insertion of the Colloquium and the CBEO in the same period
of time.
4.1.
Critical and reflexive reflection of the analysis of
the studies
Outlining these first considerations, the
critical and reflexive analysis is presented from the previously proposed
categories in the methodological aspects. The first category established was
"Sociological Base in Organizational Studies", which was pointed out
by Cavedon (1999); Jaime Jr. (1996), Serva and Jaime Jr. (1995). According to
Cavedon (1999) the ethnography,
The first step for the approximation of the two sciences, which are,
Anthropology and Administration, requires a resumption of their theoretical
assumptions, from then on to verify the implications that such referential have
on the practical performance of those seeking the disengagement of
Organizational culture in light of ethnography. By way of conclusion, a
flexibilization in both sciences is proposed as long as the fundamental
principles of the sciences are maintained so that both can benefit from interdisciplinary
interchangeable exchange (CAVEDON, 1999, p. 1).
Therefore, it is interesting to note that the
understanding that organizations are spaces of intensive symbolism (CARRIERI;
SARAIVA, 2007) enabled the construction of an important dialogue of Organizational
Studies with Anthropology, especially through the development of ethnographies
that Budgets are based (YEN-TSANG; DULTRA-DE-LIMA; PRETTO, 2013). In this
sense, it is possible to observe that interpretative approaches reproduce the
initial understanding of the anthropology of separation between nature and
culture, looking for the human capacity to produce symbolic representations
(culture) about reality (nature) the understanding of that reality "(FIGUEIREDO;
OLIVEIRA, 2015, p. 9).
In the practical studies, in which the
ethnographic method was applied, which are the great majority of the studies
found, almost the whole highlight the anthropological origin of the
ethnographic perspective, as well as the concern for the specificities of the
method.
In addition, the researcher's epistemological
position in ethnography is important. Based on the results of this study,
researchers have a passive role in conducting ethnographic studies and are
limited to analyzing the material. In this regard, Tavakoli and Wijesinghe
(2014) believe that a deep understanding of online communities can only occur
through prolonged engagement and immersion in a culture for an extended period
of time. Firstly, it expands our knowledge of using information technology in
tourism to conduct online studies in a general sense. Secondly, it increases
our understanding of specific new methods for conducting netnographic studies.
The second category consists of the
"Understanding of the field of organizational studies", highlighted
by Cavedon (1999), Cavedon (2003); Alcadipani (2009); Andion and Serva (2006);
Serva and Jaime Jr. (1995); Jaime Jr. (2003). An important consideration to
stand out initially is that, as Bispo and Santos (2014) highlights in the area
of administration, in the Brazilian sphere, the word organization assumed in
the business context and, often, in the academic environment a synonym meaning to the company. This situation
makes many people, academics or not, use the word
organization with this meaning of company suggesting that such a position is
final. However, this issue awakens uncomfortable in a group of researchers who
are intensely inclined to the studies of organizations in a broader and more
complex way.
The third category proposed was
"Objectives for the application of the ethnographic perspective in
Organizational Studies", according to Cavedon (2003); Alcadipani (2009), Alcadipani
(2010); Andion and Serva (2006) and Jaime Jr. (2003). Broadly, according to
Figueiredo and Oliveira (2015), interpretative ethnographies made possible
the understanding of the relationship
between culture and
space in the Administration area, especially via
studies on organizational culture. Jaime Jr. (2003), for example, in
an ethnographic study
on a binational
enterprise highlights how
symbolic representations and the production of meanings about work constitute
different organizational spaces in the same organization. In this perspective,
the studies of Cavedon (1988), Cavedon (2014) are pointed out in
which the organizational culture ceases to be
considered as a manageable phenomenon, considering it as
plural, heterogeneous and symbolic. Cavedon (2004, p. 33-34) provides:
"[...] the network
of meanings that
circulate inside and
outside the organizational space,
being simultaneously ambiguous, contradictory, complementary, disparate
and analogous, involving
resemantizations that reveal the homogeneity and organizational
heterogeneity".
Another issue that stood out in terms of the application
of the ethnographic method was the issue of organizational networks. Andion and
Serva (2006) argue that in organizational studies, networks have been the
object of many studies, taking into account that in several cases a sense of
innovation is attributed to the organizational networks be it in the sphere of
civil society, the market or the State.
The fourth category of analysis was delineated
from the considerations of Cavedon (1999) Cavedon (2003), Serva and Jaime Jr.
(1995), Andion and Serva (2006) and Cavedon and Faschin (2003), and consists of
the question of time of conducting ethnographic research. Regarding the
conduction of the researches carried out, of the 122 studies, 81 of them had
between two and six months of studies in the organizations, other 29 studies
had between six months and two years of study and 5 articles had more of 2
years of research.
Thus, as it is possible to perceive,
ethnographic studies require time to understand and enable the researcher in
the analyzed context, to conquer an interaction with the partner actors that
allows understanding the relationships and complexities of social phenomena.
Interaction and going to the field is essential, that is, one cannot be a
cabinet ethnographer, an expression used by anthropologists to characterize
disqualifying ethnographers who do not experience the social fact.
The fifth category "Planning,
preparation, conduct and elaboration of the research text" was delineated
from Andion and Serva (2006), Cavedon (1999) Cavedon (2003), Jaime Jr. (1996), Jaime
Jr. (2003) and Alcadipani (2010). In the studies there are some precautions in
conducting the research. The first one is the preparation of researchers to go
to the field, and in that sense, Andion and Serva (2006) argue that one of the
basic conditions for the conduct of ethnography is a solid theoretical
preparation in the area of knowledge, however, the conception of the field the
subject of study goes further.
The sixth category "Culture and tourism,
tourism planning, public policies, the market and local communities"
focuses on the studies of Cruz (2000), Yázigi (2009), Marcelino (2007) and Beni
(2008). The studies torment the integrated planning of tourism to different
economic and social activities, also pointing out the importance of national,
regional and local sectoral plans to be connected for an adequate development
of the territory. As a result, the need for tourism education for public
bodies, local businessmen and resident population is observed, as well as the
need for a participatory process of the community in the preparation of
guidelines for the improvement of tourism. In this way, local development from
this activity can achieve, in addition to its economic purpose, such as the
involvement of local businesses, social benefits for the communities involved,
which will have preserved their cultural manifestations, history and local
ecological environment.
A final moment in the conduct of the research
is the elaboration of the text, but despite the limitation of the spaces of the
articles, the studies in their entirety sought to bring the results of the
research in the organizations studied, mainly highlighting the peculiarities of
phenomena and the actors studied, as well as their relationships. "This
moment of elaboration of the text is considered fundamental in ethnographic
research, since according to Laplantine (1996, p. 27)" the ethnographer is
expected not only to see and understand what he sees, but also to see ",
it is from the text that the researcher can transmit.
Bonetti and Fleischer (2007) point out that
one of the richest dimensions of ethnographic work lies in its experimental and
artisanal nature. In this way, it becomes impossible to "manualize"
ethnography, since each experience will be different, although on the same
object of investigation. Therefore, regardless of the type of field experience,
the researcher should keep in mind that their interaction and subsequent story
about given reality are impregnated by a work ethic, in the sense of respecting
the field and its participants.
Thus, it is worth highlighting that it is not
a compatible method with functionalist or positivist research questions about a
certain phenomenon - whether it is organizational or not. However, it is a
method that helps in the raising of theoretical and empirical questions and
propositions of a comprehensive and interpretative background of the lived
reality. To these aspects, the researcher
must be attentive
when planning his
"way of approaching" the phenomenon in pattern (DALLA CHIESA; FANTINEL,
2014).
The results of the current research reveal
that the majority of researchers did not report prolonged involvement, as
researchers must be part of the community for some time, possibly getting
involved with other members of the community. In addition, very few researchers
have provided a reflective account. Reflexivity helps the reader to understand
the researcher's position in the study as they experience the same context. The
reflective report can be presented as autonetnography. This type of etnographic
study has rarely been published in the tourism discipline (MKONO; RUHANEN;
MARKWELL, 2015).
5.
FINAL CONSIDERATIONS
When analyzing the studies on performance
evaluation in an ethnographic approach, it is perceived that there is a wide
possibility of development in this field of study, because the current scenario
in which the tourism companies are inserted is considered an increasingly
turbulent and unstable environment with respect to the political,
sociocultural, economic sector and mainly in the development of management
strategies, where decision makers constantly seek methods to achieve
improvements in organizational performance, because in competitive
environments, making decisions
and monitoring strategic
goals becomes essential
in the management process.
In the vision of Magallanes and Santos (2016)
the process of conducting ethnographic research is highlighted with the
preparation of the researcher and the interaction with the field and social
actors that impacts on the preparation of the final text based on theories
aligned to the studies organizational
The growth of national and international
tourism has led in recent decades to an evolution of the planning and public
policies of the sector. Many Brazilian municipalities seek to develop tourist
activity in their territory in order to obtain economic gains. However, as
important as the financial benefits, is the ability of the segment to promote
local development, based on the
appreciation of culture,
the preservation of
the ecological environment
and promoting the return to the community.
In this way, for the activity to reach those
desirable levels, it is essential to plan for the orderly development of the
sector and efficient management of actions to promote and maintain the
activity. This process must be carried out horizontally in the different
national, state and local sectoral policies. A social, transport, education and
environmental policy must always be associated with tourism policy, once that
sector appropriates the spaces for its development.
Business
environments strongly marked
by competition and
uncertainty, where competitive
advantages tend to be quickly reproduced and even overcome by competitors,
which requires that firms
be more active
and have an
innovative stance, adopt
more sophisticated management models, Existing knowledge, have
structures that are increasingly effective
and at the
same time flexible
in their decision-making processes
(ELBANNA; RODRIGUES, 2010; BRITO; BRITO, 2014).
Flores-Pereira and Cavedón (2009) consider
that ethnographic research enables the understanding of culture and
organizational space, on the other hand, organizational performance for tourism
in the vision of Sainaghi and Baggio (2017) is still not fully articulated,
being valid to highlight that there is a continuous expansion of the markets
and that has forced Brazilian hotels to become more competitive, due to the
increase in the number of international hotel networks operating in the country
and the prospect of new entrants, this has led Brazilian hotel networks to
improve their management tools (SILVA, 2007; SAINAGHI, PHILLIPS; CORTI, 2013;
ALVES, 2013; NUNES, 2016).
The
crucial point of
this study is to understand
the feasibility of
developing a multidimensional
performance evaluation model for organizational control in companies of the
hotel segment through ethnographic research. A subject that has been well
researched in recent years, making necessary the theoretical and practical
deepening of the study to contribute to the improvement of hotel organizations,
which seek information in support of their decision-making process, and through
the approach discussed and aligned with the Ethnographic surveys with
organizational studies can help to see the complexity and diversity of that
area.
REFERENCES
ACERENZA, M. A. (1995) Promoção turística: um
enfoque metodológico. São Paulo: Pioneira.
ANDION, C.; SERVA, M. (2006) A Etnografia e os
Estudos organizacionais. In: GODOI, C. K.; BANDEIRA-DE-MELO, R.; SILVA, A. B. (2006) Pesquisa Qualitativa em Estudos
Organizacionais: Paradigmas, Estratégias e Métodos. São Paulo: Saraiva.
ALCADIPANI, R. (2010) Violência e masculinidade nas
relações de trabalho: imagens do campo em pesquisa etnográfica. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, v.
8, n. 1, p. 23-35.
ATKINSON, P.; HAMMERSLEY, M.
(1994) Ethnography and Participant Observation. IN: DENZIN,
N.; LINCOLN, Y. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
ALVES, S. (2013) Modelo de mensuração da
competitividade turística sustentável de municípios no Brasil. Dissertação
(mestrado) – Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto COPPEAD de
Administração, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
ARENDIT, E. J. (2002) Introdução à economia do
turismo. Campinas-SP: Alinea.
AUGÉ, M.
(1999) Voyage et ethnographie. La vie comme recit. L’Homme. v. 39, n.
151.
BARTL, M.;
KANNAN, V. K.; STOCKINGER, H. (2016) A review and analysis of literature on
netnography research. International Journal of Technology Marketing, v. 11,
n. 2, p. 165–196.
BASZANGER,
I.; DODIER, N. (1997) Ethnography: relating the part to the whole. In:
SILVERMAN, D. Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice. London:
Sage, c. 2, p. 9-34,
BELZ,
F.-M.; BAUMBACH, W. (2010) Netnography as a method of lead user identification.
Creativity and Innovation Management, v. 19, n. 3, p. 304–313.
BENI, M.
(2008) Análise estrutural do turismo. São Paulo: SENAC.
BIANCHI,
R. (2006) Tourism and the globalization of fear: Analyzing the politics of risk
and (in) security in global travel. Tourism and Hospitality Research, v.
7, n. 1, p. 64–74.
BIANCHI,
R. V.; STEPHENSON, M. L. (2013)
Deciphering tourism and citizenship in a globalized world. Tourism Management, v. 39,
n. 1, p. 10-20.
BIGNAMI, R.
(2002) A imagem do Brasil no
turismo: construções, desafios e
vantagens competitivas. São Paulo: Aleph.
BISPO, M. S.; SANTOS, I. S. (2014) A organização do
cotidiano na orla de João Pessoa: um olhar
etnometodológico da prática
do voluntariado. Farol.
Revista de Estudos Organizacionais e Sociedade, v.
1, n. 2, p. 379-416.
BISPO, M. S. (2016) Tourism
as practice. Annals of Tourism Research. v. 61, p. 170-179.
BLASCO, E. F. (2001)
Análisis econômico y turismo. Estúdios y Perspectiva, v. 15,
p.53-63.
BOWIE,
D.; CHANG, J. (2005) Tourist Satisfaction: A view from a mixed international
guided package tour. Journal of Vacation Marketing, v. 11, n. 4, p. 302-
322.
BOVET, D.
(2001) Redes de valor. São Paulo: Negócio.
BARRETTO, M. (2006) Introdução. In: BANDUCCI-JR, Á.;
BARRETTO, M. Turismo e identidade local: uma visão antropológica. Campinas: Papirus, p. 07-20.
BREWER,
J. D. (2004) Ethnography. In: CASSELL, C.; SIMON, G. Essential Guide to
Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research. Londres: Sage, c. 25, p.
312-322.
BUTNARU,
G. I. (2015) The Method of Ethnographic and Content Analysis in Determining
Development Factors of Economic and Managerial Tourism Performance. Procedia Economics and Finance, v. 20,
p. 104-111.
CAMERON,
K. S.; WHETTEN, D. A. (1983) Organizational effectiveness: a comparison of
multiple models. San Diego: Academic Press.
CAVEDON, N. R. (2014) A qualidade de vida no
trabalho na área da Segurança Pública: uma perspectiva diacrônica das
percepções olfativas e suas implicações na saúde dos servidores. Organizações & Sociedade, v. 21, n. 68, p. 875-892.
CHEN, K.
Y. (2014) Improving importance-performance analysis: The role of the some of
tolerance and competitor performance. The case of Taiwan's hot spring hotels. Tourism
Management, v. 40, p. 260-272.
CHILD,
J.; ELBANNA, S.; RODRIGUES, S. B. (2010) The political aspects of strategic
decision- making. In: PAUL, C. N.; WILSON, D. C. The Handbook of Decision
Making. Chichester:
Wiley.
COSTA, F. L.; CUNHA, A. P. G. (2002) Pensar o
desenvolvimento a partir do local: novo desafios para os gestores públicos. Lisboa. In: Anais eletrônicos CLAD... Lisboa: CLAD.
CHRISTOU,
P.; SAVERIADES, A. (2010) The use of Ethnography to Explore Tourist
Satisfaction Antecedents. An International Multidisciplinary. Journal
of Tourism, v. 5, n. 1, p. 89-100.
DALLA CHIESA, C.; FANTINEL,
L. (2014) "Quando
eu vi, eu tinha feito uma etnografia": notas sobre como não
fazer uma “etnografia
acidental”. In: Encontro de Estudos Organizacionais da
ANPAD, 8, 2014, Gramado. Anais… Rio de Janeiro: Anpad.
DONAIRE, D.; SILVA, M. P.; GASPAR, M. A. (2009) A
rede de negócios do turismo: um estudo sobre suas características e implicações
estratégicas. Turismo: Visão e Ação, v. 11, n. 1, art. 7, p. 112-134.
FERREIRA, A. J. A. (2007) O Turismo e a produção do
espaço no estado do Maranhão, Brasil. Revista Electrónica de Geografía y Ciencias
Sociales. v. XI, n. 245, p. 58-7.
FETTERMAN,
D. M. (2010) Ethnography step by step. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
FLORES-PEREIRA, M. T.; CAVEDON, N. R. (2009) Os
bastidores de um estudo etnográfico: trilhando os caminhos teórico-empíricos
para desvendar as culturas organizacionais de uma livraria de shopping center. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, v. 7, n. 1, p. 144-160.
FROHLICK,
S.; HARRISON, J. (2008) Engaging ethnography in tourist research: An
introduction. Tourist Studies, v. 8, n. 1, p. 5–18.
EMBREE,
L. (2001) The continuation of Phenomenology: a fifth period? Indo-Pacific.
Journal of Phenomenology, v. 1, n. 1.
GRABURN, N. (2009) Turismo e Antropologia: novas abordagens.
Campinas, SP: Papirus.
GEERTZ, C. (1978) Por uma Teoria Interpretativa da
cultura. In: A interpretação das culturas. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar
Editores.
GODELDNER, C. R.; RITCHIE,
J. R.; BRENT, M.; ROBERT, W. (2002) Turismo:
princípios, práticas e filosofias. São Paulo: Bookman.
GODOI, C. K.; BANDEIRA-DE-MELO, R.; SILVA, A. B.
(2006) Pesquisa Qualitativa em Estudos Organizacionais: Paradigmas,
Estratégias e Métodos. São Paulo: Saraiva.
GODOY, A. (1995) Pesquisa Qualitativa – tipos
fundamentais. Revista de Administração de Empresas, v. 35, n. 3, p.
20-29.
HAMMERSLEY, M.; ATKINSON, P. (1994) Etnografía: métodos de
investigación. Barcelona, Paidós.
JAIME-JÚNIOR, P. (2003) Pesquisa em organizações:
por uma abordagem etnográfica. Civitas, v. 3, n. 2, p. 435-456.
JUPP, V.
(2006) The Sage Dictionary of Social Research Methods. Londres: Sage,
KAPLAN,
R. S.; NORTON, D. P. (1992)
The Balanced Scorecard: Measures
that drive Performance. Harvard
Business Review. January-February. p. 10-80.
KONU, H.
(2015) Developing a forest-based wellbeing tourism product together with
customers – An ethnographic approach. Tourism Management. v. 49, p.
1-16.
KOZINETS,
R. V. (2012) ‘Marketing netnography: prom/ot(ulgat)ing a new research method’. Methodological
Innovations Online, v. 7, n. 1, p. 37–45.
LARSEN,
J.; URRY, J.; AXHAUSEN, K. W. (2007) Networks and tourism: mobile social life. Annals of Tourism Research, v. 34,
n. 1, p. 244-262.
LEAL, R. E. S. (2010) A etnografia no estudo turismo
sob a perspectiva antropológica. In: Anais da Associação Brasileira de
Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Turismo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil. p. 1-12.
LEWIN, A.
Y.; MINTON, J. W. (1986) Determining organizational effectiveness: another
look, and agenda for research. Management Science, v. 32, n. 5, p.
514-538.
LUGOSI,
P. (2014) Hospitality and organizations: Enchantment, entrenchment and reconfiguration. Hospitality and Society, v. 4,
n. 1, p. 75-92.
MAGALHÃES, T. G.;
DOS-SANTOS, G. L. (2016) Etnografia e Estudos Organizacionais: Análise da Produção Científica
Brasileira. Revista Brasileira de
Estudos Organizacionais. v. 3. n. 2, p. 145-170.
MILLER, C. C.; WASHBURN, N. T.; GLICK, W. H. (2013)
The myth of firm performance. Organisation Science, v. 24,
n. 3, p. p. 948-964.
MKONO, M.;
RUHANEN, L.; MARKWELL, K. (2015) From netnography to autonetnography in tourism
studies. Annals of
Tourism Research, v. 52, p. 167–169.
MORGAN, G.; BERGAMINI, C. W.;
CODA, R. (1996) Imagens da
organização. São Paulo: Atlas.
NOGUEIRA, M. G. (1987) O papel do turismo no
desenvolvimento Econômico e social do Brasil. RAP, v. 21,
n. 2, p. 37-54.
NOVELLI,
M.; SCHMITZ, B.; SPENCER, T. (2006) Networks, clusters and innovation in
tourism: A UK experience. Tourism Management, London, v. 27, n. 6, p. 1141-1152.
NUNES, C. R. (2016) Métodos de avaliação de
desempenho dos hotéis: estudo empírico em Portugal. Tese (Doutorado em
Gestão Geral, Estratégia e Desenvolvimento Empresarial) – Instituto
Universitário de Lisboa – ISCTE – IUL. Escola de
Gestão. Lisboa, Portugal.
PALMER,
C. (2005) An Ethnography of Englishness: Experiencing identity through tourism.
Annals of Tourism Research, v. 32, n. 1, p. 7-27.
PAVLATOS,
O.; PAGGIOS, I. (2009) A survey of factors influencing the cost system design
in hotels. International Journal of Hospitality Management, v. 28, n. 2,
p. 263-271.
PIAGET,
J. (1990) Epistemologia Genética. São Paulo: Martins Fontes.
PIOLA, F. G.; ANDRADE, D. C. G.; KUSHANO, E. S.
(2018) Etnografia e Turismo: Um Estudo das Percepções e Sentimentos de Crianças
Residentes na Ilha Do Mel – PR. Applied Tourism, v. 3, n. 2, p. 01-35.
PINTO, R.; PEREIRO, X. (2010)
Turismo e antropologia: contribuições para um debate plural. Turismo e Desenvolvimento, p. 219-226.
RANTALA,
O. (2011) An Ethnographic Approach to
Nature-based Tourism. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, v. 11,
n. 2, p. 150-165.
ROCHA-PINTO, S. R.; FREITAS, A. S.; MAISONNAVE, P.
R. (2010) Métodos interpretativistas em Administração: implicações para pesquisadores. FACES, v. 9, n. 1.
REMENYI,
D.; WILLIAMS, B.; MONEY, A.; SWARTZ, E. (1998) Doing research in business and
management: an introduction to process and method. Research Methods for
Business & Management, Sage.
RITCHIE,
R.; RITCHIE, J. (2002) A framework for an industry supported destination
marketing information system. Tourism Management. v. 23, p. 439-454.
SAINAGHI,
R. (2010a) Hotel performance: State of the art. International Journal of
Contemporary Hospitality Management, v. 22, n. 7, p. 920-952.
SAINAGHI,
R.; PHILLIPS, P.; CORTI, V. (2013) Measuring hotel performance: Using a
balanced scorecard perspectives' approach. International Journal of
Hospitality Management, v. 34, n. 1, p. 150-159.
SAINAGHI,
R.; PHILLIPS, P.; ZAVARRONE, E. (2017) Performance measurement in tourism
firms: A content analytical meta-approach. Tourism Management, v. 59, p.
36-56.
SAINAGHI, R.; DE CARLO, M.
(2016) How to create destination capabilities in the Field
of new product development. In: PECHLANER, H.; INNERHOFER, E. (Eds.; p. Competence-based
innovation in hospitality and tourism, Routledge, p. 185-196.
SAINAGHI,
R.; BAGGIO, R. (2017) Complexity traits and dynamics of tourism destinations. Tourism
Management, v. 63, p. 368-382.
SAMATAS,
M. (2003) Greece in ‘Schengenland’:
blessing or anathema for citizens and foreigners’ rights. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, v. 29, n. 1, p.
141-156.
SANTANA, A. (2009) Antropologia do turismo: analogias,
encontros e relações. São Paulo: Aleph.
SILVA, D. E. P. (2007) Sistema de mensuração de
desempenho: proposta de um modelo para a indústria de Hospitalidade. Tese
(Doutorado) – Universidade Federal de Pernambuco. Programa de Pós-Graduação em
Engenharia de Produção, Pernambuco, Brasil,
SMITH, V.
L. (1998) War and tourism: An American ethnography. Annals of Tourism
Research, v. 25, n. 1, p. 202-227.
SPOHR, N.; CAVALCANT, M. F. R. (2013) Etnografia e
Estudos Organizacionais Críticos no Brasil. In: XXXVII Anais do Encontro da
ANPAD, Set.; Rio de Janeiro, p. 1-13.
TAVAKOLI,
R.; WIJESINGH, S. N. R. (2019) The evolution of the web and ethnography in
tourism: A systematic review. Tourism Management Perspectives. v. 29, p.
48- 55.
TEDLOCK,
B. (2000) Ethnography and Ethnography Representation. In: DENZIN, N. K.;
LINCOLN, Y. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oakds, CA: Sage.
TOMELIN, C. A. (2001) Mercado de agências de
viagens e turismo: como competir diante das novas tecnologias. São Paulo: Aleph.
UNWTO.
World Tourism Organization. (2012) Compendium of Tourism Statistics. Database,
UNWTO, Madrid.
UNWTO.
World Tourism Organization. (2013) Tourism Highlights. Database UNWTO,
Madrid.
VERGARA, S. C. (2008) Métodos de pesquisa em
administração. São Paulo: Atlas.
WATSON,
T. J. (2011) Ethnography, reality, and truth: The vital need for studies of
‘how things work’ in organizations and management. Journal of Management Studies, v. 48,
n. 1, p. 202-217.
YEN-TSANG, C.; DULTRA-DE-LIMA, R. G.; PRETTO,
K. (2013) Análise qualitativa das publicações nacionais e internacionais em
etnografias em administração e estudos organizacionais. RAEP, v. 14, n.
2, p. 21-247.
YÁZIGI, E. (2009) Saudades do futuro: por uma
teoria do planejamento territorial do turismo. São Paulo: Plêiade.